What does it mean to be civic-ready? Uncovering citizenship conceptualizations in US states that require the ‘citizenship test’

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education Citizenship and Social Justice Pub Date : 2020-10-04 DOI:10.1177/1746197920949971
A. Johnson
{"title":"What does it mean to be civic-ready? Uncovering citizenship conceptualizations in US states that require the ‘citizenship test’","authors":"A. Johnson","doi":"10.1177/1746197920949971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a growing trend within civics education within the United States to adopt the USCIS naturalization civics exam (commonly referred to as the ‘citizenship test’), which consists of 100 multiple choice questions, to determine the civic readiness of students. This study explores civics education within eight US states that have adopted the ‘citizenship test’ model through the lens of citizenship conceptualizations evidenced within their high school civics state standards. Utilizing a directed content analysis, the researcher located more than 230 standards within three citizenship discourse categories: civic republican, liberal, and reconstructionist. Citizenship within the examined state standards, was largely conceptualized as civic republican in orientation (96%) and nested within untroubled assumptions of US society and desires for a common American identity that often crowded out attention to diversity and conflict and in doing so, mirrored exclusionary practices common to standardized, high-stakes assessments including the USCIS naturalization civics exam.","PeriodicalId":45472,"journal":{"name":"Education Citizenship and Social Justice","volume":"16 1","pages":"245 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1746197920949971","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Citizenship and Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197920949971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing trend within civics education within the United States to adopt the USCIS naturalization civics exam (commonly referred to as the ‘citizenship test’), which consists of 100 multiple choice questions, to determine the civic readiness of students. This study explores civics education within eight US states that have adopted the ‘citizenship test’ model through the lens of citizenship conceptualizations evidenced within their high school civics state standards. Utilizing a directed content analysis, the researcher located more than 230 standards within three citizenship discourse categories: civic republican, liberal, and reconstructionist. Citizenship within the examined state standards, was largely conceptualized as civic republican in orientation (96%) and nested within untroubled assumptions of US society and desires for a common American identity that often crowded out attention to diversity and conflict and in doing so, mirrored exclusionary practices common to standardized, high-stakes assessments including the USCIS naturalization civics exam.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
做好公民准备意味着什么?揭示美国各州需要“公民身份测试”的公民身份概念
在美国公民教育中,采用美国公民及移民服务局入籍公民考试(通常称为“公民考试”)的趋势越来越大,该考试由100道选择题组成,以确定学生的公民准备程度。本研究探讨了美国八个州的公民教育,这些州采用了“公民身份测试”模式,通过其高中公民身份州标准中的公民身份概念化来证明这一点。通过直接内容分析,研究人员在公民共和主义、自由主义和重建主义三个公民话语类别中找到了230多个标准。在所审查的州标准中,公民身份在很大程度上被概念化为公民共和主义(96%),并嵌套在美国社会的无障碍假设和对共同美国身份的渴望中,这些假设和渴望往往会排挤对多样性和冲突的关注,在这样做的过程中,反映了标准化、,包括美国移民局入籍公民考试在内的高风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education Citizenship and Social Justice
Education Citizenship and Social Justice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Destination: Wokeness? Possibilities for exploring domestic educational travel as conscientizing praxis From influencing school food to handling hate speech: Methods, areas, and limitations of active citizenship in Finnish social studies textbooks Discerning risk-takers from avoiders: Which teachers are more likely to support teaching about the violent past in Ambon, Indonesia? Conceptualizing political information literacy among young people: A systematized review of the literature Pedagogies of generosity: Towards a multidimensional understanding that nurtures ‘critical generosity’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1