Subsequent cholecystectomy improve recurrent biliary event-free survival in high-risk acute cholecystitis patients after gallbladder drainage

IF 0.3 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Advances in Digestive Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.1002/aid2.13358
Chi-Chih Wang, Chang-Cheng Su, Yen-Pin Huang, Wen-Hsin Huang, Tsung-Yu Tsai, Wen-Wei Sung, Tzu-Wei Yang, Jaw-Town Lin, Chun-Che Lin, Hsu-Heng Yen, Ming-Chang Tsai
{"title":"Subsequent cholecystectomy improve recurrent biliary event-free survival in high-risk acute cholecystitis patients after gallbladder drainage","authors":"Chi-Chih Wang,&nbsp;Chang-Cheng Su,&nbsp;Yen-Pin Huang,&nbsp;Wen-Hsin Huang,&nbsp;Tsung-Yu Tsai,&nbsp;Wen-Wei Sung,&nbsp;Tzu-Wei Yang,&nbsp;Jaw-Town Lin,&nbsp;Chun-Che Lin,&nbsp;Hsu-Heng Yen,&nbsp;Ming-Chang Tsai","doi":"10.1002/aid2.13358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cholelithiasis is a disease with increasing prevalence over the decades. Gallbladder drainage (GBD) is an alternative choice in critically ill patients who cannot tolerate early surgery for acute cholecystitis. In previous data, early or delayed cholecystectomy (CCY) leads to less recurrent biliary events (RBEs) comparing to using a wait-and-see strategy. We wondered if a subsequent CCY strategy after GBD can benefit patients with high surgical risk. This study aimed to explore the clinical outcome after percutaneous transhepatic GBD and risk factors for RBEs. We studied 180 adult acute cholecystitis patients who received percutaneous transhepatic GBD during index admission between July 2017 and December 2018 in Chung Shan Medical University Hospital and Changhua Christian Hospital after exclusion of patients died during the index admission or lost follow-up within 30 days. We further divided these patients into those who received subsequent CCY within 2 months and those who received no CCY within 2 months. RBEs, mortality, and biliary event-related mortality were compared. Multivariate analysis was applied to find the most important factors of RBE-free survival. There were 8 cases (13.6%) in the subsequent CCY group that experienced recurrent biliary events, whereas 39 cases (32.2%) experienced recurrent biliary events in the no CCY within 2 months group. The proportion and average recurrent biliary events per person were all significantly lower in the subsequent CCY group. Although the overall mortality rate was higher in the group that had no CCY within 2 months (16.5% vs 5.1%), the RBE-related mortality difference was insignificant. The most decisive factor to determine RBE-free survival is whether there was a subsequent CCY or not (HR: 0.485, 95% CI: 0.250-0.941, <i>P</i> = .032). We found that subsequent CCY can decrease further RBEs and improve RBE-free survival in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis that accepted percutaneous transhepatic GBD initially.</p>","PeriodicalId":7278,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Digestive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aid2.13358","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Digestive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aid2.13358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cholelithiasis is a disease with increasing prevalence over the decades. Gallbladder drainage (GBD) is an alternative choice in critically ill patients who cannot tolerate early surgery for acute cholecystitis. In previous data, early or delayed cholecystectomy (CCY) leads to less recurrent biliary events (RBEs) comparing to using a wait-and-see strategy. We wondered if a subsequent CCY strategy after GBD can benefit patients with high surgical risk. This study aimed to explore the clinical outcome after percutaneous transhepatic GBD and risk factors for RBEs. We studied 180 adult acute cholecystitis patients who received percutaneous transhepatic GBD during index admission between July 2017 and December 2018 in Chung Shan Medical University Hospital and Changhua Christian Hospital after exclusion of patients died during the index admission or lost follow-up within 30 days. We further divided these patients into those who received subsequent CCY within 2 months and those who received no CCY within 2 months. RBEs, mortality, and biliary event-related mortality were compared. Multivariate analysis was applied to find the most important factors of RBE-free survival. There were 8 cases (13.6%) in the subsequent CCY group that experienced recurrent biliary events, whereas 39 cases (32.2%) experienced recurrent biliary events in the no CCY within 2 months group. The proportion and average recurrent biliary events per person were all significantly lower in the subsequent CCY group. Although the overall mortality rate was higher in the group that had no CCY within 2 months (16.5% vs 5.1%), the RBE-related mortality difference was insignificant. The most decisive factor to determine RBE-free survival is whether there was a subsequent CCY or not (HR: 0.485, 95% CI: 0.250-0.941, P = .032). We found that subsequent CCY can decrease further RBEs and improve RBE-free survival in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis that accepted percutaneous transhepatic GBD initially.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后续胆囊切除术提高高危急性胆囊炎患者胆囊引流后复发性胆汁无事件生存率
几十年来,胆石症的发病率越来越高。对于不能耐受急性胆囊炎早期手术的重症患者来说,胆囊引流术(GBD)是另一种选择。根据以往的数据,与采取观望策略相比,早期或延迟胆囊切除术(CCY)可减少胆道事件(RBE)的复发。我们想知道,GBD 后的后续 CCY 策略能否使手术风险高的患者受益。本研究旨在探讨经皮经肝胆道造影术(GBD)后的临床疗效和 RBE 的风险因素。我们研究了2017年7月至2018年12月期间在中山医科大学附属医院和彰化基督教医院接受经皮经肝GBD治疗的180例成人急性胆囊炎患者,排除了在入院时死亡或在30天内失去随访的患者。我们进一步将这些患者分为 2 个月内接受后续 CCY 的患者和 2 个月内未接受 CCY 的患者。比较了 RBE、死亡率和胆道事件相关死亡率。我们应用多变量分析找出了影响无 RBE 存活率的最重要因素。接受后续CCY治疗组中有8例(13.6%)出现复发性胆道事件,而2个月内未接受CCY治疗组中有39例(32.2%)出现复发性胆道事件。在随后的 CCY 组中,每人发生复发性胆道事件的比例和平均值都明显较低。虽然 2 个月内未进行 CCY 组的总死亡率更高(16.5% 对 5.1%),但与 RBE 相关的死亡率差异并不显著。决定无 RBE 生存率的最决定性因素是后续是否进行了 CCY(HR:0.485,95% CI:0.250-0.941,P = 0.032)。我们发现,对于最初接受经皮经肝 GBD 的急性胆囊炎高危患者,后续 CCY 可减少进一步的 RBE,提高无 RBE 生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Digestive Medicine
Advances in Digestive Medicine GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Advances in Digestive Medicine is the official peer-reviewed journal of GEST, DEST and TASL. Missions of AIDM are to enhance the quality of patient care, to promote researches in gastroenterology, endoscopy and hepatology related fields, and to develop platforms for digestive science. Specific areas of interest are included, but not limited to: • Acid-related disease • Small intestinal disease • Digestive cancer • Diagnostic & therapeutic endoscopy • Enteral nutrition • Innovation in endoscopic technology • Functional GI • Hepatitis • GI images • Liver cirrhosis • Gut hormone • NASH • Helicobacter pylori • Cancer screening • IBD • Laparoscopic surgery • Infectious disease of digestive tract • Genetics and metabolic disorder • Microbiota • Regenerative medicine • Pancreaticobiliary disease • Guideline & consensus.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The nursing roles in caring for patients with inflammatory bowel disease A comparative analysis of radiation exposure in endoscopic ultrasound‐guided drainage versus endoscopic transpapillary drainage for acute cholecystitis An unusual subepithelial tumor of gastritis cystica profunda Unusual gastric polyp
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1