Clinical Correlation of Reflux Finding Score with Reflux Symptom Index in Diagnosis & Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflex Disease in A Tertiary Care Hospital, Western Up

IF 0.2 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY ENT Updates Pub Date : 2021-04-27 DOI:10.5152/ENTUPDATES.2021.867913
Sushil Gaur, Akshay S Panakkal, Udita Arora, Vandana Singh
{"title":"Clinical Correlation of Reflux Finding Score with Reflux Symptom Index in Diagnosis & Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflex Disease in A Tertiary Care Hospital, Western Up","authors":"Sushil Gaur, Akshay S Panakkal, Udita Arora, Vandana Singh","doi":"10.5152/ENTUPDATES.2021.867913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The retrograde flow of gastric contents to the upper aerodigestive tract is known as laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). It is also known as extraesophageal reflux disease and is a common condition seen in otolaryngology practice. Diagnosis of LPRD is difficult as the patients present with vague and indistinct symptoms. Reflux symptom index (RSI) is a 9-item questionnaire for evaluating symptoms of LPR, whereas the reflux finding score (RFS) is an 8-item clinical severity scale used to interpret the most common larynxgoscopic findings related to LPR. In this study, we aimed to correlate RSI with RFS in symptomatic patients to investigate the reliability of RSI in the diagnosis of LPRD. Methods: In this study, we included100 patients attending the Otorhinolaryngology OPD at Santosh Hospital, Ghaziabad, India, with symptoms suggestive of reflux disease. The patients were asked to fill the RSI scoresheet in the first stage and patients with RSI >13 were chosen for the study. A total of 81 patients were chosen and exam-ined by video-assisted 70° direct laryngoscopy to determine the RFS. The correlation between RSI and RFS were investigated. Result: The study group included 81 patients presented with various symptoms of LPR. Upon investigating further with RFS and RSI we observed that only 7 patients of 81 had a positive score on RSI with a negative score on RFS. Conclusion: According to the results of our study, RSI scoring alone is a fast and reliable method for the evaluation and diagnosis of LPR. Our study shows a high correlation between RSI scoring and RFS.","PeriodicalId":41744,"journal":{"name":"ENT Updates","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENT Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/ENTUPDATES.2021.867913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: The retrograde flow of gastric contents to the upper aerodigestive tract is known as laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). It is also known as extraesophageal reflux disease and is a common condition seen in otolaryngology practice. Diagnosis of LPRD is difficult as the patients present with vague and indistinct symptoms. Reflux symptom index (RSI) is a 9-item questionnaire for evaluating symptoms of LPR, whereas the reflux finding score (RFS) is an 8-item clinical severity scale used to interpret the most common larynxgoscopic findings related to LPR. In this study, we aimed to correlate RSI with RFS in symptomatic patients to investigate the reliability of RSI in the diagnosis of LPRD. Methods: In this study, we included100 patients attending the Otorhinolaryngology OPD at Santosh Hospital, Ghaziabad, India, with symptoms suggestive of reflux disease. The patients were asked to fill the RSI scoresheet in the first stage and patients with RSI >13 were chosen for the study. A total of 81 patients were chosen and exam-ined by video-assisted 70° direct laryngoscopy to determine the RFS. The correlation between RSI and RFS were investigated. Result: The study group included 81 patients presented with various symptoms of LPR. Upon investigating further with RFS and RSI we observed that only 7 patients of 81 had a positive score on RSI with a negative score on RFS. Conclusion: According to the results of our study, RSI scoring alone is a fast and reliable method for the evaluation and diagnosis of LPR. Our study shows a high correlation between RSI scoring and RFS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反流发现评分与反流症状指数在西部某三甲医院诊断和治疗咽返流病中的临床相关性
目的:胃内容物逆流到上气消化道被称为喉咽反流病(LPRD)。它也被称为食管外反流病,是耳鼻喉科常见的疾病。LPRD的诊断是困难的,因为患者表现出模糊和不明显的症状。反流症状指数(RSI)是一份9项问卷,用于评估LPR的症状,而反流发现评分(RFS)是一个8项临床严重程度量表,用于解释与LPR相关的最常见的喉镜检查结果。在本研究中,我们旨在将有症状患者的RSI与RFS相关联,以研究RSI在LPRD诊断中的可靠性。方法:在这项研究中,我们纳入了100名在印度加齐阿巴德Santosh医院耳鼻喉科门诊就诊的患者,他们的症状提示有反流疾病。患者被要求在第一阶段填写RSI评分表,并选择RSI>13的患者进行研究。共选择81名患者,并通过电视辅助70°直接喉镜检查来确定RFS。研究RSI与RFS的相关性。结果:研究组包括81例出现各种LPR症状的患者。在进一步研究RFS和RSI后,我们观察到81名患者中只有7名患者的RSI评分为阳性,RFS评分为阴性。结论:根据我们的研究结果,单独的RSI评分是评估和诊断LPR的一种快速可靠的方法。我们的研究表明RSI评分与RFS之间存在高度相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ENT Updates
ENT Updates OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Frankie Valli: How Stapes Surgery Saved His Career Domenico Cotugno (1736-1822), Antonio Scarpa (1752-1832), and Alfonso Corti (1822-1876): The Most Important Discoveries of the Inner Ear Made by Young Italian Physicians—Domenico Cotugno Association of Face Mask Use With Nasal Symptoms And Mucociliary Clearance Examination of the Clinic, Radiologic, and Demographic Characteristics of 436 Patients with Nasal Fracture Ear Nose Throat Foreign Bodies in Children: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1