A model of asymmetric conflict outcome – Sensitivity to friction and choice of strategy in counterinsurgencies

Q3 Social Sciences Comparative Strategy Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI:10.1080/01495933.2022.2130678
Ralf Lillbacka
{"title":"A model of asymmetric conflict outcome – Sensitivity to friction and choice of strategy in counterinsurgencies","authors":"Ralf Lillbacka","doi":"10.1080/01495933.2022.2130678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article assesses a model predicting outcome in counterinsurgencies based on the counterinsurgent’s exposure to external friction and strategy. Unfavorable opinions, as well as insurgents’ access to third-party support and sanctuaries, constitute sources of external friction. Strategies were categorized as mainly kinetic or population-centric. The model predicts: (1) counterinsurgents lose in contexts with high external friction regardless of strategy; (2) counterinsurgents applying a population-centric strategy win if external friction is low; (3) counterinsurgents applying a purely kinetic strategy win if external friction is low only by obtaining distinct tactical superiority. The model correctly predicted 27 of 30 examined cases.","PeriodicalId":35161,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Strategy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2022.2130678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The article assesses a model predicting outcome in counterinsurgencies based on the counterinsurgent’s exposure to external friction and strategy. Unfavorable opinions, as well as insurgents’ access to third-party support and sanctuaries, constitute sources of external friction. Strategies were categorized as mainly kinetic or population-centric. The model predicts: (1) counterinsurgents lose in contexts with high external friction regardless of strategy; (2) counterinsurgents applying a population-centric strategy win if external friction is low; (3) counterinsurgents applying a purely kinetic strategy win if external friction is low only by obtaining distinct tactical superiority. The model correctly predicted 27 of 30 examined cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不对称冲突结果模型——对摩擦的敏感性和反叛乱战略的选择
摘要本文评估了一个基于反叛乱分子暴露于外部摩擦和策略的预测反叛乱结果的模型。不利的意见,以及叛乱分子获得第三方支持和庇护,构成了外部摩擦的根源。战略主要分为动态战略或以人口为中心战略。该模型预测:(1)无论策略如何,反叛乱分子都会在外部摩擦高的情况下失败;(2) 如果外部摩擦很低,采用以人口为中心战略的反叛乱分子就会获胜;(3) 如果只有通过获得明显的战术优势,外部摩擦很低,那么采用纯粹动能战略的反叛乱分子就会获胜。该模型正确预测了30例检查病例中的27例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Strategy
Comparative Strategy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
How many nuclear weapons does Russia have? The size and characteristics of the Russian nuclear stockpile Controlling the capital: Political dominance in the urbanizing worldControlling the capital: Political dominance in the urbanizing world, by Tom Goodfellow and David Jackman, Oxford University Press, (2023), 288 pp, 110$, ISBN: 9780192868329 Morality, strategy, and emotions: What can contemporary psychological research tell us about their relationship? Japan’s potential assistance in South Korea’s nuclear deterrence and defense Lawfare and International Humanitarian Law: A shift in the war experience for Western democracies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1