A hybrid system to predict brain stroke using a combined feature selection and classifier

IF 4.4 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Intelligent medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.imed.2023.06.002
Priyanka Bathla, Rajneesh Kumar
{"title":"A hybrid system to predict brain stroke using a combined feature selection and classifier","authors":"Priyanka Bathla,&nbsp;Rajneesh Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.imed.2023.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Brain stroke is a serious health issue that requires timely and accurate prediction for effective treatment and prevention. This study described a hybrid system that used the best feature selection method and classifier to predict brain stroke.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Stroke Prediction Dataset from Kaggle was used for this study. Synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) analysis was used to accomplish class balancing. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and the F-Measure were the main performance parameters considered for investigation. To determine the best combination for predicting brain stroke, the performance of five classifiers, Naïve Bayes (NB), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (Adaboost), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), was compared along with three feature selection techniques, mutual information (MI), Pearson correlation (PC), and feature importance (FI). The performance parameters were assessed using k-fold cross-validation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The hybrid system proposed in this study identified a reduced set of features that were able to effectively predict brain stroke. FI provided a feature reduction ratio of 36.3%. The most successful hybrid system for predicting brain stroke used FI as the feature selection technique and RF as the classifier, achieving an accuracy of 97.17%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The proposed system predicted brain stroke with high accuracy. These findings could be used to inform the early detection and prevention of brain stroke, allowing healthcare professionals to provide timely and targeted care to at-risk patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73400,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent medicine","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 75-82"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266710262300058X/pdfft?md5=0f0ee3d2b045cfcda2c84f99bb898a5e&pid=1-s2.0-S266710262300058X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266710262300058X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Brain stroke is a serious health issue that requires timely and accurate prediction for effective treatment and prevention. This study described a hybrid system that used the best feature selection method and classifier to predict brain stroke.

Methods

The Stroke Prediction Dataset from Kaggle was used for this study. Synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) analysis was used to accomplish class balancing. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and the F-Measure were the main performance parameters considered for investigation. To determine the best combination for predicting brain stroke, the performance of five classifiers, Naïve Bayes (NB), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (Adaboost), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), was compared along with three feature selection techniques, mutual information (MI), Pearson correlation (PC), and feature importance (FI). The performance parameters were assessed using k-fold cross-validation.

Results

The hybrid system proposed in this study identified a reduced set of features that were able to effectively predict brain stroke. FI provided a feature reduction ratio of 36.3%. The most successful hybrid system for predicting brain stroke used FI as the feature selection technique and RF as the classifier, achieving an accuracy of 97.17%.

Conclusion

The proposed system predicted brain stroke with high accuracy. These findings could be used to inform the early detection and prevention of brain stroke, allowing healthcare professionals to provide timely and targeted care to at-risk patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种使用特征选择和分类器组合预测脑卒中的混合系统
背景脑中风是一个严重的健康问题,需要及时准确的预测才能有效治疗和预防。本研究介绍了一种混合系统,该系统使用最佳特征选择方法和分类器来预测脑中风。本研究使用了 Kaggle 中的脑卒中预测数据集,并使用合成少数群体过度采样技术(SMOTE)分析来实现类平衡。准确度、灵敏度、特异性、精确度和 F-Measure 是考察的主要性能参数。为了确定预测脑中风的最佳组合,比较了奈夫贝叶斯(NB)、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)、自适应增强(Adaboost)和极梯度增强(XGBoost)这五种分类器的性能,以及互信息(MI)、皮尔逊相关(PC)和特征重要性(FI)这三种特征选择技术。结果本研究提出的混合系统识别出了一组能够有效预测脑中风的精简特征。FI 提供了 36.3% 的特征缩减率。预测脑中风最成功的混合系统使用 FI 作为特征选择技术,RF 作为分类器,准确率达到 97.17%。这些发现可用于脑中风的早期检测和预防,使医护人员能够为高危患者提供及时和有针对性的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligent medicine
Intelligent medicine Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Impact of data balancing a multiclass dataset before the creation of association rules to study bacterial vaginosis Neuropsychological detection and prediction using machine learning algorithms: a comprehensive review Improved neurological diagnoses and treatment strategies via automated human brain tissue segmentation from clinical magnetic resonance imaging Increasing the accuracy and reproducibility of positron emission tomography radiomics for predicting pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer using 3D local binary pattern-based texture features A clinical decision support system using rough set theory and machine learning for disease prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1