Open Badges for Promoting Open Practices in the Institutional Repository: A Pilot Project

C. Hurrell, K. Ruddock, Paul R. Pival
{"title":"Open Badges for Promoting Open Practices in the Institutional Repository: A Pilot Project","authors":"C. Hurrell, K. Ruddock, Paul R. Pival","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION This paper describes a pilot project conducted at a mid-sized research university to integrate an Open Badge into the institutional repository (IR) alongside research articles. The Open Badge was intended to indicate that the research article in question complies with a national funders’ open access (OA) policy. METHODS This study employed a two-step process to investigate the value of badges: first, researchers were surveyed to ask their opinions about using badges in the IR; second, user testing was done with a small group of researchers to assess whether badges are easy to apply during the process of depositing an article to the IR. RESULTS A minority of respondents to the survey indicated that they saw value in an open badge. Participants in the testing component revealed several areas where the overall interface to the IR submission process could be improved. DISCUSSION It was clear that there are opportunities to promote open practices relating to national funders’ open access policy in our sample. However, any incentive represented by an open badge may be overshadowed if the infrastructure in which it is presented is not sufficiently streamlined. CONCLUSION Scholars are not willing to spend much, if any, additional time to indicate compliance with an open access policy. Adding an open badge was neither an incentive nor a disincentive for promoting open practices.","PeriodicalId":91322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication","volume":"8 1","pages":"2325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION This paper describes a pilot project conducted at a mid-sized research university to integrate an Open Badge into the institutional repository (IR) alongside research articles. The Open Badge was intended to indicate that the research article in question complies with a national funders’ open access (OA) policy. METHODS This study employed a two-step process to investigate the value of badges: first, researchers were surveyed to ask their opinions about using badges in the IR; second, user testing was done with a small group of researchers to assess whether badges are easy to apply during the process of depositing an article to the IR. RESULTS A minority of respondents to the survey indicated that they saw value in an open badge. Participants in the testing component revealed several areas where the overall interface to the IR submission process could be improved. DISCUSSION It was clear that there are opportunities to promote open practices relating to national funders’ open access policy in our sample. However, any incentive represented by an open badge may be overshadowed if the infrastructure in which it is presented is not sufficiently streamlined. CONCLUSION Scholars are not willing to spend much, if any, additional time to indicate compliance with an open access policy. Adding an open badge was neither an incentive nor a disincentive for promoting open practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推广机构知识库开放实践的开放徽章:试点项目
引言本文描述了一个在中型研究型大学进行的试点项目,该项目旨在将开放徽章与研究文章一起整合到机构知识库(IR)中。开放徽章旨在表明有问题的研究文章符合国家资助者的开放获取(OA)政策。方法本研究采用两个步骤来调查徽章的价值:首先,调查研究人员,询问他们对在IR中使用徽章的意见;其次,由一小群研究人员进行了用户测试,以评估在将文章存放到IR的过程中徽章是否易于使用。结果少数受访者表示,他们认为开放徽章有价值。测试部分的参与者揭示了可以改进IR提交过程的整体接口的几个领域。讨论很明显,在我们的样本中,有机会推广与国家资助者开放获取政策相关的开放实践。然而,如果开放徽章所代表的基础设施没有充分精简,那么开放徽章所体现的任何激励措施都可能被掩盖。结论学者们不愿意花费太多(如果有的话)额外的时间来表明他们遵守了开放获取政策。增加开放徽章既不是促进开放做法的动机,也不是抑制开放做法的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Book review: Open access in theory and practice: The theory-practice relationship and openness. Open Access with Chinese Characteristics: Understanding Recent History and Current Practice via Qualitative Interviews at a Large Chinese Research University Research Productivity among Scholarly Communication Librarians Increasing Access to Graduate Student Publishing Support: A Case Study of Reformatting the Publishing Academy Free and Open Source Automated Open Access Preprint Harvesting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1