Selecting near-infrared reflection spectroscopy pretreatment methods by chemical components valid and invalid absorption wavebands

IF 1.1 4区 化学 Q3 SPECTROSCOPY Spectroscopy Letters Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI:10.1080/00387010.2022.2136200
Tiancheng Huang, Guimin Cai, Hubin Liu, Zhiyue Feng, Longlian Zhao, Junhui Li
{"title":"Selecting near-infrared reflection spectroscopy pretreatment methods by chemical components valid and invalid absorption wavebands","authors":"Tiancheng Huang, Guimin Cai, Hubin Liu, Zhiyue Feng, Longlian Zhao, Junhui Li","doi":"10.1080/00387010.2022.2136200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An appropriate pretreatment method is crucial to establish a reliable model for near-infrared spectroscopy. It is usually selected by comparing model performance with different pretreatment methods, such as the root mean square error of internal cross-validation or the root mean square error of prediction. When the statistical indexes of the models are similar and indistinguishable, or the results of model calibration and cross-validation are too different, indicating an overfitting situation, it may be due to the selection of an inappropriate pretreatment. In this paper, an approach is proposed to select appropriate pretreatment methods by chemical components valid and invalid absorption wavebands. Due to there being no chemical groups absorption in wavebands of 1250–1350 nm and 1780–1850 nm, they are considered chemical invalid absorption bands. The root mean square distance in the invalid wavebands characterizes the difference in samples’ physical state, such as particle size and instrument error. Except for the invalid absorption band, other wavebands in the near-infrared region are considered chemical valid absorption wavebands. The root mean square distance in the valid absorption wavebands mainly characterize the chemical composition differences between different samples. So, we define effective information rate of spectra. The larger effective information rate of spectra, the more favorable it is to establish a quantitative model. In this study, spectra of 60 wheat powder samples were used to compare seven pretreatment methods. Moreover, the average effective information rates of spectra were calculated for the seven pretreatment methods respectively. The results show that the combination of standard normal variate transformation and first derivative with Savitzky–Golay smoothing is the best. Finally, a comparison of model prediction with different pretreatment methods was made. The results are the same as the former. Therefore, using the effective information rate of spectra for selecting an appropriate near-infrared spectroscopy pretreatment method is practical and can be used not only for near-infrared modeling but also for designing near-infrared instruments as an index for optimization.","PeriodicalId":21953,"journal":{"name":"Spectroscopy Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spectroscopy Letters","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00387010.2022.2136200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPECTROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract An appropriate pretreatment method is crucial to establish a reliable model for near-infrared spectroscopy. It is usually selected by comparing model performance with different pretreatment methods, such as the root mean square error of internal cross-validation or the root mean square error of prediction. When the statistical indexes of the models are similar and indistinguishable, or the results of model calibration and cross-validation are too different, indicating an overfitting situation, it may be due to the selection of an inappropriate pretreatment. In this paper, an approach is proposed to select appropriate pretreatment methods by chemical components valid and invalid absorption wavebands. Due to there being no chemical groups absorption in wavebands of 1250–1350 nm and 1780–1850 nm, they are considered chemical invalid absorption bands. The root mean square distance in the invalid wavebands characterizes the difference in samples’ physical state, such as particle size and instrument error. Except for the invalid absorption band, other wavebands in the near-infrared region are considered chemical valid absorption wavebands. The root mean square distance in the valid absorption wavebands mainly characterize the chemical composition differences between different samples. So, we define effective information rate of spectra. The larger effective information rate of spectra, the more favorable it is to establish a quantitative model. In this study, spectra of 60 wheat powder samples were used to compare seven pretreatment methods. Moreover, the average effective information rates of spectra were calculated for the seven pretreatment methods respectively. The results show that the combination of standard normal variate transformation and first derivative with Savitzky–Golay smoothing is the best. Finally, a comparison of model prediction with different pretreatment methods was made. The results are the same as the former. Therefore, using the effective information rate of spectra for selecting an appropriate near-infrared spectroscopy pretreatment method is practical and can be used not only for near-infrared modeling but also for designing near-infrared instruments as an index for optimization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据化学成分有效和无效吸收波段选择近红外反射光谱预处理方法
摘要适当的预处理方法对于建立可靠的近红外光谱模型至关重要。它通常是通过比较不同预处理方法的模型性能来选择的,例如内部交叉验证的均方根误差或预测的均方根错误。当模型的统计指标相似且无法区分,或者模型校准和交叉验证的结果差异过大,表明存在过拟合情况时,可能是由于选择了不适当的预处理。本文提出了一种根据化学成分有效和无效吸收波段来选择合适的预处理方法的方法。由于在1250–1350的波段中没有化学基团吸收 nm和1780–1850 nm,它们被认为是化学无效吸收带。无效波段中的均方根距离表征了样品物理状态的差异,如粒度和仪器误差。除了无效吸收波段外,近红外区域的其他波段都被认为是化学有效吸收波段。有效吸收波段的均方根距离主要表征不同样品之间的化学成分差异。因此,我们定义了光谱的有效信息率。光谱的有效信息率越大,就越有利于建立定量模型。在本研究中,使用60个小麦粉样品的光谱来比较七种预处理方法。此外,分别计算了七种预处理方法的光谱平均有效信息率。结果表明,标准正态变量变换与Savitzky–Golay平滑的一阶导数相结合是最好的。最后,对不同预处理方法的模型预测进行了比较。结果与前者相同。因此,利用光谱的有效信息率来选择合适的近红外光谱预处理方法是可行的,不仅可以用于近红外建模,还可以用于设计近红外仪器作为优化指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spectroscopy Letters
Spectroscopy Letters 物理-光谱学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
50
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: Spectroscopy Letters provides vital coverage of all types of spectroscopy across all the disciplines where they are used—including novel work in fundamental spectroscopy, applications, diagnostics and instrumentation. The audience is intended to be all practicing spectroscopists across all scientific (and some engineering) disciplines, including: physics, chemistry, biology, instrumentation science, and pharmaceutical science.
期刊最新文献
Spectroscopic, computational, docking, and cytotoxicity investigations of 5-chloro-2-mercaptobenzimidazole as an anti-breast cancer medication Ultraviolet visible spectral water chemical oxygen demand detection method based on two deep neural network model Two-dimensional low-field nuclear magnetic resonance approach for the detection of metabolic syndrome in human serum Molecular structure, light harvesting effect, electronic, topological behavior and molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulation of (Z)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(3-(E)-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-oxo prop-1-en-1-yl)-phenyl) prop-2-en-1-one—in-vitro assay Sub-ppm-level detection of nanoplastics using au nanograting and application to disposable plasticware
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1