What’s love got to do with it? How does workplace romance provoke workplace ostracism and interpersonal conflict

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION International Journal of Conflict Management Pub Date : 2023-06-06 DOI:10.1108/ijcma-09-2022-0148
Ye Feng, Asif Mehmood Rana, H. Bashir, M. Sarmad, Anmol Rasheed, Arslan Ayub
{"title":"What’s love got to do with it? How does workplace romance provoke workplace ostracism and interpersonal conflict","authors":"Ye Feng, Asif Mehmood Rana, H. Bashir, M. Sarmad, Anmol Rasheed, Arslan Ayub","doi":"10.1108/ijcma-09-2022-0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nExtant research on workplace ostracism has investigated a victimization perspective to understand ostracism at the cost of examining the perpetrator-centric view of ostracism. This study aims to draw on the self-categorization theory and the social exchange theory to investigate the harmful effects of workplace romance in cultivating workplace ostracism from the perspective of perpetrator to combat concerns for victim blaming. This study further proposes that workplace ostracism triggered by workplace romance provokes interpersonal conflict. Besides, this study investigates the moderating role of prosocial behavior in the underlying linkages.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study uses a multisource, time-lagged research design to collect data from employees working in the service sector organizations in Pakistan. This study analyzes 367 responses using SmartPLS (v 4.0).\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings of this study reveal that workplace romance elicits workplace ostracism, which, in turn, fosters interpersonal conflict among coworkers. In addition, this study finds that ingroup prosocial behavior strengthens the associations between workplace romance and workplace ostracism, and workplace romance and interpersonal conflict, mediated by workplace ostracism such that the associations are more potent at higher levels of ingroup prosocial behavior and vice versa.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that examines workplace romance as the perpetrator-centric antecedent of workplace ostracism, and ingroup prosocial behavior in exaggerating the outgroup ostracism and interpersonal conflict.\n","PeriodicalId":47382,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Conflict Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Conflict Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-09-2022-0148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Extant research on workplace ostracism has investigated a victimization perspective to understand ostracism at the cost of examining the perpetrator-centric view of ostracism. This study aims to draw on the self-categorization theory and the social exchange theory to investigate the harmful effects of workplace romance in cultivating workplace ostracism from the perspective of perpetrator to combat concerns for victim blaming. This study further proposes that workplace ostracism triggered by workplace romance provokes interpersonal conflict. Besides, this study investigates the moderating role of prosocial behavior in the underlying linkages. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a multisource, time-lagged research design to collect data from employees working in the service sector organizations in Pakistan. This study analyzes 367 responses using SmartPLS (v 4.0). Findings The findings of this study reveal that workplace romance elicits workplace ostracism, which, in turn, fosters interpersonal conflict among coworkers. In addition, this study finds that ingroup prosocial behavior strengthens the associations between workplace romance and workplace ostracism, and workplace romance and interpersonal conflict, mediated by workplace ostracism such that the associations are more potent at higher levels of ingroup prosocial behavior and vice versa. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that examines workplace romance as the perpetrator-centric antecedent of workplace ostracism, and ingroup prosocial behavior in exaggerating the outgroup ostracism and interpersonal conflict.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱和它有什么关系?职场恋情如何引发职场排斥和人际冲突
目的对工作场所排斥的外部研究以研究以行为人为中心的排斥观为代价,调查了一种受害视角来理解排斥。本研究旨在借鉴自我分类理论和社会交换理论,从行为人的角度探讨职场浪漫对培养职场排斥的有害影响,以对抗对受害者指责的担忧。本研究进一步提出,职场恋情引发的职场排斥会引发人际冲突。此外,本研究还调查了亲社会行为在潜在联系中的调节作用。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用多源、滞后的研究设计,从巴基斯坦服务业组织的员工那里收集数据。这项研究使用SmartPLS(4.0版)分析了367份回复。研究结果表明,职场恋情会引发职场排斥,进而加剧同事之间的人际冲突。此外,本研究发现,群体内亲社会行为加强了工作场所浪漫与工作场所排斥、工作场所浪漫和人际冲突之间的联系,这种联系是由工作场所排斥介导的,因此这种联系在较高水平的群体内亲社会行为中更为强烈,反之亦然。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一项研究,将职场浪漫作为职场排斥的以行为人为中心的前因,以及夸大群体外排斥和人际冲突的群体内亲社会行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Conflict management 101: how emotional intelligence can make or break a manager The relationship between management vs nonmanagement status and women employees’ dissent expression in US organizations Social strife at work: unravelling the link between workplace relationship conflict and employee ostracism behavior Does the conflict between work and family hinder thriving? Role of depersonalization and intrinsic motivation Workplace bullying and employee silence: the role of affect-based trust and climate for conflict management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1