Increasing Parenting Self-Efficacy Through a Community Partnership in Akron, Ohio

Annette Sues-Mitzel, Alexandria Coffey, M. Espe-Sherwindt, D. Gothard, Deborah Maglionico, Heather Ekers, Ameeca Holmes, Monika Hale-Johnson, Heather Wuensch, Mary Douglas
{"title":"Increasing Parenting Self-Efficacy Through a Community Partnership in Akron, Ohio","authors":"Annette Sues-Mitzel, Alexandria Coffey, M. Espe-Sherwindt, D. Gothard, Deborah Maglionico, Heather Ekers, Ameeca Holmes, Monika Hale-Johnson, Heather Wuensch, Mary Douglas","doi":"10.18061/ojph.v5i1.8765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Nurturing Family Program (NFP) is a family-centered educational curriculum designed to equip parents with tools and techniques to support a nurturing relationship with their child. While there have been many evaluations of the NFP, no evaluations to date measure how the curriculum may influence parenting self-efficacy, how confident a caregiver feels about their ability to foster their child’s development and success, or parenting stress.\nMethods: This community-based interventional study used a convenience sample of families recruited from community agencies or within a pediatric medical center. Families with one or more children aged 0 to 5 years, premature infants or an infant discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and/or adolescent parents were invited to participate in NFP. Participants were recruited from community agencies that were most likely to work with populations meeting program eligibility criteria. The NFP was offered as in-home and community-based sessions. The primary outcome of interest was perceived parental self-efficacy, measured using the Tool to Measure Parenting Efficacy (TOPSE) at weeks 1, 5, and 10. The secondary outcome of interest was perceived level of stress, as measured by a visual analog scale each week.\nResults: Participants of community-based sessions (n=45) experienced a significant increase in parenting self-efficacy at week 10, compared to week 1 and week 5 (p <0.01). Overall, participants of the community-based sessions experienced an average increase of 17.7 points on the TOPSE scale (p =0.014). Across all participants (n=79), each session attended resulted in a modest, but significant, 3% reduction in stress (p =0.021).\nConclusion: The NFP improved parental self -efficacy among participants of the community-based sessions and reduced perceived stress for all participants.","PeriodicalId":74337,"journal":{"name":"Ohio journal of public health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ohio journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/ojph.v5i1.8765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Nurturing Family Program (NFP) is a family-centered educational curriculum designed to equip parents with tools and techniques to support a nurturing relationship with their child. While there have been many evaluations of the NFP, no evaluations to date measure how the curriculum may influence parenting self-efficacy, how confident a caregiver feels about their ability to foster their child’s development and success, or parenting stress. Methods: This community-based interventional study used a convenience sample of families recruited from community agencies or within a pediatric medical center. Families with one or more children aged 0 to 5 years, premature infants or an infant discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and/or adolescent parents were invited to participate in NFP. Participants were recruited from community agencies that were most likely to work with populations meeting program eligibility criteria. The NFP was offered as in-home and community-based sessions. The primary outcome of interest was perceived parental self-efficacy, measured using the Tool to Measure Parenting Efficacy (TOPSE) at weeks 1, 5, and 10. The secondary outcome of interest was perceived level of stress, as measured by a visual analog scale each week. Results: Participants of community-based sessions (n=45) experienced a significant increase in parenting self-efficacy at week 10, compared to week 1 and week 5 (p <0.01). Overall, participants of the community-based sessions experienced an average increase of 17.7 points on the TOPSE scale (p =0.014). Across all participants (n=79), each session attended resulted in a modest, but significant, 3% reduction in stress (p =0.021). Conclusion: The NFP improved parental self -efficacy among participants of the community-based sessions and reduced perceived stress for all participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄亥俄州阿克伦市通过社区伙伴关系提高育儿自我效能
背景:养育家庭计划(NFP)是一项以家庭为中心的教育课程,旨在为父母提供工具和技术,以支持与孩子的养育关系。虽然对NFP进行了许多评估,但迄今为止,没有任何评估可以衡量课程如何影响育儿自我效能感,照顾者对自己培养孩子发展和成功的能力有多自信,或者育儿压力。方法:这项基于社区的干预研究使用了从社区机构或儿科医疗中心招募的家庭的方便样本。邀请有一个或多个0至5岁儿童、早产儿或新生儿重症监护室(NICU)出院婴儿的家庭和/或青少年父母参加NFP。参与者是从最有可能与符合项目资格标准的人群合作的社区机构招募的。NFP以家庭和社区会议的形式提供。感兴趣的主要结果是感知父母自我效能,在第1、5和10周使用测量父母效能的工具(TOPSE)进行测量。兴趣的次要结果是感知压力水平,每周通过视觉模拟量表进行测量。结果:与第1周和第5周相比,社区课程的参与者(n=45)在第10周的育儿自我效能感显著提高(p<0.01)。总体而言,社区课程参与者在TOPSE量表上的平均得分提高了17.7分(p=0.014)。在所有参与者(n=79)中,压力降低3%(p=0.021)。结论:NFP改善了社区会议参与者的父母自我效能感,并降低了所有参与者的感知压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health Issues in Ohio Availability and Characteristics of Hemp-Derived Psychoactive Cannabis Products: A Pilot Study in Cleveland, Ohio Application of The Healthy Migrant Theory to Maternal Morbidity and Mortality Data in Ohio How Can Public Health Professionals Help to Improve Mental Health for Students Using Distance Learning? Aging in Ohio: Trends and Preparation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1