How does intelligent manufacturing reconcile the conflict between process standards and technological innovation?

IF 3.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Engineering and Technology Management Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101698
Kangkang Yu , Cheng Qian , Jinliang Chen
{"title":"How does intelligent manufacturing reconcile the conflict between process standards and technological innovation?","authors":"Kangkang Yu ,&nbsp;Cheng Qian ,&nbsp;Jinliang Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding whether process standards foster or hinder technological innovation lacks consensus in the literatures. From the process management perspective, this study aimes at exploring the mechanisms underlying this relationship under a specific situation of intelligent manufacturing. By analyzing interview data from four case companies in the environmental instrument industry in China and secondary data at the firm level, we find that (i) process standards have a positive effect on technological innovation and (ii) process standards in companies with relatively high levels of intelligent manufacturing raise technological innovation. In particular, these four companies are differentiated with respect to intelligent manufacturing context: two companies with relatively high levels of intelligent manufacturing; and the other two with relatively low levels of intelligent manufacturing. Based on the case analysis, we find that there is an open logic, tightening both internal and external communication linkages, between process standards and technological innovation, so process standards positively affect technological innovation. Further, we find that for those with a higher level of intelligent manufacturing, firms typically benefit more organizational learning competency, which enhances the impact of process standards on technological innovation. The findings are also confirmed by a post hoc survey. Above all, this study contributes to the literatures on process management and technological innovation as well as the new trend of intelligent manufacturing in Industry 4.0.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101698"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474822000285","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Understanding whether process standards foster or hinder technological innovation lacks consensus in the literatures. From the process management perspective, this study aimes at exploring the mechanisms underlying this relationship under a specific situation of intelligent manufacturing. By analyzing interview data from four case companies in the environmental instrument industry in China and secondary data at the firm level, we find that (i) process standards have a positive effect on technological innovation and (ii) process standards in companies with relatively high levels of intelligent manufacturing raise technological innovation. In particular, these four companies are differentiated with respect to intelligent manufacturing context: two companies with relatively high levels of intelligent manufacturing; and the other two with relatively low levels of intelligent manufacturing. Based on the case analysis, we find that there is an open logic, tightening both internal and external communication linkages, between process standards and technological innovation, so process standards positively affect technological innovation. Further, we find that for those with a higher level of intelligent manufacturing, firms typically benefit more organizational learning competency, which enhances the impact of process standards on technological innovation. The findings are also confirmed by a post hoc survey. Above all, this study contributes to the literatures on process management and technological innovation as well as the new trend of intelligent manufacturing in Industry 4.0.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智能制造如何调和工艺标准与技术创新之间的冲突?
了解过程标准是促进还是阻碍技术创新在文献中缺乏共识。本研究从流程管理的角度出发,探讨智能制造特定情境下这种关系背后的机制。通过对中国环境仪表行业四家案例企业的访谈数据和企业层面的二次数据分析,我们发现:(1)工艺标准对技术创新具有积极作用;(2)智能制造水平较高的企业的工艺标准促进了技术创新。特别是,这四家公司在智能制造的背景下是有区别的:两家公司的智能制造水平相对较高;而另外两个国家的智能制造水平相对较低。通过案例分析,我们发现流程标准与技术创新之间存在着一种开放的逻辑,紧密了内部和外部的沟通联系,因此流程标准对技术创新具有积极的影响。研究还发现,智能制造水平越高的企业,其组织学习能力越强,过程标准对技术创新的影响越大。一项事后调查也证实了这些发现。最重要的是,本研究有助于流程管理和技术创新的文献,以及工业4.0下智能制造的新趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (JET-M) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology, innovation, and engineering management. The journal links engineering, science, and management disciplines. It addresses the issues involved in the planning, development, and implementation of technological capabilities to shape and accomplish the strategic and operational objectives of an organization. It covers not only R&D management, but also the entire spectrum of managerial concerns in technology-based organizations. This includes issues relating to new product development, human resource management, innovation process management, project management, technological fusion, marketing, technological forecasting and strategic planning. The journal provides an interface between technology and other corporate functions, such as R&D, marketing, manufacturing and administration. Its ultimate goal is to make a profound contribution to theory development, research and practice by serving as a leading forum for the publication of scholarly research on all aspects of technology, innovation, and engineering management.
期刊最新文献
How to design prototypes to prevent potential dominant logic conflict during the iterative learning process Patent pool and dominant design: An empirical study of patent pool from MPEG-LA Accelerating corporate innovation ecosystems: The exprivia business incubator case study Rethinking the trade-off relationship between innovation quantity and quality: the evidence from public energy R&D programs in South Korea Digital servitization strategies and business model innovation: The role of knowledge-intensive business services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1