Theology, history, and the modern German university

D. Inman
{"title":"Theology, history, and the modern German university","authors":"D. Inman","doi":"10.1080/1474225x.2022.2026613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Successive genealogists of theology have long explored the significance of the University of Berlin’s foundation in 1809/10 and, in particular, the instrumental voice of Friedrich Schleiermacher in reconfiguring theology as a modern university discipline. In recent years, a handful of important monographs have further elucidated the meaning of Wissenschaft (unsatisfactorily translated as ‘science’ in English and defining, broadly speaking, a common ethos/standard of intellectual endeavour across academic disciplines) as well as the ‘historical turn’ in German and Englishspeaking theology – notably by Johannes Zachhuber, Zachary Purvis and Joshua Bennett. Vander Schel and DeJonge offer this insightful and complementary volume – the first in Mohr Siebeck’s new Christentum in der modernen Welt series – that features a series of essays giving both cogent overviews of the philosophical and methodological dynamics of this crucial context for modern theology’s development and relationship to the research university. Much of the material within offers lucid surveys: Jacqueline Mariña’s essay on ‘Kant, Schleiermacher, and the Study of Theology’ and Christophe Chalamet’s contribution on Karl Barth would be very helpful reading for any graduate student trying to understand the task of theology since the Enlightenment, for example. Other contributions offer more focussed accounts of individual theologians and church historians that elucidate the whole and offer teasing pathways for future conversations, on occasion with rich personal and contextual detail. See, for example, Zachary Purvis’s illuminating reassessment of the charmingly donnish August Neander, whose extraordinary output and influence came to define religious historicism within Germany and beyond (see also Joshua Bennett’s recent article on Neander in the Historical Journal in this respect). Articles on Baur (Peter Hodgson), Ritschl and Eduard Zeller (Zachhuber), as well as the Roman Catholics J.S. Drey and J. Kuhn (Grant Kaplan) and, at the other end of the century, Harnack (Jonathan Teubner) and Troeltsch (Christian Polke), offer fresh and up-to-date readings in the greats of nineteenth-century German theologian, from Tübingen as much as Berlin. These are complemented by several articles on German historicism abroad with an overview of Newman’s influential redefinition of the university by Matthew Muller and Kenneth Parker, the German impact on British theology (via the Cambridge theologians Connop Thirlwall and Julius Hare, in particular) by Mark Chapman, and the role of Henry Boynton Smith in the United States as a ‘transatlantic bridge-builder’ by Annette G. Aubert. These perhaps sit less convincingly within the volume; the influence of German historical theology in its changing forms on English-speaking theology arguably extends beyond the remit of the title and seems somewhat confined to the mid-nineteenth century, thus losing something of the international dynamism of Protestant historical theology at the turn of the twentieth. There might also have been a helpful article or introduction on the development of the German university more generally, although most articles are helpfully attentive to the changing political contexts of what were state institutions.","PeriodicalId":42198,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church","volume":"21 1","pages":"307 - 308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1474225x.2022.2026613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Successive genealogists of theology have long explored the significance of the University of Berlin’s foundation in 1809/10 and, in particular, the instrumental voice of Friedrich Schleiermacher in reconfiguring theology as a modern university discipline. In recent years, a handful of important monographs have further elucidated the meaning of Wissenschaft (unsatisfactorily translated as ‘science’ in English and defining, broadly speaking, a common ethos/standard of intellectual endeavour across academic disciplines) as well as the ‘historical turn’ in German and Englishspeaking theology – notably by Johannes Zachhuber, Zachary Purvis and Joshua Bennett. Vander Schel and DeJonge