Experimental review on the effective stress equation in sand–EPS mixtures

Mehran Karimpour Fard, Erfan Ashouryan, Ghazal Rezaie Soufi, S. Machado
{"title":"Experimental review on the effective stress equation in sand–EPS mixtures","authors":"Mehran Karimpour Fard, Erfan Ashouryan, Ghazal Rezaie Soufi, S. Machado","doi":"10.1080/17486025.2022.2056642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Employing Expanded PolyStyrene, EPS has become common in the construction industry, however, their compressibility creates complexities in effective stress analysis. In this paper, the compressibility of EPS beads and the overall compressibility of sand–EPS beads mixtures have been evaluated. Drained and undrained one-dimensional compression tests along with CD and CU triaxial tests were performed on the mixtures to evaluate the classic effective stress equation. Modified versions of the effective stress equation were applied to results and pore pressure correction factors were obtained from both data series based on two different effective stress analysis approaches (volume change and shear strength related) and compared. Results showed that the two sets of correction factors are consistent. Therefore, correction factors obtained based on the compressibility parameters of the mixtures can be used in the effective stress analysis of CU triaxial tests. Pore pressure factors obtained from the oedometer data were used to analyze results of CU triaxial tests. It is shown that a better agreement between CD and CU stress path results is obtained when the EPS compressibility is considered, leading to similar effective strength parameters in both conditions.","PeriodicalId":46470,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics and Geoengineering-An International Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"380 - 393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics and Geoengineering-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2022.2056642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Employing Expanded PolyStyrene, EPS has become common in the construction industry, however, their compressibility creates complexities in effective stress analysis. In this paper, the compressibility of EPS beads and the overall compressibility of sand–EPS beads mixtures have been evaluated. Drained and undrained one-dimensional compression tests along with CD and CU triaxial tests were performed on the mixtures to evaluate the classic effective stress equation. Modified versions of the effective stress equation were applied to results and pore pressure correction factors were obtained from both data series based on two different effective stress analysis approaches (volume change and shear strength related) and compared. Results showed that the two sets of correction factors are consistent. Therefore, correction factors obtained based on the compressibility parameters of the mixtures can be used in the effective stress analysis of CU triaxial tests. Pore pressure factors obtained from the oedometer data were used to analyze results of CU triaxial tests. It is shown that a better agreement between CD and CU stress path results is obtained when the EPS compressibility is considered, leading to similar effective strength parameters in both conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
砂-EPS混合料有效应力方程的实验研究进展
摘要采用发泡聚苯乙烯的EPS在建筑行业已经很常见,但其可压缩性使有效应力分析变得复杂。本文对EPS珠粒的压缩性和砂-EPS珠粒混合物的整体压缩性进行了评估。对混合物进行了排水和不排水一维压缩试验以及CD和CU三轴试验,以评估经典的有效应力方程。基于两种不同的有效应力分析方法(体积变化和抗剪强度相关),将有效应力方程的修改版本应用于结果,并从两个数据系列中获得孔隙压力校正因子,并进行比较。结果表明,两组校正因子是一致的。因此,基于混合物压缩性参数获得的修正系数可用于CU三轴试验的有效应力分析。从固结仪数据中获得的孔隙压力因子用于分析CU三轴试验的结果。结果表明,当考虑EPS压缩性时,CD和CU应力路径结果之间的一致性更好,导致两种条件下的有效强度参数相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Geomechanics is concerned with the application of the principle of mechanics to earth-materials (namely geo-material). Geoengineering covers a wide range of engineering disciplines related to geo-materials, such as foundation engineering, slope engineering, tunnelling, rock engineering, engineering geology and geo-environmental engineering. Geomechanics and Geoengineering is a major publication channel for research in the areas of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical and geological engineering, engineering geology, geo-environmental engineering and all geo-material related engineering and science disciplines. The Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of innovative ideas, especially between researchers in Asia and the rest of the world.
期刊最新文献
Analytical evaluation of partially stiffened granular piled raft with the effect of rigidity of bearing stratum A parametric study on deformation behaviour for design of braced excavation in soft clay Effect of leachate and used motor oil on the geotechnical and mechanical characteristics of soils with different mineralogy under different moisture conditions Influence of edge distance on experimental p-y curves for piles near slope Performance of loosely skirted square footing resting on reinforced sand under vertical concentric and eccentric loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1