Introduction to special section on Legislation and Diversity

Felix Uhlmann, Mauro Zamboni, Ronan Cormacain
{"title":"Introduction to special section on Legislation and Diversity","authors":"Felix Uhlmann, Mauro Zamboni, Ronan Cormacain","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2021.1909368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legislation pursues objectives. Most laws are aimed at eliminating social problems or improving living conditions. The task of legislative theory is to process the functions of law-making and to provide practical means to make laws effective and proportionate. Diversity is one of the most controversial and demanding objectives of the recent past. The content goes beyond mere equality issues, but is of course committed to them. It encompasses the conscious handling of diversity in society, not only as a matter of fairness but also in recognising the diverse achievements and experiences of people and understanding them as potential. The central question posed by this special issue is – what is the role of regulation in promoting, protecting or advancing diversity? We proceed on the assumption that diversity is a good thing and then consider the function of regulation in effecting societal change to achieve this aim. Is this an area which is appropriate for regulation, or is it an area where society or the market will inevitably reach the end result in the absence of state intervention, making regulation superfluous or fruitless? If we do have state intervention in the form of regulation, what type or types of regulation are appropriate or most likely to achieve that end goal? Diversity literally comes in many shapes and sizes. In this special issue we analyse just some types of diversity: gender diversity (in the context of male and female), religious and political diversity and racial diversity. But even this attempt to consider diversity is not itself diverse, as we don’t consider diversity in terms of trans-identities, or diversity of those with a disability, or diversity in terms of sexual orientation. Even the very language of legislation itself can be a tool to promote or restrict diversity. The world-wide attention now being given to racial justice, triggered by the Black Lives Matter movement, highlights the importance of anti-discrimination laws and legal protections for diversity.","PeriodicalId":42455,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20508840.2021.1909368","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2021.1909368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Legislation pursues objectives. Most laws are aimed at eliminating social problems or improving living conditions. The task of legislative theory is to process the functions of law-making and to provide practical means to make laws effective and proportionate. Diversity is one of the most controversial and demanding objectives of the recent past. The content goes beyond mere equality issues, but is of course committed to them. It encompasses the conscious handling of diversity in society, not only as a matter of fairness but also in recognising the diverse achievements and experiences of people and understanding them as potential. The central question posed by this special issue is – what is the role of regulation in promoting, protecting or advancing diversity? We proceed on the assumption that diversity is a good thing and then consider the function of regulation in effecting societal change to achieve this aim. Is this an area which is appropriate for regulation, or is it an area where society or the market will inevitably reach the end result in the absence of state intervention, making regulation superfluous or fruitless? If we do have state intervention in the form of regulation, what type or types of regulation are appropriate or most likely to achieve that end goal? Diversity literally comes in many shapes and sizes. In this special issue we analyse just some types of diversity: gender diversity (in the context of male and female), religious and political diversity and racial diversity. But even this attempt to consider diversity is not itself diverse, as we don’t consider diversity in terms of trans-identities, or diversity of those with a disability, or diversity in terms of sexual orientation. Even the very language of legislation itself can be a tool to promote or restrict diversity. The world-wide attention now being given to racial justice, triggered by the Black Lives Matter movement, highlights the importance of anti-discrimination laws and legal protections for diversity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立法和多样性特别章节介绍
立法追求目标。大多数法律旨在消除社会问题或改善生活条件。立法理论的任务是处理立法的功能,并提供使法律有效和适度的实用手段。多样性是近年来最具争议和要求最高的目标之一。内容不仅仅是平等问题,当然也致力于这些问题。它包括有意识地处理社会的多样性,不仅是公平的问题,而且是承认人们的不同成就和经历,并将其理解为潜力。这个特殊问题提出的核心问题是——监管在促进、保护或促进多样性方面的作用是什么?我们假设多样性是一件好事,然后考虑监管在实现这一目标的社会变革中的作用。这是一个适合监管的领域,还是一个在没有国家干预的情况下,社会或市场将不可避免地达到最终结果,使监管变得多余或徒劳的领域?如果我们确实以监管的形式进行国家干预,那么什么类型的监管是合适的或最有可能实现这一最终目标?多样性实际上有多种形状和大小。在这期特刊中,我们只分析了一些类型的多样性:性别多样性(在男性和女性的背景下)、宗教和政治多样性以及种族多样性。但即使是这种考虑多样性的尝试本身也不是多样性的,因为我们没有从跨性别身份、残疾人的多样性或性取向的多样性方面考虑多样性。即使是立法本身的语言也可以成为促进或限制多样性的工具。“黑人的命也是命”运动引发了全世界对种族正义的关注,凸显了反歧视法和对多样性的法律保护的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Theory and Practice of Legislation aims to offer an international and interdisciplinary forum for the examination of legislation. The focus of the journal, which succeeds the former title Legisprudence, remains with legislation in its broadest sense. Legislation is seen as both process and product, reflection of theoretical assumptions and a skill. The journal addresses formal legislation, and its alternatives (such as covenants, regulation by non-state actors etc.). The editors welcome articles on systematic (as opposed to historical) issues, including drafting techniques, the introduction of open standards, evidence-based drafting, pre- and post-legislative scrutiny for effectiveness and efficiency, the utility and necessity of codification, IT in legislation, the legitimacy of legislation in view of fundamental principles and rights, law and language, and the link between legislator and judge. Comparative and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. But dogmatic descriptions of positive law are outside the scope of the journal. The journal offers a combination of themed issues and general issues. All articles are submitted to double blind review.
期刊最新文献
Regulatory capture in energy sector: evidence from Indonesia Operationalisation of legislation and the will of legislators in the judgments of international courts of war crimes and post-war recovery Observing law-making patterns in times of crisis Exploring the relationship between law and governance: a proposal Governing during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1