Changes in Gaze Behavior during the Learning of the Epidural Technique with a Simulator in Anesthesia Novices

Pub Date : 2020-11-06 DOI:10.4236/ojanes.2020.1011032
Emanuele Capogna, Francesco Salvi, A. Vecchio, M. Velardo, G. Capogna
{"title":"Changes in Gaze Behavior during the Learning of the Epidural Technique with a Simulator in Anesthesia Novices","authors":"Emanuele Capogna, Francesco Salvi, A. Vecchio, M. Velardo, G. Capogna","doi":"10.4236/ojanes.2020.1011032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Current literature demonstrates the ability of eye tracking to provide reliable quantitative data as an objective assessment tool, with potential applications to medical and surgical training to improve performance. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in gaze behavior in anesthesia novice trainees when performing a simulated epidural technique before and after a hands-on training on the epidural simulator. Methods: We enrolled 48 novice trainees who had never previously performed an epidural block. After a standardized learning module, each trainee practiced the epidural procedure on the epidural simulator while wearing a pair of eye tracking glasses (Tobii Pro Glasses 50 Hz wearable wireless eye tracker). After this baseline recording, each trainee spent two hours practicing with the epidural simulator and afterwards once again performed the eye tracking epidural procedure. Eye tracking metrics and epidural learning (duration of the procedure and number of attempts) before and after the simulated practice were recorded. Results: The duration of the epidural procedure and of the epidural needle advancement phase (P 0.05) and the number of epidural attempts (P 0.001) were reduced after the tutorial. When considering the eye tracking metrics, after the tutorial, the number of visit counts decreased and their duration increased (P 0.05). The number of epidural needle insertions (additional attempts) showed a significant positive correlation with the visits number (aOR = 2.02 (95% CI = 1.26 - 3.55; P = 0.008)) and a significant negative correlation with the visit duration (aOR = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.39 - 0.99; P = 0.05)). Conclusion: We observed significant changes in gaze behavior associated with increased performance during the epidural technique learning with a simulator in anesthesia trainees who had never previously performed an epidural block. These results may create a prototype for future studies on eye tracking technique as a teaching and evaluating tool in simulation.","PeriodicalId":90667,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"10 1","pages":"361-370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2020.1011032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Current literature demonstrates the ability of eye tracking to provide reliable quantitative data as an objective assessment tool, with potential applications to medical and surgical training to improve performance. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in gaze behavior in anesthesia novice trainees when performing a simulated epidural technique before and after a hands-on training on the epidural simulator. Methods: We enrolled 48 novice trainees who had never previously performed an epidural block. After a standardized learning module, each trainee practiced the epidural procedure on the epidural simulator while wearing a pair of eye tracking glasses (Tobii Pro Glasses 50 Hz wearable wireless eye tracker). After this baseline recording, each trainee spent two hours practicing with the epidural simulator and afterwards once again performed the eye tracking epidural procedure. Eye tracking metrics and epidural learning (duration of the procedure and number of attempts) before and after the simulated practice were recorded. Results: The duration of the epidural procedure and of the epidural needle advancement phase (P 0.05) and the number of epidural attempts (P 0.001) were reduced after the tutorial. When considering the eye tracking metrics, after the tutorial, the number of visit counts decreased and their duration increased (P 0.05). The number of epidural needle insertions (additional attempts) showed a significant positive correlation with the visits number (aOR = 2.02 (95% CI = 1.26 - 3.55; P = 0.008)) and a significant negative correlation with the visit duration (aOR = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.39 - 0.99; P = 0.05)). Conclusion: We observed significant changes in gaze behavior associated with increased performance during the epidural technique learning with a simulator in anesthesia trainees who had never previously performed an epidural block. These results may create a prototype for future studies on eye tracking technique as a teaching and evaluating tool in simulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉新手在使用模拟器学习硬膜外技术过程中注视行为的变化
背景:目前的文献表明,眼动追踪作为一种客观的评估工具,能够提供可靠的定量数据,并有可能应用于医疗和外科训练,以提高表现。目的:本研究的目的是评估麻醉新手在硬膜外模拟器上进行模拟硬膜外技术操作训练前后凝视行为的变化。方法:我们招募了48名从未进行过硬膜外阻滞的新手学员。在标准化学习模块后,每位受训者在硬膜外模拟器上练习硬膜外手术,同时佩戴一副眼动追踪眼镜(Tobii Pro glasses 50 Hz可佩戴无线眼动仪)。在这一基线记录之后,每个受训者花了两个小时在硬膜外模拟器上练习,然后再次进行眼动追踪硬膜外手术。记录模拟练习前后的眼动追踪指标和硬膜外学习(手术持续时间和尝试次数)。结果:指导后,硬膜外手术和硬膜外针推进阶段的持续时间(P 0.05)和硬膜外尝试次数(P 0.001)减少。当在教程之后考虑眼睛跟踪度量时,硬膜外针插入次数(额外尝试次数)与访视次数呈显著正相关(aOR=2.02(95%CI=1.26-3.55;P=0.008)),与访视时间呈显著负相关(aOR=0.65(95%CI=0.39-0.99;P=0.005))在从未进行过硬膜外阻滞的麻醉受训者中,在使用模拟器学习硬膜外技术的过程中,凝视行为的显著变化与表现的提高有关。这些结果可能为未来研究眼动追踪技术作为模拟教学和评估工具创造一个原型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1