Early Educators’ Perceptions of Behavior

IF 2 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Topics in Early Childhood Special Education Pub Date : 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1177/02711214231170735
Courtney E. O’Grady, M. Ostrosky
{"title":"Early Educators’ Perceptions of Behavior","authors":"Courtney E. O’Grady, M. Ostrosky","doi":"10.1177/02711214231170735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We explored how teachers perceived challenging behavior in contrast to behaviors that exemplify social-emotional competence, and how descriptions of behavior varied based on child demographics such as gender, race/ethnicity, and disability status. Using a DisCrit lens, we conducted this study under the assumption that perceptions of behavior may be informed by teachers’ implicit biases. Fourteen preschool teachers shared their perspectives on behaviors they saw in the classroom, as exemplified by descriptions of the two children they considered the most socially-emotionally successful, A/Z, and the two they considered the most challenging, C/E. Children in the A/Z group were 54% female, 46% male, 54% White, 29% Black, and 82% did not receive special education services or need screening. Children in the C/E group were 86% male, 14% female, 46% Black, 36% White, and 75% were either receiving special education services or identified by teachers as needing a referral for screening. Positive A/Z behaviors included being a model, leader, or helper; having good play skills, manners, and verbal skills; and loving to learn. The challenging behaviors for C/E students included being hard to connect with; engaging in physical aggression and defiance; and having communication difficulties and poor self-regulation skills. These findings help us understand the role of implicit bias, systems issues, and the importance of culturally responsive practices in early childhood settings.","PeriodicalId":47496,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Early Childhood Special Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Early Childhood Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214231170735","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We explored how teachers perceived challenging behavior in contrast to behaviors that exemplify social-emotional competence, and how descriptions of behavior varied based on child demographics such as gender, race/ethnicity, and disability status. Using a DisCrit lens, we conducted this study under the assumption that perceptions of behavior may be informed by teachers’ implicit biases. Fourteen preschool teachers shared their perspectives on behaviors they saw in the classroom, as exemplified by descriptions of the two children they considered the most socially-emotionally successful, A/Z, and the two they considered the most challenging, C/E. Children in the A/Z group were 54% female, 46% male, 54% White, 29% Black, and 82% did not receive special education services or need screening. Children in the C/E group were 86% male, 14% female, 46% Black, 36% White, and 75% were either receiving special education services or identified by teachers as needing a referral for screening. Positive A/Z behaviors included being a model, leader, or helper; having good play skills, manners, and verbal skills; and loving to learn. The challenging behaviors for C/E students included being hard to connect with; engaging in physical aggression and defiance; and having communication difficulties and poor self-regulation skills. These findings help us understand the role of implicit bias, systems issues, and the importance of culturally responsive practices in early childhood settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期教育者的行为观
我们探讨了教师如何看待具有挑战性的行为与体现社会情感能力的行为,以及行为描述如何根据儿童人口统计数据(如性别、种族/民族和残疾状况)而变化。使用DisCrit镜头,我们在教师的隐性偏见可能影响行为感知的假设下进行了这项研究。14名学前教师分享了他们对课堂上所见行为的看法,他们认为两个孩子在社交情感上最成功,分别是A/Z和C/E。A/Z组的儿童中,54%为女性,46%为男性,54%为白人,29%为黑人,82%没有接受特殊教育服务或需要筛查。C/E组的儿童中,86%为男性,14%为女性,46%为黑人,36%为白人,75%接受特殊教育服务,或被教师认定需要转介进行筛查。积极的A/Z行为包括成为模范、领导者或助手;有良好的游戏技巧、礼貌和语言表达能力;热爱学习。C/E学生的挑战行为包括难以联系;进行身体攻击和反抗;沟通困难,自我调节能力差。这些发现有助于我们理解隐性偏见、制度问题的作用,以及在幼儿环境中文化响应实践的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Topics in Early Childhood Special Education (TECSE) communicates information about early intervention, which is defined broadly and includes services provided to (a) infants, toddlers, and preschoolers who are at risk for or display developmental delays and disabilities and (b) the families of such youngsters. TECSE includes articles on personnel preparation, policy issues, and operation of intervention programs. The intent is to publish information that will improve the lives of young children and their families. Manuscripts from (a) diverse theoretical perspectives, (b) all disciplines related to early intervention, and (c) all authors with information of value to the early intervention community are welcome. There are two topical issues—which address an identified problem, trend, or subject of concern and importance to early intervention—and two non-topical issues.
期刊最新文献
Fostering Dialogic Reading Through Older Siblings in Immigrant Latino Families: A Pilot Study Absolute Thinking Gets Us Absolutely Nowhere: Resisting False Dilemmas in Early Academics Emotion Talk in Early Childhood: A Systematic Literature Review Future Topics A Survey and Content Analysis of the Quality of Behavior Guidance Policies in Tennessee Early Childhood Programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1