Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with rheumatic aortic stenosis

T. Okuno, Daijiro Tomii, E. Buffle, J. Lanz, C. Ryffel, Caglayan Demirel, Suliman Hashemi, D. Hagemeyer, A. Papadis, D. Heg, F. Praz, S. Stortecky, S. Windecker, T. Pilgrim
{"title":"Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with rheumatic aortic stenosis","authors":"T. Okuno, Daijiro Tomii, E. Buffle, J. Lanz, C. Ryffel, Caglayan Demirel, Suliman Hashemi, D. Hagemeyer, A. Papadis, D. Heg, F. Praz, S. Stortecky, S. Windecker, T. Pilgrim","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) accounts for the highest number of deaths from valvular heart disease globally. Yet, rheumatic aortic stenosis (AS) was excluded from landmark studies investigating the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aimed to describe the clinical and anatomical characteristics of patients with rheumatic AS undergoing TAVI, and to compare procedural and clinical outcomes with patients undergoing TAVI for degenerative AS. Methods In a prospective TAVI registry, patients with rheumatic AS were identified based on International Classification of Diseases version 10 codes and/or a documented history of acute rheumatic fever and/or the World Heart Federation criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of RHD, and were propensity score-matched in a 1:4 ratio to patients with degenerative AS. Results Among 2329 patients undergoing TAVI, 105 (4.5%) had rheumatic AS. Compared with patients with degenerative AS, patients with rheumatic AS were more commonly female, older, had higher surgical risk and more commonly suffered from multivalvular heart disease. In the unmatched cohort, both technical success (85.7% vs 85.9%, p=0.887) and 1-year cardiovascular mortality (10.0% vs 8.6%; HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.18, p=0.656) were comparable between patients with rheumatic and degenerative AS. In contrast, patients with rheumatic AS had lower rates of 30-day and 1-year cardiovascular mortality compared with matched patients with degenerative AS (1.9% vs 8.9%, adjusted HR (HRadj) 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.80, p=0.024; and 10.0% vs 20.3%, HRadj 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.84, p=0.012, respectively). Conclusion TAVI may be a safe and effective treatment strategy for selected elderly patients with rheumatic AS. Trial registration number NCT01368250.","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"1225 - 1233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) accounts for the highest number of deaths from valvular heart disease globally. Yet, rheumatic aortic stenosis (AS) was excluded from landmark studies investigating the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aimed to describe the clinical and anatomical characteristics of patients with rheumatic AS undergoing TAVI, and to compare procedural and clinical outcomes with patients undergoing TAVI for degenerative AS. Methods In a prospective TAVI registry, patients with rheumatic AS were identified based on International Classification of Diseases version 10 codes and/or a documented history of acute rheumatic fever and/or the World Heart Federation criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of RHD, and were propensity score-matched in a 1:4 ratio to patients with degenerative AS. Results Among 2329 patients undergoing TAVI, 105 (4.5%) had rheumatic AS. Compared with patients with degenerative AS, patients with rheumatic AS were more commonly female, older, had higher surgical risk and more commonly suffered from multivalvular heart disease. In the unmatched cohort, both technical success (85.7% vs 85.9%, p=0.887) and 1-year cardiovascular mortality (10.0% vs 8.6%; HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.18, p=0.656) were comparable between patients with rheumatic and degenerative AS. In contrast, patients with rheumatic AS had lower rates of 30-day and 1-year cardiovascular mortality compared with matched patients with degenerative AS (1.9% vs 8.9%, adjusted HR (HRadj) 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.80, p=0.024; and 10.0% vs 20.3%, HRadj 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.84, p=0.012, respectively). Conclusion TAVI may be a safe and effective treatment strategy for selected elderly patients with rheumatic AS. Trial registration number NCT01368250.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风湿性主动脉瓣狭窄患者的经导管主动脉瓣植入术
背景风湿性心脏病(RHD)是全球瓣膜性心脏病死亡人数最多的疾病。然而,风湿性主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)被排除在研究经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)安全性和有效性的里程碑式研究之外。我们旨在描述接受TAVI的风湿性AS患者的临床和解剖特征,并将手术和临床结果与接受变性AS TAVI的患者进行比较,根据国际疾病分类第10版代码和/或有记录的急性风湿热病史和/或世界心脏联合会超声心动图诊断RHD的标准,确定风湿性AS患者,并且倾向评分与退行性AS患者的比例为1:4。结果在2329名接受TAVI的患者中,105例(4.5%)患有风湿性AS。与退行性AS患者相比,风湿性AS患者更常见于女性,年龄较大,手术风险较高,更常见于多瓣膜性心脏病。在不匹配的队列中,风湿性和退行性AS患者的技术成功率(85.7%vs 85.9%,p=0.887)和1年心血管死亡率(10.0%vs 8.6%;HR 1.16,95%CI 0.61-2.18,p=0.656)具有可比性。相反,与退行性AS患者相比,风湿性AS患者的30天和1年心血管死亡率较低(1.9%对8.9%,校正HR(HRadj)0.18,95%CI 0.04至0.80,p=0.024;和10.0%vs 20.3%,HRadj 0.44,95%CI 0.24-0.84,p=0.012)。结论TAVI可能是一种安全有效的治疗老年风湿性AS患者的策略。试验注册号NCT01368250。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A retrospective review of empiric acyclovir prescribing practices for suspected viral central nervous system infections: A single-centre study. Cortical Morphology in Cannabis Use Disorder: Implications for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment. Socioeconomic status and entrepreneurial networking responses to the COVID-19 crisis. Cardiac microstructural alterations measured by echocardiography identify sex-specific risk for heart failure. Aspirin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1