Management of Supracondylar Fractures in the Prone Position: Case Series, Technique, and Literature Review

IF 4.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Techniques in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2020-11-18 DOI:10.1097/BTE.0000000000000209
Andrew L. Schaver, J. Akeson, Robert A. Kinzinger, M. Ramirez
{"title":"Management of Supracondylar Fractures in the Prone Position: Case Series, Technique, and Literature Review","authors":"Andrew L. Schaver, J. Akeson, Robert A. Kinzinger, M. Ramirez","doi":"10.1097/BTE.0000000000000209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In displaced supracondylar humerus fractures, closed reduction percutaneous pinning is recommended and is most commonly performed in the supine position with the arm held in hyperflexion. The risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury with medial pin placement is high in this position. We performed a retrospective case series of 149 patients with displaced supracondylar humerus fractures treated in the prone position. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury with medial pin placement, report our technique, and conduct a literature review to serve as historical control. The rate of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury was evaluated and compared with a historical control cohort of 1029 patients treated supine. A total of 131 patients were included: 74 (56%) patients received a medial pin, and 57 (44%) patients received lateral pins only. Postoperative complications included 2 cases of pin migration (1.5%). No patients sustained iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury, compared with a historical control rate of 4.95%. Our technique is correlated with a lower incidence of ulnar nerve injuries than historical controls performed in the supine position. We believe this technique can facilitate safer pin placement in cases that require a medial pin. Level of Evidence: Level IV.","PeriodicalId":44224,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"21 1","pages":"112 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BTE.0000000000000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In displaced supracondylar humerus fractures, closed reduction percutaneous pinning is recommended and is most commonly performed in the supine position with the arm held in hyperflexion. The risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury with medial pin placement is high in this position. We performed a retrospective case series of 149 patients with displaced supracondylar humerus fractures treated in the prone position. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury with medial pin placement, report our technique, and conduct a literature review to serve as historical control. The rate of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury was evaluated and compared with a historical control cohort of 1029 patients treated supine. A total of 131 patients were included: 74 (56%) patients received a medial pin, and 57 (44%) patients received lateral pins only. Postoperative complications included 2 cases of pin migration (1.5%). No patients sustained iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury, compared with a historical control rate of 4.95%. Our technique is correlated with a lower incidence of ulnar nerve injuries than historical controls performed in the supine position. We believe this technique can facilitate safer pin placement in cases that require a medial pin. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俯卧位髁上骨折的治疗:病例系列、技术和文献综述
在移位的肱骨髁上骨折中,建议采用闭合复位经皮钉扎,最常见的方法是仰卧位,手臂保持超屈状态。在这种位置,医源性尺神经损伤的风险很高。我们对149例俯卧位移位肱骨髁上骨折患者进行了回顾性病例分析。本研究的目的是评估医源性尺神经损伤的发生率,报告我们的技术,并进行文献回顾作为历史对照。评估医源性尺神经损伤的发生率,并与1029名仰卧位患者的历史对照队列进行比较。共纳入131名患者:74名(56%)患者接受了内侧钉,57名(44%)患者仅接受了外侧钉。术后并发症包括2例(1.5%)钉移位。没有患者遭受医源性尺神经损伤,而历史控制率为4.95%。与仰卧位的历史控制相比,我们的技术与尺神经损伤的发生率较低有关。我们相信,在需要内侧销钉的情况下,这种技术可以促进更安全的销钉放置。证据级别:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Published quarterly, Techniques in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery escorts the reader into the operating room and supplies step-by-step details of exciting and advanced techniques. It explains the evolution of and rationale for the procedures, identifies the pitfalls and possible complications, provides invaluable tips for improving surgical results and it is illustrated cover to cover with high-quality intraoperative photographs and drawings, many in full color.
期刊最新文献
Lateral Epicondylitis Intramedullary Screw Fixation Supplemented by Scapular Spine Plating: A Surgical Technique for the Base of Acromion Fracture Small Fragment Instrumentation for Periprosthetic Humerus Fracture Fixation Technique A Simplified Technique for Patient Positioning During Olecranon Fracture Fixation Lateralized Versus Nonlateralized Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Impact on Clinical and Functional Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1