Evaluating Learning Outcomes and Assessing Social Work Skill Development: Comparing Online vs. In-Person Education

K. Canada, R. Freese, Rachel M. Bailey, D. Fitch
{"title":"Evaluating Learning Outcomes and Assessing Social Work Skill Development: Comparing Online vs. In-Person Education","authors":"K. Canada, R. Freese, Rachel M. Bailey, D. Fitch","doi":"10.1080/15228835.2021.1997693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article presents results from an evaluation of learning outcomes in a social work skills class between online and in-person students. Students were compared on background and academic factors, including grade point average prior to graduate school, time since completion of undergraduate education, undergraduate degree, and previous work and training in social services. Students also completed a skills self-assessment at the beginning of the class and upon completion. Data used to measure learning outcomes included total points earned and grades. Data were also collected from instructors’ field notes and observations. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses, including one way and repeated measure ANOVA. Online students perceived they entered the class with more skills but no differences existed at the post-assessment. Minimal differences existed in students’ scores on major assignments except the bio-psycho-social assessment; in-person students scored higher. Instructors identified rapport building online as challenging. Results suggest parity of online and in-person learning. It is important to continue researching which students do best in--online and in-person coursework--in order to assist students in making the best choices for their learning preferences.","PeriodicalId":46115,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES","volume":"40 1","pages":"47 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2021.1997693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article presents results from an evaluation of learning outcomes in a social work skills class between online and in-person students. Students were compared on background and academic factors, including grade point average prior to graduate school, time since completion of undergraduate education, undergraduate degree, and previous work and training in social services. Students also completed a skills self-assessment at the beginning of the class and upon completion. Data used to measure learning outcomes included total points earned and grades. Data were also collected from instructors’ field notes and observations. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses, including one way and repeated measure ANOVA. Online students perceived they entered the class with more skills but no differences existed at the post-assessment. Minimal differences existed in students’ scores on major assignments except the bio-psycho-social assessment; in-person students scored higher. Instructors identified rapport building online as challenging. Results suggest parity of online and in-person learning. It is important to continue researching which students do best in--online and in-person coursework--in order to assist students in making the best choices for their learning preferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估学习成果和评估社会工作技能发展:在线教育与面对面教育的比较
摘要本文介绍了在线和面对面学生在社会工作技能课上的学习结果评估结果。对学生的背景和学业因素进行了比较,包括研究生院前的平均绩点、完成本科教育后的时间、本科学位以及以前在社会服务部门的工作和培训。学生们还在课程开始时和完成后完成了技能自我评估。用于衡量学习成绩的数据包括获得的总分和成绩。还从教员的实地笔记和观察中收集了数据。使用描述性统计和双变量分析对数据进行分析,包括单向和重复测量方差分析。在线学生认为他们进入课堂时掌握了更多的技能,但在后评估中没有差异。除生物-心理-社会评估外,学生在主要作业中的得分差异极小;面对面的学生得分更高。讲师们认为在线建立融洽关系具有挑战性。研究结果表明,在线学习和面对面学习不相上下。重要的是要继续研究哪些学生在网上和面对面的课程中表现最好,以帮助学生根据自己的学习偏好做出最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed, refereed journal explores the potentials of computer and telecommunications technologies in mental health, developmental disability, welfare, addictions, education, and other human services. The Journal of Technology in Human Services covers the full range of technological applications, including direct service techniques. It not only provides the necessary historical perspectives on the use of computers in the human service field, but it also presents articles that will improve your technology literacy and keep you abreast of state-of-the-art developments.
期刊最新文献
Development of the Mobile Application to Prevent Suicide (MAPS), a Personalized Smartphone App for Suicide Prevention: Feedback from Individual Interviews Online Employment Services for Immigrant Professionals: An Environmental Scan Experiences of Older Adult Volunteers and Nursing Simulation Coordinators in a Graduate-Level Primary Care Telehealth Simulation: Benefits, Facilitators, and Volunteer Management Considerations The Use of Online Medical Record Functionalities in Older Adulthood: The Role of Use Encouragement and Access Frequency An Information Acquisition Approach on How Young Adults Search for Mental Health Professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1