Linking sustainability and happiness. What kind of happiness?

IF 0.7 Q3 GEOGRAPHY GeoScape Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.2478/geosc-2020-0007
F. Petrovič, F. Murgaš
{"title":"Linking sustainability and happiness. What kind of happiness?","authors":"F. Petrovič, F. Murgaš","doi":"10.2478/geosc-2020-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Sustainability is part of the scientific mainstream; in the following paper we connect it with the phenomenon of happiness, which is becoming a discussed concept not only among researchers but also amongst public. This is due to the fact that today’s society has become a consumer society. This knowledge has provoked criticism of the prevailing lifestyle. The unprecedented growth of prosperity in the second half of the last century and at the beginning of the 21st century was achieved at the cost of environmental devastation. This presented the urgent question of how to improve the quality of life or bring happiness to a growing number of people. At the same time, efforts to replace GDP as a general measure of development with quality of life began to grow. In connection with happiness, it is important that it is defined in two ways: hedonic or eudaimonic. The aim of the paper is to find out which form of happiness is sustainable on the basis of the analysis of relevant works. Happiness is understood as part of the subjective dimension of quality of life, it represents the highest level of well-being. The combination of sustainability and quality of life or happiness is not new, some authors consider quality of life as the fourth pillar of sustainability. A key criterion for assessing which happiness is sustainable and which is not is the following assumption: The happiness of us – contemporaries − cannot be achieved at the expense of future generations. The knowledge-which of the forms is sustainable - is the result of the analysis of both forms of happiness.","PeriodicalId":42291,"journal":{"name":"GeoScape","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeoScape","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2020-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Abstract Sustainability is part of the scientific mainstream; in the following paper we connect it with the phenomenon of happiness, which is becoming a discussed concept not only among researchers but also amongst public. This is due to the fact that today’s society has become a consumer society. This knowledge has provoked criticism of the prevailing lifestyle. The unprecedented growth of prosperity in the second half of the last century and at the beginning of the 21st century was achieved at the cost of environmental devastation. This presented the urgent question of how to improve the quality of life or bring happiness to a growing number of people. At the same time, efforts to replace GDP as a general measure of development with quality of life began to grow. In connection with happiness, it is important that it is defined in two ways: hedonic or eudaimonic. The aim of the paper is to find out which form of happiness is sustainable on the basis of the analysis of relevant works. Happiness is understood as part of the subjective dimension of quality of life, it represents the highest level of well-being. The combination of sustainability and quality of life or happiness is not new, some authors consider quality of life as the fourth pillar of sustainability. A key criterion for assessing which happiness is sustainable and which is not is the following assumption: The happiness of us – contemporaries − cannot be achieved at the expense of future generations. The knowledge-which of the forms is sustainable - is the result of the analysis of both forms of happiness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将可持续性与幸福联系起来。什么样的幸福?
摘要可持续性是科学主流的一部分;在接下来的文章中,我们将其与幸福现象联系起来,幸福现象不仅在研究人员中,而且在公众中都成为了一个讨论的概念。这是因为今天的社会已经成为一个消费社会。这一认识引发了对主流生活方式的批评。上世纪下半叶和21世纪初前所未有的繁荣增长是以环境破坏为代价实现的。这就提出了如何提高生活质量或为越来越多的人带来幸福的紧迫问题。与此同时,以生活质量取代国内生产总值作为衡量发展的一般指标的努力开始增加。关于幸福,重要的是要用两种方式来定义它:享乐或幸福。本文的目的是在分析相关作品的基础上,找出哪种幸福形式是可持续的。幸福被理解为生活质量的主观维度的一部分,它代表着最高水平的幸福。可持续性与生活质量或幸福感的结合并不是什么新鲜事,一些作者认为生活质量是可持续性的第四支柱。评估哪些幸福是可持续的,哪些不是可持续的一个关键标准是以下假设:我们——同时代人——的幸福不能以牺牲子孙后代为代价。这两种形式中哪一种是可持续的,这是对两种幸福形式分析的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GeoScape
GeoScape GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Visualising administrative division dynamics: transformation of borders and names in the Bohemian-Saxonian borderland Assessing current use and visions for sacral complexes in a landscape: An example from Central Europe Measuring the Gender Gap Index using socio-economic variability: A case study based on Modified Global Gender Gap Index (Sehore Municipal Council, India) Differentiation of developmental priorities of different-sized municipalities in the period of acceleration of developmental changes – an example of a mining region Provision of post construction support (PCS) services to state water authorities in Nigeria: constraints and the way forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1