The Spacialization Revisited: Extensive Type’s Characterization and Contradictions in Theodor W. Adorno

João Paulo Andrade
{"title":"The Spacialization Revisited: Extensive Type’s Characterization and Contradictions in Theodor W. Adorno","authors":"João Paulo Andrade","doi":"10.17533/udea.ef.352183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As Adorno’s posthumous writings were released, a notable turn in his philosophy of music became noteworthy: by revealing an ambitious project on Beethoven, a quasi-axiomatic theory of musical time emerged, which seems to guide adornian thought at very significant works and texts, as Philosophy of New Music. Sketched in three configuration types of musical time, this theory surprises with the so-called “extensive type”. Adorno would then admit kinds of formal consistency (Stimmigkeit) that are not restricted to the ideal of development (Entwicklung) and assumes the possibility of a non-regressive spatialization, which contrasts with his own ontological definition of the medium. This paper discusses the contradictions of extensive type by presenting an analysis of the Archduke Trio op. 97, in the light of the well-known originary affinity between Beethoven and Hegel. At last, the text presents by which means and for what reasons the extensive type would lead Adorno to the last and most decisive modality of musical time’s configuration, the late style.","PeriodicalId":32344,"journal":{"name":"Estudios de Filosofia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.352183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As Adorno’s posthumous writings were released, a notable turn in his philosophy of music became noteworthy: by revealing an ambitious project on Beethoven, a quasi-axiomatic theory of musical time emerged, which seems to guide adornian thought at very significant works and texts, as Philosophy of New Music. Sketched in three configuration types of musical time, this theory surprises with the so-called “extensive type”. Adorno would then admit kinds of formal consistency (Stimmigkeit) that are not restricted to the ideal of development (Entwicklung) and assumes the possibility of a non-regressive spatialization, which contrasts with his own ontological definition of the medium. This paper discusses the contradictions of extensive type by presenting an analysis of the Archduke Trio op. 97, in the light of the well-known originary affinity between Beethoven and Hegel. At last, the text presents by which means and for what reasons the extensive type would lead Adorno to the last and most decisive modality of musical time’s configuration, the late style.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视空间化:西奥多·W·阿多诺的广泛型特征与矛盾
随着阿多诺的遗作出版,他的音乐哲学发生了显著的转变:通过揭示一个关于贝多芬的雄心勃勃的项目,出现了一个音乐时间的准公理化理论,它似乎指导了阿多诺在非常重要的作品和文本中的思想,如《新音乐哲学》。这一理论在音乐时间的三种配置类型中被勾勒出来,并以所谓的“广泛型”而令人惊讶。然后,阿多诺会承认各种形式上的一致性(Stimmigkeit),这些一致性并不局限于发展的理想(Entwicklung),并假设了非回归空间化的可能性,这与他自己对媒介的本体论定义形成了对比。本文通过对《大公三重奏》op.97的分析,从贝多芬与黑格尔之间众所周知的渊源关系入手,探讨了广泛型的矛盾。最后,本文介绍了这种广泛的类型是通过什么方式以及出于什么原因导致阿多诺走向音乐时间形态的最后一种也是最具决定性的形态——晚期风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Las ilusiones de la multitud” o “imaginarios” y sus efectos el ámbito político, en la filosofía de Baruch Spinoza Benjaminian Reminiscences in Deleuze’s and Daney’s Dialogue about Images in Control Societies Acerca del conocimiento, uso y vivencia de la historia El arte y el artista modernos en Hegel La violencia en Cahiers pour une morale de Jean-Paul Sartre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1