The Nonthinkable, the Nonhuman, the Nonphilosophical: On the Function of Negation in Posthumanism

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 Arts and Humanities RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1080/10611967.2022.2110789
Nigina R. Sharopova
{"title":"The Nonthinkable, the Nonhuman, the Nonphilosophical: On the Function of Negation in Posthumanism","authors":"Nigina R. Sharopova","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2022.2110789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The philosophical manifestos of the past few decades involving attempts to go beyond constructs, discourses, and structures to the things themselves and a return to ontology and materialism often address the problems of the Anthropocene. Criticism of anthropocentrism and the introduction of the nonhuman into the focus of philosophy opened up new perspectives in solving the problems of idealism. This escape from the discursive aspect and the human factor, which is intended to break out philosophical projects to the outside, to what is on the other side of culture and language, to the planet, to matter, is accompanied by sequences of negations. Exploring the outer edge of philosophy, the periphery of culture, dark and marginal subjects, these authors try to construct a kind of anti-discourse, a nonphilosophy. In order to unlock the nonthinkable, what is being proposed to us is an exploration of objects that philosophical thought has heretofore ignored. The path to the nonhuman and nonthinkable lies through nonphilosophy. This article attempts to analyze such negations. It analyzes the function of negation by turning to psychoanalytic theory, in which the examination and modification of negation is one of the key themes. The principal mechanism of analysis is the modified logic of the psychoanalyst Jean Michel Vappereau. But the classical modifications of negation of Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan are also considered. The article’s central question—how does one interpret the negation in a human’s turning to the nonhuman, of philosophy to nonphilosophy, of an act of thought to the nonthinkable—is resolved in two ways, which constitute the two sections of the article. The results of the analysis open up obscure ways of interpreting such philosophical manifestos.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"60 1","pages":"186 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2022.2110789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The philosophical manifestos of the past few decades involving attempts to go beyond constructs, discourses, and structures to the things themselves and a return to ontology and materialism often address the problems of the Anthropocene. Criticism of anthropocentrism and the introduction of the nonhuman into the focus of philosophy opened up new perspectives in solving the problems of idealism. This escape from the discursive aspect and the human factor, which is intended to break out philosophical projects to the outside, to what is on the other side of culture and language, to the planet, to matter, is accompanied by sequences of negations. Exploring the outer edge of philosophy, the periphery of culture, dark and marginal subjects, these authors try to construct a kind of anti-discourse, a nonphilosophy. In order to unlock the nonthinkable, what is being proposed to us is an exploration of objects that philosophical thought has heretofore ignored. The path to the nonhuman and nonthinkable lies through nonphilosophy. This article attempts to analyze such negations. It analyzes the function of negation by turning to psychoanalytic theory, in which the examination and modification of negation is one of the key themes. The principal mechanism of analysis is the modified logic of the psychoanalyst Jean Michel Vappereau. But the classical modifications of negation of Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan are also considered. The article’s central question—how does one interpret the negation in a human’s turning to the nonhuman, of philosophy to nonphilosophy, of an act of thought to the nonthinkable—is resolved in two ways, which constitute the two sections of the article. The results of the analysis open up obscure ways of interpreting such philosophical manifestos.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不可思考的、非人的、非哲学的——论否定在后人文主义中的作用
摘要过去几十年的哲学宣言,包括试图超越结构、话语和结构,回到事物本身,回归本体论和唯物主义,通常都涉及人类世的问题。对人类中心主义的批判以及将非人类引入哲学焦点,为解决唯心主义问题开辟了新的视角。这种对话语方面和人类因素的逃避,旨在向外部、向文化和语言的另一端、向地球、向物质展开哲学项目,伴随着一系列否定。这些作者在探索哲学的边缘、文化的边缘、黑暗和边缘的主体时,试图构建一种反话语的非哲学。为了解开不可思考的东西,向我们提出的是对哲学思想迄今为止忽视的对象的探索。通往非人类和非思考的道路在于非哲学。本文试图分析这种否定。它从精神分析的角度分析否定的功能,其中否定的检验和修正是其中的一个重要主题。分析的主要机制是精神分析学家让-米歇尔·瓦珀罗修改的逻辑。但也考虑了弗洛伊德和拉康对否定的经典修改。这篇文章的核心问题——如何解读人类转向非人类、哲学转向非哲学、思维行为转向非思维的否定——通过两种方式得到了解决,这两种方式构成了文章的两个部分。分析的结果为解读这些哲学宣言开辟了一条晦涩难懂的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Russian Studies in Philosophy publishes thematic issues featuring selected scholarly papers from conferences and joint research projects as well as from the leading Russian-language journals in philosophy. Thematic coverage ranges over significant theoretical topics as well as topics in the history of philosophy, both European and Russian, including issues focused on institutions, schools, and figures such as Bakhtin, Fedorov, Leontev, Losev, Rozanov, Solovev, and Zinovev.
期刊最新文献
Concluding Russian Studies in Philosophy: An Eye Towards the Future The Concept of Perfection in Lev Karsavin’s Religious Metaphysics Variants of Images of the Future in the Work of Lev P. Karsavin Lev Karsavin: Russian Religiosity and Russian Revolution The Metaphysical Path: Lev P. Karsavin’s Philosophical Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1