EXpert consensus On Diaphragm UltraSonography in the critically ill (EXODUS): a Delphi consensus statement on the measurement of diaphragm ultrasound-derived parameters in a critical care setting.

Mark E Haaksma, Jasper M Smit, Alain Boussuges, Alexandre Demoule, Martin Dres, Giovanni Ferrari, Paolo Formenti, Ewan C Goligher, Leo Heunks, Endry H T Lim, Lidwine B Mokkink, Eleni Soilemezi, Zhonghua Shi, Michele Umbrello, Luigi Vetrugno, Emmanuel Vivier, Lei Xu, Massimo Zambon, Pieter R Tuinman
{"title":"EXpert consensus On Diaphragm UltraSonography in the critically ill (EXODUS): a Delphi consensus statement on the measurement of diaphragm ultrasound-derived parameters in a critical care setting.","authors":"Mark E Haaksma, Jasper M Smit, Alain Boussuges, Alexandre Demoule, Martin Dres, Giovanni Ferrari, Paolo Formenti, Ewan C Goligher, Leo Heunks, Endry H T Lim, Lidwine B Mokkink, Eleni Soilemezi, Zhonghua Shi, Michele Umbrello, Luigi Vetrugno, Emmanuel Vivier, Lei Xu, Massimo Zambon, Pieter R Tuinman","doi":"10.1186/s13054-022-03975-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diaphragm ultrasonography is rapidly evolving in both critical care and research. Nevertheless, methodologically robust guidelines on its methodology and acquiring expertise do not, or only partially, exist. Therefore, we set out to provide consensus-based statements towards a universal measurement protocol for diaphragm ultrasonography and establish key areas for research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To formulate a robust expert consensus statement, between November 2020 and May 2021, a two-round, anonymous and online survey-based Delphi study among experts in the field was performed. Based on the literature review, the following domains were chosen: \"Anatomy and physiology\", \"Transducer Settings\", \"Ventilator Impact\", \"Learning and expertise\", \"Daily practice\" and \"Future directions\". Agreement of ≥ 68% (≥ 10 panelists) was needed to reach consensus on a question.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 18 panelists invited, 14 agreed to participate in the survey. After two rounds, the survey included 117 questions of which 42 questions were designed to collect arguments and opinions and 75 questions aimed at reaching consensus. Of these, 46 (61%) consensus was reached. In both rounds, the response rate was 100%. Among others, there was agreement on measuring thickness between the pleura and peritoneum, using > 10% decrease in thickness as cut-off for atrophy and using 40 examinations as minimum training to use diaphragm ultrasonography in clinical practice. In addition, key areas for research were established.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This expert consensus statement presents the first set of consensus-based statements on diaphragm ultrasonography methodology. They serve to ensure high-quality and homogenous measurements in daily clinical practice and in research. In addition, important gaps in current knowledge and thereby key areas for research are established. Trial registration The study was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework with registration digital object identifier https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HM8UG .</p>","PeriodicalId":92888,"journal":{"name":"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":"99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03975-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diaphragm ultrasonography is rapidly evolving in both critical care and research. Nevertheless, methodologically robust guidelines on its methodology and acquiring expertise do not, or only partially, exist. Therefore, we set out to provide consensus-based statements towards a universal measurement protocol for diaphragm ultrasonography and establish key areas for research.

Methods: To formulate a robust expert consensus statement, between November 2020 and May 2021, a two-round, anonymous and online survey-based Delphi study among experts in the field was performed. Based on the literature review, the following domains were chosen: "Anatomy and physiology", "Transducer Settings", "Ventilator Impact", "Learning and expertise", "Daily practice" and "Future directions". Agreement of ≥ 68% (≥ 10 panelists) was needed to reach consensus on a question.

Results: Of 18 panelists invited, 14 agreed to participate in the survey. After two rounds, the survey included 117 questions of which 42 questions were designed to collect arguments and opinions and 75 questions aimed at reaching consensus. Of these, 46 (61%) consensus was reached. In both rounds, the response rate was 100%. Among others, there was agreement on measuring thickness between the pleura and peritoneum, using > 10% decrease in thickness as cut-off for atrophy and using 40 examinations as minimum training to use diaphragm ultrasonography in clinical practice. In addition, key areas for research were established.

Conclusion: This expert consensus statement presents the first set of consensus-based statements on diaphragm ultrasonography methodology. They serve to ensure high-quality and homogenous measurements in daily clinical practice and in research. In addition, important gaps in current knowledge and thereby key areas for research are established. Trial registration The study was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework with registration digital object identifier https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HM8UG .

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危重症患者膈肌超声造影的EXpert共识(EXODUS):在危重症护理环境中测量膈肌超声衍生参数的Delphi共识声明
背景:横膈膜超声在重症监护和研究方面都在迅速发展。然而,关于其方法和获取专门知识的方法学上可靠的指导方针并不存在,或只是部分存在。因此,我们着手为隔膜超声的通用测量方案提供基于共识的声明,并建立关键的研究领域。方法:为了形成一个强有力的专家共识声明,在2020年11月至2021年5月期间,对该领域的专家进行了两轮匿名在线调查的德尔菲研究。根据文献综述,选择了以下领域:“解剖学和生理学”,“换能器设置”,“呼吸机影响”,“学习和专业知识”,“日常实践”和“未来方向”。需要≥68%(≥10名小组成员)的同意才能就一个问题达成共识。结果:在被邀请的18位小组成员中,有14位同意参与调查。经过两轮调查,共有117个问题,其中42个问题旨在收集论点和意见,75个问题旨在达成共识。其中,达成共识的有46个(61%)。在这两轮调查中,回复率均为100%。其中,测量胸膜和腹膜之间的厚度,以bbb10 - 10%的厚度下降作为萎缩的截止值,并以40次检查作为临床实践中使用隔膜超声的最低训练。此外,还确定了重点研究领域。结论:该专家共识声明提出了第一套基于共识的隔膜超声检查方法声明。它们有助于确保在日常临床实践和研究中进行高质量和均匀的测量。此外,现有知识的重要差距,从而建立了关键的研究领域。试验注册本研究在开放科学框架上预注册,注册数字对象标识符https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HM8UG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virtual and augmented reality in critical care medicine: the patient’s, clinician’s, and researcher’s perspective Wearable ultrasound and provocative hemodynamics: a view of the future Comparison of continuous versus intermittent enteral feeding in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chest dual-energy CT to assess the effects of steroids on lung function in severe COVID-19 patients ANALYTICAL SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION FOR A CLASS OF STOICHIOMETRY MATRICES.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1