Deriving the Derivative

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Signs and Society Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1086/695408
Benjamin Lee
{"title":"Deriving the Derivative","authors":"Benjamin Lee","doi":"10.1086/695408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The anthropology of finance has been dominated by ethnographic field research and the performativity thesis advanced by Donald Mackenzie and Michel Callon. This essay takes a different tack and proposes a semiotic framework to look at the central concept in derivative finance, that of volatility. Volatility has also been increasingly important in our contemporary culture and politics of volatility, suggesting that the implications of the concept touch upon far more than just finance. I trace the development of the Black-Scholes model for pricing options from its initial use as a foundation for a “physics of finance” to its current use to calculate the “implied volatility” of trillions of dollars of derivative contracts on a daily basis. At the same time, the use of Black-Scholes to calculate implied volatility violates one of the fundamental presuppositions of the model, and I argue that instead of being part of a “physics of finance,” Black-Scholes now functions more like the discourse-indexical component of a “leaky grammar of prices.”","PeriodicalId":51908,"journal":{"name":"Signs and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/695408","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signs and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/695408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The anthropology of finance has been dominated by ethnographic field research and the performativity thesis advanced by Donald Mackenzie and Michel Callon. This essay takes a different tack and proposes a semiotic framework to look at the central concept in derivative finance, that of volatility. Volatility has also been increasingly important in our contemporary culture and politics of volatility, suggesting that the implications of the concept touch upon far more than just finance. I trace the development of the Black-Scholes model for pricing options from its initial use as a foundation for a “physics of finance” to its current use to calculate the “implied volatility” of trillions of dollars of derivative contracts on a daily basis. At the same time, the use of Black-Scholes to calculate implied volatility violates one of the fundamental presuppositions of the model, and I argue that instead of being part of a “physics of finance,” Black-Scholes now functions more like the discourse-indexical component of a “leaky grammar of prices.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衍生衍生工具
金融人类学一直以人种学领域研究和唐纳德·麦肯齐和米歇尔·卡隆提出的表演性论文为主。本文采取了不同的策略,并提出了一个符号学框架来看待衍生金融的核心概念,即波动性。波动性在我们当代的波动性文化和政治中也变得越来越重要,这表明这个概念的含义远远不止涉及金融。我追踪了期权定价的Black-Scholes模型的发展,从最初用作“金融物理学”的基础,到目前每天用于计算数万亿美元衍生合约的“隐含波动性”。与此同时,使用Black-Scholes来计算隐含波动性违反了该模型的一个基本前提,我认为,Black-Schores现在的功能更像是“泄漏的价格语法”的话语指数组成部分,而不是“金融物理学”的一部分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Signs and Society
Signs and Society Multiple-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
From Transcendence to Kitsch: Have We Lost Faith? Enregistering Grammatical Gender: Indexing Brabantishness through Languagecultural Practices in Digital Tiles Signs of Solidarity and Difference: Kaçak Tea, Samimiyet, and the National Public in Turkey An Unheard Voice: The Paintings of Zohar Tal Inbar, a Mother Looking at Her Soldier Son The Enregisterment of Luxembourgish Standards in the Nineteenth Century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1