Pilot Test of a Definitive Prosthetic Socket Made with 3D Printing Technology

IF 0.4 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Pub Date : 2021-11-25 DOI:10.1097/JPO.0000000000000405
Eric Nickel, Alana Y. Cataldo, Nicole Walker, Christine Santa Ana, Kyle Barrons, A. Gravely, Barry D. Hand, A. Hansen
{"title":"Pilot Test of a Definitive Prosthetic Socket Made with 3D Printing Technology","authors":"Eric Nickel, Alana Y. Cataldo, Nicole Walker, Christine Santa Ana, Kyle Barrons, A. Gravely, Barry D. Hand, A. Hansen","doi":"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Additive manufacturing (also known as 3D printing) as a fabrication method is ideally suited to merging the organic shapes of human anatomy with engineered components. Many early adopters are exploring the application of these technologies for the fabrication of 3D-printed sockets, but questions remain regarding the ability to fabricate strong, well-fitting definitive sockets. The goal of the present study was to examine the real-world effect of using 3D-printed sockets with regards to mobility, comfort, balance confidence, and user acceptance. Materials and Methods Nine veterans with transtibial amputations participated in the study, three each using pin, sealing sleeve, or seal-in liner for suspension. Participants had their conventional definitive socket duplicated using 3D printing. When the 3D-printed socket was ready, using their conventional socket, participants performed a 2-minute walk test, followed by socket comfort score and rating of perceived exertion (10-point scale), Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility, Activities-Specific Balance Confidence, select subscales of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire, and the Amputee Body Image Scale–Revised. After completing the baseline data, participants were fitted with the 3D-printed socket and, after using it for 2 weeks, we repeated the data collection. Results Three participants were not able to complete the study. No large differences were observed for any of the measures. Participants were generally satisfied with the fit of the 3D-printed sockets, but there were challenges with getting the 3D-printed sockets to support elevated vacuum with the sealing sleeve and seal-in liner suspension methods. Conclusions No differences in performance or user acceptance were identified for pin suspension, but the 3D-printed sockets were not able to reliably support suction or elevated vacuum; further development will be needed before they are ready for clinical application. Clinical Relevance The present study has demonstrated the ability to achieve satisfactory fit and outcomes using 3D printing to fabricate definitive prosthetic sockets, but the printing method was unable to deliver consistent air-tight sealing for suction or elevated vacuum suspension. Other 3D printing methods and some secondary processing steps may be able to correct this deficiency.","PeriodicalId":53702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","volume":"35 1","pages":"55 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Additive manufacturing (also known as 3D printing) as a fabrication method is ideally suited to merging the organic shapes of human anatomy with engineered components. Many early adopters are exploring the application of these technologies for the fabrication of 3D-printed sockets, but questions remain regarding the ability to fabricate strong, well-fitting definitive sockets. The goal of the present study was to examine the real-world effect of using 3D-printed sockets with regards to mobility, comfort, balance confidence, and user acceptance. Materials and Methods Nine veterans with transtibial amputations participated in the study, three each using pin, sealing sleeve, or seal-in liner for suspension. Participants had their conventional definitive socket duplicated using 3D printing. When the 3D-printed socket was ready, using their conventional socket, participants performed a 2-minute walk test, followed by socket comfort score and rating of perceived exertion (10-point scale), Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility, Activities-Specific Balance Confidence, select subscales of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire, and the Amputee Body Image Scale–Revised. After completing the baseline data, participants were fitted with the 3D-printed socket and, after using it for 2 weeks, we repeated the data collection. Results Three participants were not able to complete the study. No large differences were observed for any of the measures. Participants were generally satisfied with the fit of the 3D-printed sockets, but there were challenges with getting the 3D-printed sockets to support elevated vacuum with the sealing sleeve and seal-in liner suspension methods. Conclusions No differences in performance or user acceptance were identified for pin suspension, but the 3D-printed sockets were not able to reliably support suction or elevated vacuum; further development will be needed before they are ready for clinical application. Clinical Relevance The present study has demonstrated the ability to achieve satisfactory fit and outcomes using 3D printing to fabricate definitive prosthetic sockets, but the printing method was unable to deliver consistent air-tight sealing for suction or elevated vacuum suspension. Other 3D printing methods and some secondary processing steps may be able to correct this deficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3D打印技术制作的确定性假肢插座的中试
摘要简介增材制造(也称为3D打印)作为一种制造方法,非常适合将人体解剖结构的有机形状与工程部件相结合。许多早期采用者正在探索将这些技术应用于3D打印插座的制造,但制造坚固、合身的最终插座的能力仍然存在问题。本研究的目的是检验使用3D打印插座在移动性、舒适性、平衡信心和用户接受度方面的真实世界效果。材料和方法9名经胫骨截肢的退伍军人参与了这项研究,其中3人分别使用销钉、密封套或密封衬垫进行悬吊。参与者使用3D打印复制他们的传统定型插座。当3D打印的插座准备好后,参与者使用他们的传统插座进行了2分钟的步行测试,然后进行插座舒适度评分和感知用力评分(10分量表)、假肢使用者行动能力调查、活动特定平衡置信度、假肢评估问卷的选择分量表和截肢身体图像量表——修订版。在完成基线数据后,参与者安装3D打印插座,在使用2周后,我们重复数据收集。结果三名参与者未能完成研究。在任何一项测量中都没有观察到大的差异。参与者通常对3D打印插座的贴合度感到满意,但要让3D打印插座用密封套和衬垫悬挂密封方法支撑高真空度,也存在挑战。结论针悬挂在性能或用户接受度方面没有发现差异,但3D打印的插座不能可靠地支持抽吸或提高真空度;在它们准备用于临床应用之前,还需要进一步的开发。临床相关性目前的研究已经证明,使用3D打印来制造确定的假肢插座能够实现令人满意的贴合度和结果,但打印方法无法为抽吸或真空悬浮提供一致的气密密封。其他3D打印方法和一些二次处理步骤可能能够纠正这种缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Published quarterly by the AAOP, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics provides information on new devices, fitting and fabrication techniques, and patient management experiences. The focus is on prosthetics and orthotics, with timely reports from related fields such as orthopaedic research, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopaedic surgery, amputation surgery, physical medicine, biomedical engineering, psychology, ethics, and gait analysis. Each issue contains research-based articles reviewed and approved by a highly qualified editorial board and an Academy self-study quiz offering two PCE''s.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Physical Therapy and Orthosis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis Blood Pressure Regulation in Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation: Effects of Wearing a Prosthesis Motion Analysis of a Frontal Plane Adaptable Prosthetic Foot Immediate Effect of Soft Lumbosacral Orthosis on Trunk Stability and Upper-Limb Functionality in Children with Cerebral Palsy Importance of Health Policy and Systems Research for Strengthening Rehabilitation in Health Systems: A Call to Action to Accelerate Progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1