Ambulatory Heart Function and Transplant Patients' Perceptions of Drug-Drug Interactions: A Qualitative Study.

IF 0.6 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY Pub Date : 2022-04-04 DOI:10.4212/cjhp.v75i2.3074
David Poon, M. Legal, Louise Lau, Harkaryn Bagri, K. Dahri
{"title":"Ambulatory Heart Function and Transplant Patients' Perceptions of Drug-Drug Interactions: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"David Poon, M. Legal, Louise Lau, Harkaryn Bagri, K. Dahri","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.v75i2.3074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nDrug-drug interactions (DDIs) can cause adverse drug events, leading to hospitalizations and an increase in the risk of morbidity and mortality. Until now, patients' perceptions of DDIs have represented an understudied area of research.\n\n\nObjectives\nTo explore patients' perceptions of DDIs and identify factors important to patients' understanding of their medications.\n\n\nMethods\nParticipants were recruited from 2 ambulatory clinics (heart function and transplant) in Vancouver, British Columbia. Participants engaged in key informant interviews and were asked to provide their demographic information, rate their understanding of their own medications, and define a DDI. Afterward, participants were interviewed to gather their perceptions of DDIs and factors important to their understanding of their medications.\n\n\nResults\nA total of 7 patients were recruited. Participants struggled to define a DDI and were unsure if they had ever experienced a DDI. There was a reliance on health care professionals to help manage DDIs. Participants did not identify barriers preventing them from accessing medication information from health care professionals; however, they independently sought medication information found on the internet.\n\n\nConclusions\nPatients in this study had an incomplete understanding of DDIs and had difficulties differentiating DDIs from side effects of medications. As a result of their limited understanding of DDIs, patients relied on health care professionals to inform and manage their DDIs. Although patients did not identify barriers to accessing medication information, their pervasive use of the internet suggests that there are unidentified barriers preventing patients from speaking directly to their health care professionals regarding their medication therapy.","PeriodicalId":51646,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","volume":"75 2 1","pages":"71-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v75i2.3074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can cause adverse drug events, leading to hospitalizations and an increase in the risk of morbidity and mortality. Until now, patients' perceptions of DDIs have represented an understudied area of research. Objectives To explore patients' perceptions of DDIs and identify factors important to patients' understanding of their medications. Methods Participants were recruited from 2 ambulatory clinics (heart function and transplant) in Vancouver, British Columbia. Participants engaged in key informant interviews and were asked to provide their demographic information, rate their understanding of their own medications, and define a DDI. Afterward, participants were interviewed to gather their perceptions of DDIs and factors important to their understanding of their medications. Results A total of 7 patients were recruited. Participants struggled to define a DDI and were unsure if they had ever experienced a DDI. There was a reliance on health care professionals to help manage DDIs. Participants did not identify barriers preventing them from accessing medication information from health care professionals; however, they independently sought medication information found on the internet. Conclusions Patients in this study had an incomplete understanding of DDIs and had difficulties differentiating DDIs from side effects of medications. As a result of their limited understanding of DDIs, patients relied on health care professionals to inform and manage their DDIs. Although patients did not identify barriers to accessing medication information, their pervasive use of the internet suggests that there are unidentified barriers preventing patients from speaking directly to their health care professionals regarding their medication therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态心脏功能与移植患者对药物相互作用的认知:一项定性研究。
背景药物-药物相互作用(DDIs)会导致药物不良事件,导致住院,并增加发病率和死亡率。到目前为止,患者对DDI的认知一直是一个研究不足的领域。目的探讨患者对DDI的认知,并确定对患者理解药物的重要因素。方法参与者来自不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华市的两个门诊(心脏功能和移植)。参与者参与了关键的线人访谈,并被要求提供他们的人口统计信息,评估他们对自己药物的理解,并定义DDI。之后,参与者接受了采访,以收集他们对DDI的看法以及对他们理解药物很重要的因素。结果共招募7名患者。参与者很难定义DDI,也不确定自己是否经历过DDI。依赖医疗保健专业人员来帮助管理DDI。参与者没有发现阻碍他们从医疗保健专业人员那里获得药物信息的障碍;然而,他们独立寻找互联网上的药物信息。结论本研究中的患者对DDIs的了解不完全,难以区分DDIs和药物副作用。由于患者对DDI的了解有限,他们依赖卫生保健专业人员来告知和管理他们的DDI。尽管患者没有发现获取药物信息的障碍,但他们对互联网的广泛使用表明,存在未识别的障碍,阻碍患者直接与医疗保健专业人员谈论他们的药物治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The CJHP is an academic journal that focuses on how pharmacists in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings optimize safe and effective drug use for patients in Canada and throughout the world. The aim of the CJHP is to be a respected international publication serving as a major venue for dissemination of information related to patient-centred pharmacy practice in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings in Canada and throughout the world.
期刊最新文献
Burnout: A Real Problem in Need of Multifaceted Solutions. Considering Sex and Gender in Therapeutics throughout the Product Life Cycle: A Narrative Review and Case Study of Gilteritinib. Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Canadian Hospitals. Impact of Pharmacist-Provided Education Using New Information Sheets on Activation in Patients Treated with Oral Antineoplastic Drugs (IMPACT-OAD Project). Cap sur un avenir durable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1