Potrójna kreacja świata w ujęciu Michała Sędziwoja

Milena Cygan
{"title":"Potrójna kreacja świata w ujęciu Michała Sędziwoja","authors":"Milena Cygan","doi":"10.15633/ss.3519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of the beginning of the world, it’s first rule, genesis and structure followed humanity since the dawn of time, becoming a source for philosophy and science. Search for a rational answer to that question lead, throughout the ages, to a creation of many cosmogonic concepts which referenced various philosophical traditions. While they currently hold only historical value, in many cases they contained ideas, sometimes still very inarticulate, which revolutionized the science in later years. One of such concepts was proposed by Michael Sendivogius, a Renaissance polish alchemist. In his approach, creation of world is dynamic and multiphase. In his vision, the world is something, which is subject to evolution (though he does not use this term), inevitably changes, and thus undergoes a permanent creation. In this creation of the world, as Sendivogius describes it, one can distinguish three fundamental stages, responsible for which are three factors: God, Nature and man. The goal of this article is to present how, according to Sendivogius, the world is created, what tasks in this continuous process are carried out by God, Nature or the man, and in what relations they remain, in regards to themselves and the world they create.","PeriodicalId":30875,"journal":{"name":"Semina Scientiarum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semina Scientiarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15633/ss.3519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of the beginning of the world, it’s first rule, genesis and structure followed humanity since the dawn of time, becoming a source for philosophy and science. Search for a rational answer to that question lead, throughout the ages, to a creation of many cosmogonic concepts which referenced various philosophical traditions. While they currently hold only historical value, in many cases they contained ideas, sometimes still very inarticulate, which revolutionized the science in later years. One of such concepts was proposed by Michael Sendivogius, a Renaissance polish alchemist. In his approach, creation of world is dynamic and multiphase. In his vision, the world is something, which is subject to evolution (though he does not use this term), inevitably changes, and thus undergoes a permanent creation. In this creation of the world, as Sendivogius describes it, one can distinguish three fundamental stages, responsible for which are three factors: God, Nature and man. The goal of this article is to present how, according to Sendivogius, the world is created, what tasks in this continuous process are carried out by God, Nature or the man, and in what relations they remain, in regards to themselves and the world they create.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
米夏·西沃吉视角下的世界三重创造
世界的起源问题,它的第一条规则,起源和结构,自时间之初就遵循着人类,成为哲学和科学的源泉。古往今来,寻找这个问题的合理答案导致了许多宇宙观概念的产生,这些概念引用了各种哲学传统。虽然它们目前只具有历史价值,但在许多情况下,它们包含了一些想法,有时仍然很难表达,这在后来的几年里彻底改变了科学。其中一个概念是由文艺复兴时期的波兰炼金术士迈克尔·森迪沃吉乌斯提出的。在他的方法中,世界的创造是动态的和多阶段的。在他的视野中,世界是一种受进化影响的东西(尽管他没有使用这个词),不可避免地会发生变化,从而经历永久的创造。正如Sendivogius所描述的,在这个世界的创造过程中,人们可以区分三个基本阶段,这三个阶段由三个因素负责:上帝、自然和人。本文的目的是介绍根据Sendivogios的说法,世界是如何被创造的,在这一连续过程中,上帝、自然或人执行了哪些任务,以及它们保持着什么关系,关于他们自己和他们创造的世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Paradygmat obiektowy w oprogramowaniu astronomicznym Człowiek jako wytwór siebie samego. Lem, transhumanizm i dwie koncepcje autentyczności Oświeceniowa wizja nauki w ujęciu Józefa Sołtykowicza, jako przykład refleksji filozoficznej z kręgu Towarzystwa Naukowego Krakowskiego Krytyka Platona przyjmowania uczestniczenia (ei;dh) rzeczy w postaciach () jako przyczynek do dyskusji na temat źródeł antynomii w podstawach matematyki Wyjątkowy status człowieka w przyrodzie? Nauki ewolucyjne a chrześcijańska antropologia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1