offer this insightful and complementary volume – the first in Mohr Siebeck’s new Christentum in der modernen Welt series – that features a series of essays giving both cogent overviews of the philosophical and methodological dynamics of this crucial context for modern theology’s development and relationship to the research university. Much of the material within offers lucid surveys: Jacqueline Mariña’s essay on ‘Kant, Schleiermacher, and the Study of Theology’ and Christophe Chalamet’s contribution on Karl Barth would be very helpful reading for any graduate student trying to understand the task of theology since the Enlightenment, for example. Other contributions offer more focussed accounts of individual theologians and church historians that elucidate the whole and offer teasing pathways for future conversations, on occasion with rich personal and contextual detail. See, for example, Zachary Purvis’s illuminating reassessment of the charmingly donnish August Neander, whose extraordinary output and influence came to define religious historicism within Germany and beyond (see also Joshua Bennett’s recent article on Neander in the Historical Journal in this respect). Articles on Baur (Peter Hodgson), Ritschl and Eduard Zeller (Zachhuber), as well as the Roman Catholics J.S. Drey and J. Kuhn (Grant Kaplan) and, at the other end of the century, Harnack (Jonathan Teubner) and Troeltsch (Christian Polke), offer fresh and up-to-date readings in the greats of nineteenth-century German theologian, from Tübingen as much as Berlin. These are complemented by several articles on German historicism abroad with an overview of Newman’s influential redefinition of the university by Matthew Muller and Kenneth Parker, the German impact on British theology (via the Cambridge theologians Connop Thirlwall and Julius Hare, in particular) by Mark Chapman, and the role of Henry Boynton Smith in the United States as a ‘transatlantic bridge-builder’ by Annette G. Aubert. These perhaps sit less convincingly within the volume; the influence of German historical theology in its changing forms on English-speaking theology arguably extends beyond the remit of the title and seems somewhat confined to the mid-nineteenth century, thus losing something of the international dynamism of Protestant historical theology at the turn of the twentieth. There might also have been a helpful article or introduction on the development of the German university more generally, although most articles are helpfully attentive to the changing political contexts of what were state institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神学、历史与现代德国大学
历届神学谱系学家长期以来一直在探索柏林大学1809/10年成立的意义,尤其是弗里德里希·施莱尔马赫在将神学重新配置为现代大学学科方面的工具性声音。近年来,一些重要的专著进一步阐明了Wissenschaft(英语中不令人满意地翻译为“科学”,广义上定义了跨学科的共同精神/智力努力标准)的含义,以及德语和英语神学的“历史转折”——尤其是Johannes Zachuber,Zachary Purvis和Joshua Bennett。范德谢尔(Vander Schel)和德容格(DeJonge)提供了这本富有洞察力和互补性的书,这是莫尔·西贝克(Mohr Siebeck)的《现代世界的基督》(Christentum in der modern Welt)系列中的第一本,其中有一系列文章,对现代神学的发展以及与研究型大学的关系的这一关键背景下的哲学和方法论动态进行了令人信服的概述。其中的许多材料都提供了清晰的调查:例如,杰奎琳·马里尼亚关于“康德、施莱尔马赫和神学研究”的文章,以及克里斯托弗·查拉梅对卡尔·巴特的贡献,对于任何试图理解启蒙运动以来神学任务的研究生来说,都是非常有帮助的。其他贡献提供了对个别神学家和教会历史学家的更集中的描述,阐明了整体,并为未来的对话提供了调侃的途径,有时还提供了丰富的个人和背景细节。例如,请参阅Zachary Purvis对迷人的多愁善感的August Neander的启发性重新评估,他的非凡产出和影响力定义了德国内外的宗教历史主义(另请参阅Joshua Bennett最近在《历史杂志》上发表的关于Neander这方面的文章)。关于鲍尔(彼得·霍奇森饰)、里施尔和爱德华·泽勒(扎胡贝尔饰),以及罗马天主教徒J·S·德雷和J·库恩(格兰特·卡普兰饰),本世纪另一端的哈纳克(乔纳森·特乌布纳饰)和特洛尔奇(克里斯蒂安·波尔克饰)的文章,为19世纪德国神学家的伟大人物提供了新鲜和最新的解读,从图宾根到柏林。这些补充了国外关于德国历史主义的几篇文章,其中概述了Matthew Muller和Kenneth Parker对纽曼对大学的有影响力的重新定义,Mark Chapman对德国对英国神学的影响(尤其是通过剑桥神学家Connop Thirlwall和Julius Hare),以及安妮特·G·奥伯特在美国扮演的“跨大西洋桥梁建设者”亨利·博因顿·史密斯的角色。这些可能不太令人信服地放在卷内;德国历史神学以其不断变化的形式对英语神学的影响可以说超出了标题的范围,似乎在某种程度上局限于19世纪中期,从而在20世纪之交失去了新教历史神学的国际活力。关于德国大学的发展,也可能有一篇有用的文章或介绍,尽管大多数文章都有益于关注国家机构不断变化的政治背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Nation, sacrifice and Protestant church in China The promised dawn The promised dawn , by Robert A. Gillies with David A. Stout, Haddington, Scotland, Handsel Press, 2023, 128 pp., £10.95 (paperback), ISBN 978-1-912052-82-0 ‘We are Scottish nationalist and Catholic’: Death’s Bright Shadow and Catholic literary nationalism Christian nationalism in post-apartheid South Africa: from the white broederbond to the transracial Neo/Pentecostals What does it mean to be a Christian nationalist in Meiji Japan?: Religion, nationalism and the state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1