Guidance for Materials 4.0 to interact with a digital twin

IF 2.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DataCentric Engineering Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI:10.1017/dce.2022.23
D. Cogswell, Chaitanya Paramatmuni, Lucia Scotti, James Moffat
{"title":"Guidance for Materials 4.0 to interact with a digital twin","authors":"D. Cogswell, Chaitanya Paramatmuni, Lucia Scotti, James Moffat","doi":"10.1017/dce.2022.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The rapid development of new infrastructure programmes requires an accelerated deployment of new materials in new environments. Materials 4.0 is crucial to achieve these goals. The application of digital to the field of materials has been at the forefront of research for many years, but there does not exist a unified means to describe a framework for this area creating pockets of development. This is confounded by the broader expectations of a digital twin (DT) as the possible answer to all these problems. The issue being that there is no accepted definition of a component DT, and what information it should contain and how it can be implemented across the product lifecycle exist. Within this position paper, a clear distinction is made between the “manufacturing DT” and the “component DT”; the former being the starting boundary conditions of the latter. In order to achieve this, we also discuss the introduction of a digital thread as a key concept in passing data through manufacturing and into service. The stages of how to define a framework around the development of DTs from a materials perspective is given, which acknowledges the difference between creating new understanding within academia and the application of this knowledge on a per-component basis in industry. A number of challenges are identified to the broad application of a component DT; all lead to uncertainty in properties and locations, resolving these requires judgments to be made in the provision of safety-dependent materials property data.","PeriodicalId":34169,"journal":{"name":"DataCentric Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DataCentric Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dce.2022.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract The rapid development of new infrastructure programmes requires an accelerated deployment of new materials in new environments. Materials 4.0 is crucial to achieve these goals. The application of digital to the field of materials has been at the forefront of research for many years, but there does not exist a unified means to describe a framework for this area creating pockets of development. This is confounded by the broader expectations of a digital twin (DT) as the possible answer to all these problems. The issue being that there is no accepted definition of a component DT, and what information it should contain and how it can be implemented across the product lifecycle exist. Within this position paper, a clear distinction is made between the “manufacturing DT” and the “component DT”; the former being the starting boundary conditions of the latter. In order to achieve this, we also discuss the introduction of a digital thread as a key concept in passing data through manufacturing and into service. The stages of how to define a framework around the development of DTs from a materials perspective is given, which acknowledges the difference between creating new understanding within academia and the application of this knowledge on a per-component basis in industry. A number of challenges are identified to the broad application of a component DT; all lead to uncertainty in properties and locations, resolving these requires judgments to be made in the provision of safety-dependent materials property data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
材料4.0与数字孪生交互指南
摘要新基础设施计划的快速发展要求在新环境中加快部署新材料。材料4.0对于实现这些目标至关重要。多年来,数字在材料领域的应用一直处于研究的前沿,但目前还没有一种统一的方法来描述这一领域的框架,从而创造出一些发展空间。这与数字孪生(DT)作为所有这些问题的可能答案的更广泛期望相混淆。问题是,组件DT没有公认的定义,它应该包含什么信息,以及如何在整个产品生命周期中实现。在本立场文件中,明确区分了“制造DT”和“部件DT”;前者是后者的起始边界条件。为了实现这一点,我们还讨论了引入数字线程,将其作为通过制造和服务传递数据的关键概念。给出了如何从材料的角度定义DTs发展的框架的各个阶段,这承认了在学术界创造新的理解和在工业中基于每个组件应用这些知识之间的区别。DT组件的广泛应用面临许多挑战;所有这些都会导致特性和位置的不确定性,解决这些问题需要在提供安全相关材料特性数据时做出判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DataCentric Engineering
DataCentric Engineering Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Semantic 3D city interfaces—Intelligent interactions on dynamic geospatial knowledge graphs Optical network physical layer parameter optimization for digital backpropagation using Gaussian processes Finite element model updating with quantified uncertainties using point cloud data Evaluating probabilistic forecasts for maritime engineering operations Bottom-up forecasting: Applications and limitations in load forecasting using smart-meter data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1