Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence: Connecting Two Distinct Technologies to Comply with GDPR's Data Protection By Design Principle

Dániel Eszteri
{"title":"Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence: Connecting Two Distinct Technologies to Comply with GDPR's Data Protection By Design Principle","authors":"Dániel Eszteri","doi":"10.5817/mujlt2022-1-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the paper is to present some of the general principles of data protection law that can be applied to automated decision-making applications embedded into blockchain technology in order to comply with the provision of the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The analysis focuses on the applicability of the ‘data protection by design’ principle during the development of such systems. Because blockchain-based networks are built on distributed data processing operations, therefore data controlling or processing of participating nodes should comply some abstract data protection patterns predetermined and collectively built-in during the system’s development phase. On the other hand, the imprint of AI’s automated data processing could be also observed and tracked back in the blockchain due to its historically retroactive nature. In the end, the study presents the human mind and its ‘uploading’ with conscious and unconscious contents as an analogy to blockchain-based AI systems. My goal is to highlight that the synergy of blockchain and machine learning-based AI can be hypothetically suitable to develop robust yet transparent automated decision-making systems. The compliance of these distributed AI systems with data protection law’s principles is a key issue regarding the high risks posed by them to data subjects rights and freedoms.","PeriodicalId":38294,"journal":{"name":"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/mujlt2022-1-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to present some of the general principles of data protection law that can be applied to automated decision-making applications embedded into blockchain technology in order to comply with the provision of the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The analysis focuses on the applicability of the ‘data protection by design’ principle during the development of such systems. Because blockchain-based networks are built on distributed data processing operations, therefore data controlling or processing of participating nodes should comply some abstract data protection patterns predetermined and collectively built-in during the system’s development phase. On the other hand, the imprint of AI’s automated data processing could be also observed and tracked back in the blockchain due to its historically retroactive nature. In the end, the study presents the human mind and its ‘uploading’ with conscious and unconscious contents as an analogy to blockchain-based AI systems. My goal is to highlight that the synergy of blockchain and machine learning-based AI can be hypothetically suitable to develop robust yet transparent automated decision-making systems. The compliance of these distributed AI systems with data protection law’s principles is a key issue regarding the high risks posed by them to data subjects rights and freedoms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区块链和人工智能:连接两种不同的技术,以符合GDPR的数据保护设计原则
本文的目的是介绍数据保护法的一些一般原则,这些原则可以应用于嵌入区块链技术的自动化决策应用程序,以符合欧盟《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)的规定。分析的重点是“设计数据保护”原则在此类系统开发过程中的适用性。由于基于区块链的网络建立在分布式数据处理操作之上,因此参与节点的数据控制或处理应符合系统开发阶段预先确定并共同内置的一些抽象数据保护模式。另一方面,由于其历史追溯性,人工智能自动数据处理的印记也可以在区块链中观察和追溯。最后,该研究将人类的思维及其有意识和无意识内容的“上传”与基于区块链的人工智能系统进行了类比。我的目标是强调区块链和基于机器学习的人工智能的协同作用可以假设适用于开发强大而透明的自动化决策系统。这些分布式人工智能系统是否符合数据保护法的原则,是它们对数据主体权利和自由构成的高风险的一个关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Addressing Evolving Digital Piracy Through Contributory Liability for Copyright Infringement: The Mobdro Case Study (Un)lock and (Un)loaded: Regulating 3D-Printed Firearms in the Open-source Era after the 2013 Hysteria Patent-Eligible Invention Requirement Under the European Patent Convention and its Implications on Creations Involving Artificial Intelligence Cybersecurity: Notorious, but Often Misused and Confused Terms How the Two Child Abuse Cases Helped to Shape the Test of Originality of Photographic Works
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1