Usefulness of direct intratumoral administration of doxorubicin hydrochloride with an electro-osmosis–assisted pump

Ayu Ito, S. Itakura, Yuya Hasegawa, Miyu Hashimoto, Akie Okada, Mamoru Hirafuji, H. Nakamura, K. Sugibayashi, H. Todo
{"title":"Usefulness of direct intratumoral administration of doxorubicin hydrochloride with an electro-osmosis–assisted pump","authors":"Ayu Ito, S. Itakura, Yuya Hasegawa, Miyu Hashimoto, Akie Okada, Mamoru Hirafuji, H. Nakamura, K. Sugibayashi, H. Todo","doi":"10.3389/fddev.2023.1150894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients receiving chemotherapy by intravenous (i.v.) or oral administration of anticancer drugs often experience side effects. In this study, an electro-osmotic flow (EO) pump was used for the direct administration of an anticancer drug with minimum side effects. Doxorubicin hydrochloride (DXR) was used as an anticancer drug, and its antitumor effect and toxicity were evaluated in comparison with i.v. administration. Balb/c female mice were subcutaneously transplanted with a breast cancer cell line (4T1/Luc) stably expressing luciferase, and 20 μL of DXR solution (1.0 mg/mL) was administered intratumorally (i.t.) at a slow rate (0.6 µL/min) using an EO pump or rapidly using a syringe. For comparison, 100 μL of DXR solution was injected through the tail vein at the same dose and a 5-times higher dose. A tumor growth inhibitory effect without significant weight loss was observed with direct i.t. administration of DXR using an EO pump. On the other hand, no suppressive tumor growth effect was observed with i.v. administration of DXR at the same dose. Although there was no significant difference in the suppression effect on tumor growth between i.t. administration with EO pump and syringe, the peripheral skin concentration of DXR were decreased after slow administration with EO pump compared with that after rapidly administration with a syringe. These results indicated that direct i.t. administration of DXR with lower dosing using an EO pump at slower administration rate may be useful for exhibiting antitumor effects and suppressing systemic side effects. In addition, the blood concentration and the peripheral skin concentration of DXR after administration at lower rate with EO pump were decreased compared with those after the rapidly administration with a syringe.","PeriodicalId":73079,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in drug delivery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fddev.2023.1150894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Patients receiving chemotherapy by intravenous (i.v.) or oral administration of anticancer drugs often experience side effects. In this study, an electro-osmotic flow (EO) pump was used for the direct administration of an anticancer drug with minimum side effects. Doxorubicin hydrochloride (DXR) was used as an anticancer drug, and its antitumor effect and toxicity were evaluated in comparison with i.v. administration. Balb/c female mice were subcutaneously transplanted with a breast cancer cell line (4T1/Luc) stably expressing luciferase, and 20 μL of DXR solution (1.0 mg/mL) was administered intratumorally (i.t.) at a slow rate (0.6 µL/min) using an EO pump or rapidly using a syringe. For comparison, 100 μL of DXR solution was injected through the tail vein at the same dose and a 5-times higher dose. A tumor growth inhibitory effect without significant weight loss was observed with direct i.t. administration of DXR using an EO pump. On the other hand, no suppressive tumor growth effect was observed with i.v. administration of DXR at the same dose. Although there was no significant difference in the suppression effect on tumor growth between i.t. administration with EO pump and syringe, the peripheral skin concentration of DXR were decreased after slow administration with EO pump compared with that after rapidly administration with a syringe. These results indicated that direct i.t. administration of DXR with lower dosing using an EO pump at slower administration rate may be useful for exhibiting antitumor effects and suppressing systemic side effects. In addition, the blood concentration and the peripheral skin concentration of DXR after administration at lower rate with EO pump were decreased compared with those after the rapidly administration with a syringe.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电渗辅助泵直接瘤内给药盐酸阿霉素的有用性
通过静脉注射(i.v.)或口服抗癌药物接受化疗的患者经常会出现副作用。在本研究中,电渗流(EO)泵用于直接给药副作用最小的抗癌药物。使用盐酸阿霉素(DXR)作为抗癌药物,并与静脉给药进行比较,评价其抗肿瘤作用和毒性。Balb/c雌性小鼠皮下移植稳定表达荧光素酶的癌症细胞系(4T1/Luc),并使用EO泵或使用注射器以慢速(0.6µL/min)在肿瘤内(i.t.)施用20μL DXR溶液(1.0 mg/mL)。相比之下,100μL DXR溶液以相同剂量和5倍高的剂量通过尾静脉注射。使用EO泵直接i.t.给药DXR观察到肿瘤生长抑制作用而没有显著的体重减轻。另一方面,相同剂量的DXR静脉给药未观察到抑制肿瘤生长的作用。尽管EO泵和注射器静脉给药对肿瘤生长的抑制作用没有显著差异,但与注射器快速给药相比,EO泵缓慢给药后DXR的外周皮肤浓度降低。这些结果表明,使用EO泵以较慢的给药速率以较低剂量直接i.t.给药DXR可能有助于表现出抗肿瘤作用和抑制全身副作用。此外,与用注射器快速给药后相比,用EO泵以较低速率给药后的DXR的血液浓度和外周皮肤浓度降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategies and delivery systems for cell-based therapy in autoimmunity Preliminary results on novel adjuvant combinations suggest enhanced immunogenicity of whole inactivated pandemic influenza vaccines Induction of P-glycoprotein overexpression in brain endothelial cells as a model to study blood-brain barrier efflux transport SpheroMold: modernizing the hanging drop method for spheroid culture 3D-printed weight holders design and testing in mouse models of spinal cord injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1