In the Name of the Battle Against Piracy: Ideas and Practices in State Monopoly of Maritime Violence in Europe and Asia in the Period of Transition by Ota Atsushi (review)

S. Abel
{"title":"In the Name of the Battle Against Piracy: Ideas and Practices in State Monopoly of Maritime Violence in Europe and Asia in the Period of Transition by Ota Atsushi (review)","authors":"S. Abel","doi":"10.1353/ras.2021.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this age of eBooks and digital resources, it is perhaps not surprising to discover that Sutherland’s book has an associated website. This site, portrayed by Sutherland as ‘a digital appendix’, displays maps, drawings and photographs accessed from institutions around the globe. Originally created as part of the contemporary documentary record of archipelagic Southeast Asia, these primacysource visual materials are a genuine complement to Sutherland’s text, giving readers an additional insight to the diversity of the region. In her introduction to the website, Sutherland surveys the many sources used to bring it into being. As well as providing information on where to access historical images and maps, she also outlines the growing number of online sources that provide free access to digital versions of historic texts, including newspapers, articles. and books. This is of great use to the student and researcher, but it should be stressed that the website is an additional resource and not an essential adjunct to the book, which carries forty-seven images of its own and twenty-three maps, the latter created or adapted specially to enhance the text. For such a large book, there are few obvious spelling errors. There is some confusion, however, about modern and historical place names and terminology with, for example, Melaka and Malacca, Sulawesi Sea and Celebes Sea, and turtle shell and tortoiseshell, all used apparently at random. Meanwhile, considering the complexity of the narrative, it appears internally consistent to an astonishing degree, although we are told that Kupang became the Portuguese base on Timor in 1657, and on the next page we learn that the VOC was established there in the same year. Several pages further on, the correct information is given that Kupang was occupied by the Dutch in 1653 (pp. 172–73, 207). The errors here are due to incorrect information contained in secondary sources. Elsewhere, however, in a list of Bima’s trading partners, the Australian-born Sutherland surprisingly identifies Port Jackson as Melbourne (p. 329). Don’t tell that to the people in Sydney. These are all minor quibbles, however. This is an attractive and well-laid-out book. Sutherland’s scholarship has created a masterful work that will be appreciated by all interested in maritime Southeast Asia’s colonial and pre-colonial past. It is to be hoped that Sutherland’s example will encourage others to do more research in this field, but it is beyond doubt that the present work will remain the preeminent study of the subject for many years to come.","PeriodicalId":39524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society","volume":" ","pages":"232 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ras.2021.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this age of eBooks and digital resources, it is perhaps not surprising to discover that Sutherland’s book has an associated website. This site, portrayed by Sutherland as ‘a digital appendix’, displays maps, drawings and photographs accessed from institutions around the globe. Originally created as part of the contemporary documentary record of archipelagic Southeast Asia, these primacysource visual materials are a genuine complement to Sutherland’s text, giving readers an additional insight to the diversity of the region. In her introduction to the website, Sutherland surveys the many sources used to bring it into being. As well as providing information on where to access historical images and maps, she also outlines the growing number of online sources that provide free access to digital versions of historic texts, including newspapers, articles. and books. This is of great use to the student and researcher, but it should be stressed that the website is an additional resource and not an essential adjunct to the book, which carries forty-seven images of its own and twenty-three maps, the latter created or adapted specially to enhance the text. For such a large book, there are few obvious spelling errors. There is some confusion, however, about modern and historical place names and terminology with, for example, Melaka and Malacca, Sulawesi Sea and Celebes Sea, and turtle shell and tortoiseshell, all used apparently at random. Meanwhile, considering the complexity of the narrative, it appears internally consistent to an astonishing degree, although we are told that Kupang became the Portuguese base on Timor in 1657, and on the next page we learn that the VOC was established there in the same year. Several pages further on, the correct information is given that Kupang was occupied by the Dutch in 1653 (pp. 172–73, 207). The errors here are due to incorrect information contained in secondary sources. Elsewhere, however, in a list of Bima’s trading partners, the Australian-born Sutherland surprisingly identifies Port Jackson as Melbourne (p. 329). Don’t tell that to the people in Sydney. These are all minor quibbles, however. This is an attractive and well-laid-out book. Sutherland’s scholarship has created a masterful work that will be appreciated by all interested in maritime Southeast Asia’s colonial and pre-colonial past. It is to be hoped that Sutherland’s example will encourage others to do more research in this field, but it is beyond doubt that the present work will remain the preeminent study of the subject for many years to come.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《以反海盗之名:转型期欧亚国家垄断海上暴力的理念与实践》作者:Ota Atsushi(综述)
在这个电子书和数字资源的时代,发现萨瑟兰的书有一个相关的网站也许并不奇怪。该网站被萨瑟兰描述为“数字附录”,展示了从全球机构获取的地图、图纸和照片。这些原始来源的视觉材料最初是作为东南亚群岛当代纪录片记录的一部分创作的,是对萨瑟兰文本的真正补充,让读者对该地区的多样性有了更多的了解。在对该网站的介绍中,萨瑟兰调查了促成该网站的许多来源。除了提供在哪里访问历史图像和地图的信息外,她还概述了越来越多的在线资源,这些资源提供免费访问历史文本的数字版本,包括报纸、文章。和书籍。这对学生和研究人员来说非常有用,但应该强调的是,该网站是一种额外的资源,而不是本书的重要附件,本书载有47张自己的图像和23张地图,后者是专门为增强文本而创建或改编的。对于这么大的一本书来说,几乎没有明显的拼写错误。然而,在现代和历史地名和术语方面存在一些混乱,例如,马六甲和马六甲、苏拉威西海和西里伯斯海,以及龟甲和龟甲,所有这些显然都是随机使用的。同时,考虑到叙述的复杂性,它在内部似乎达到了惊人的程度,尽管我们被告知库邦于1657年成为葡萄牙在帝汶的基地,在下一页我们了解到VOC于同年在那里成立。几页之后,给出了正确的信息,即库庞于1653年被荷兰人占领(第172-73207页)。此处的错误是由于次要来源中包含的信息不正确造成的。然而,在比马的其他贸易伙伴名单中,出生于澳大利亚的萨瑟兰出人意料地将杰克逊港认定为墨尔本(第329页)。不要对悉尼的人说这些。然而,这些都是小问题。这是一本引人入胜、布局优美的书。萨瑟兰的学术成就成就了一部杰作,将受到所有对东南亚殖民地和前殖民地历史感兴趣的人的赞赏。希望萨瑟兰的例子能鼓励其他人在这一领域进行更多的研究,但毫无疑问,在未来的许多年里,目前的工作仍将是这一主题的卓越研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
James Carnegy and the ‘Country Trade’ in Penang, c.1802–1824 History in the Malaysian Public Sphere The Comfort Women of Singapore in History and Memory by Kevin Blackburn (review) An Illustrious Heritage: The History of Tan Tock Seng and Family ed. by Kua Bak Lim, Lim How Seng and Roney Tan (review) Belitung, the afterlives of a shipwreck by Natali Pearson (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1