Can We Trust Social Media?

Ingrid Hsieh-Yee
{"title":"Can We Trust Social Media?","authors":"Ingrid Hsieh-Yee","doi":"10.1080/10875301.2021.1947433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper presents a social media debate and introduces four position papers on social media as information sources. False information, uneven quality of information, bias, manipulation, and insufficient control of false information are the main reasons against trusting information on social media. Providing a level playing field for all voices, disseminating information efficiently, making valuable information more accessible, and balancing the power in scholarly communication are the reasons for trusting information on social media. The paper also examines the reasons for social media use and applies the concept of trust from e-commerce management literature to assess social media information.","PeriodicalId":35377,"journal":{"name":"Internet Reference Services Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10875301.2021.1947433","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Reference Services Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2021.1947433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract The paper presents a social media debate and introduces four position papers on social media as information sources. False information, uneven quality of information, bias, manipulation, and insufficient control of false information are the main reasons against trusting information on social media. Providing a level playing field for all voices, disseminating information efficiently, making valuable information more accessible, and balancing the power in scholarly communication are the reasons for trusting information on social media. The paper also examines the reasons for social media use and applies the concept of trust from e-commerce management literature to assess social media information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们可以信任社交媒体吗?
摘要本文介绍了一场关于社交媒体的辩论,并介绍了四份关于社交媒体作为信息来源的立场文件。虚假信息、信息质量参差不齐、偏见、操纵和对虚假信息的控制不足是不信任社交媒体上信息的主要原因。为所有声音提供一个公平的竞争环境,有效地传播信息,让有价值的信息更容易获得,以及平衡学术交流的力量,这些都是信任社交媒体上信息的原因。本文还考察了社交媒体使用的原因,并应用电子商务管理文献中的信任概念来评估社交媒体信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Reference Services Quarterly
Internet Reference Services Quarterly Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Internet Reference Services Quarterly tackles the tough job of keeping librarians up to date with the latest developments in Internet referencing and librarianship. This peer-reviewed quarterly journal is designed to function as a comprehensive information source librarians can turn to and count on for keeping up-to-date on emerging technological innovations, while emphasizing theoretical, research, and practical applications of Internet-related information services, sources, and resources. Librarians from any size or type of library in any discipline get the knowledge needed on how to best improve service through one of the most powerful reference tools available on the Internet.
期刊最新文献
Enriching Bibliographic Records Using AI – A Pilot by Ex Libris Use and Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Higher Education: Reflections from Instructors and Administrators “ChatGPT Assists Me in My Reference List:” Exploring the Chatbot’s Potential as Citation Formatting Tool Information Literacy Instruction Services at Rural Community Colleges, Fall 2019 Through AY 2021/22 “Don’t Let Grammarly Overwrite Your Style and Voice:” Writers’ Advice on Using Grammarly in Writing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1