Are human rights archives accessible? Challenges and possible solutions to improve access for Dealing with the Past initiatives

Q3 Arts and Humanities Comma Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.3828/comma.2020.9
Romain Ledauphin, C. Josi, Rahel Siegrist
{"title":"Are human rights archives accessible? Challenges and possible solutions to improve access for Dealing with the Past initiatives","authors":"Romain Ledauphin, C. Josi, Rahel Siegrist","doi":"10.3828/comma.2020.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nRecords and archives containing information relating to grave violations of human rights and international humanitarian law represent a fundamental source for, and can become trustworthy documentary evidence within, Dealing with the Past (DWP) processes including truth commissions, criminal tribunals, reparation programs, vetting processes and outreach projects. Those intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) and international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) working in the fields of human rights and peace and security are themselves important observers and actors in DWP processes and hence their records and archives are highly relevant to DWP initiatives. Such organizations should therefore be transparent and be able to facilitate DWP processes by granting access to their records. Given the International Council on Archives’ definition of “access” as relating to “… the availability of records for consultation as a result both of legal authorization and the existence of finding aids”, and the experience of swisspeace in advising DWP initiatives on collecting evidence and improving records management capacity, swisspeace together with the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs developed a roadmap which centres on the development of an “archives accessibility maturity model”. This tool will not only improve hands-on access in practice, but will ultimately improve knowledge about the multi-layered complexity of archives’ accessibility, strengthening the capacity of IGOs, INGOs and DWP initiatives to design and implement their access regulations, and thereby improving DWP initiatives’ ability to make successful access requests.","PeriodicalId":36616,"journal":{"name":"Comma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/comma.2020.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Records and archives containing information relating to grave violations of human rights and international humanitarian law represent a fundamental source for, and can become trustworthy documentary evidence within, Dealing with the Past (DWP) processes including truth commissions, criminal tribunals, reparation programs, vetting processes and outreach projects. Those intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) and international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) working in the fields of human rights and peace and security are themselves important observers and actors in DWP processes and hence their records and archives are highly relevant to DWP initiatives. Such organizations should therefore be transparent and be able to facilitate DWP processes by granting access to their records. Given the International Council on Archives’ definition of “access” as relating to “… the availability of records for consultation as a result both of legal authorization and the existence of finding aids”, and the experience of swisspeace in advising DWP initiatives on collecting evidence and improving records management capacity, swisspeace together with the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs developed a roadmap which centres on the development of an “archives accessibility maturity model”. This tool will not only improve hands-on access in practice, but will ultimately improve knowledge about the multi-layered complexity of archives’ accessibility, strengthening the capacity of IGOs, INGOs and DWP initiatives to design and implement their access regulations, and thereby improving DWP initiatives’ ability to make successful access requests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人权档案可以查阅吗?挑战和可能的解决方案,以改善处理过去举措的机会
包含严重侵犯人权和国际人道主义法信息的记录和档案是处理过去问题程序的基本来源,可以成为值得信赖的文件证据,包括真相委员会、刑事法庭、赔偿方案、审查程序和外联项目。从事人权、和平与安全领域工作的政府间组织和国际非政府组织本身就是多哈工作方案进程中的重要观察员和行动者,因此它们的记录和档案与多哈工作方案的举措高度相关。因此,这些组织应该是透明的,并能够通过允许访问其记录来促进DWP流程。鉴于国际档案理事会对“查阅”的定义涉及“……由于法律授权和寻找辅助手段的存在,可供查阅的记录”,以及swisspeace在就DWP收集证据和提高记录管理能力的举措提供咨询方面的经验,swisspeace与瑞士联邦外交部共同制定了一个路线图,重点是开发“档案无障碍成熟度模型”。该工具不仅将改善实践中的实际访问,而且最终将提高对档案可访问性的多层次复杂性的了解,加强政府间组织、国际非政府组织和DWP计划设计和实施其访问法规的能力,从而提高DWP计划成功提出访问请求的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comma
Comma Arts and Humanities-Conservation
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract Argumentation with Conditional Preferences No man is an island entire of itself: Legal frameworks and the relocation of a nation’s archive due to rising sea levels Sunspot observations and glacier images. Archival research partnerships focusing on modern climate research 气象档案在气象发展史中的角色转变及发展趋势 Redrawing historical weather data and participatory archives for the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1