A. Rajaei, Khatereh Mohammadi, Mahbobeh Oroei, F. Farsad
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of Trabecular Bone Score in Osteoporosis","authors":"A. Rajaei, Khatereh Mohammadi, Mahbobeh Oroei, F. Farsad","doi":"10.5812/iranjradiol-131845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Osteoporosis is a common chronic disease that can cause fractures and other complications. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment of this disease can reduce the risk of fracture. The trabecular bone score (TBS) is a valuable tool for evaluating bone microarchitecture in patients with osteoporosis. Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the association of TBS score with bone mineral density (BMD) as the gold standard in patients with osteoporosis. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 254 patients admitted to Resalat Hospital in Tehran, Iran. The BMD and TBS were concurrently evaluated, and TBS validity for osteoporosis diagnosis was assessed based on BMD as the gold standard. The agreement between TBS and BMD results was measured using the kappa statistic. All analyses were performed in MedCalc version 18.11.3.8 and SPSS version 18, and the level of statistical significance was set at < 0.05. Results: In this study, the majority of the patients were female (88.2%) and younger than 65 years (63.0%). Osteopenia and osteoporosis were diagnosed in 42.1% and 18.9% of the patients, respectively. The sensitivity of TBS for diagnosing osteoporosis versus osteopenia and osteopenia versus a normal status was higher in patients aged ≥ 65 years compared to those aged < 65 years (63.33% vs. 27.78% and 86.66% vs. 63.63%, respectively). Overall, TBS demonstrated a high diagnostic ability for differentiating osteoporosis versus normal BMD (AUC = 0.911, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Based on the findings, TBS alone is not sufficient for diagnosing osteoporosis and cannot replace BMD. Therefore, a combination of BMD and TBS techniques can be the best approach for diagnosing osteoporosis, especially in patients aged ≥ 65 years.","PeriodicalId":50273,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-131845","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Osteoporosis is a common chronic disease that can cause fractures and other complications. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment of this disease can reduce the risk of fracture. The trabecular bone score (TBS) is a valuable tool for evaluating bone microarchitecture in patients with osteoporosis. Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the association of TBS score with bone mineral density (BMD) as the gold standard in patients with osteoporosis. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 254 patients admitted to Resalat Hospital in Tehran, Iran. The BMD and TBS were concurrently evaluated, and TBS validity for osteoporosis diagnosis was assessed based on BMD as the gold standard. The agreement between TBS and BMD results was measured using the kappa statistic. All analyses were performed in MedCalc version 18.11.3.8 and SPSS version 18, and the level of statistical significance was set at < 0.05. Results: In this study, the majority of the patients were female (88.2%) and younger than 65 years (63.0%). Osteopenia and osteoporosis were diagnosed in 42.1% and 18.9% of the patients, respectively. The sensitivity of TBS for diagnosing osteoporosis versus osteopenia and osteopenia versus a normal status was higher in patients aged ≥ 65 years compared to those aged < 65 years (63.33% vs. 27.78% and 86.66% vs. 63.63%, respectively). Overall, TBS demonstrated a high diagnostic ability for differentiating osteoporosis versus normal BMD (AUC = 0.911, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Based on the findings, TBS alone is not sufficient for diagnosing osteoporosis and cannot replace BMD. Therefore, a combination of BMD and TBS techniques can be the best approach for diagnosing osteoporosis, especially in patients aged ≥ 65 years.
期刊介绍:
The Iranian Journal of Radiology is the official journal of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and the Iranian Society of Radiology. It is a scientific forum dedicated primarily to the topics relevant to radiology and allied sciences of the developing countries, which have been neglected or have received little attention in the Western medical literature.
This journal particularly welcomes manuscripts which deal with radiology and imaging from geographic regions wherein problems regarding economic, social, ethnic and cultural parameters affecting prevalence and course of the illness are taken into consideration.
The Iranian Journal of Radiology has been launched in order to interchange information in the field of radiology and other related scientific spheres. In accordance with the objective of developing the scientific ability of the radiological population and other related scientific fields, this journal publishes research articles, evidence-based review articles, and case reports focused on regional tropics.
Iranian Journal of Radiology operates in agreement with the below principles in compliance with continuous quality improvement:
1-Increasing the satisfaction of the readers, authors, staff, and co-workers.
2-Improving the scientific content and appearance of the journal.
3-Advancing the scientific validity of the journal both nationally and internationally.
Such basics are accomplished only by aggregative effort and reciprocity of the radiological population and related sciences, authorities, and staff of the journal.