Elected Power in the Petrograd Garrison in 1917–1918

K. Tarasov
{"title":"Elected Power in the Petrograd Garrison in 1917–1918","authors":"K. Tarasov","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2017.1396820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the question of power in the Petrograd garrison throughout the Russian revolution 1917. The strict military hierarchy, discipline, and complete submission of the rank-and-file to the officer was destroyed after the February insurrection. To smooth out the contradictions within the military units, elective self-government bodies—regimental committees—were created. In all military units of Petrograd, those officers who were cruelly brutalized by soldiers were replaced by more loyal ones. The new authorities, however, very quickly ceased to meet the interests of the soldiers. Lower ranks tried to achieve direct democracy and so held all-regiment meetings, on which important issues were solved together. In a number of cases it was the all-regiment meetings that enjoyed the greater confidence of the soldiers than the ones from the more educated regimental committees. In fact, the committees began to depend on the opinion of the meetings. An attempt to regain control over the Petrograd garrison resulted in the introduction of the Institution of the Commissar of the Military Revolutionary Committee. The Commissars were initially appointed by the Soviet and were to carry out its policies. However, very soon they also became dependent on the opinions of the soldiers. The Commissar position became elected. The article concludes that any attempts to control direct democracy ended without success until the army was demobilized.","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"56 1","pages":"273 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611983.2017.1396820","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian studies in history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2017.1396820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the question of power in the Petrograd garrison throughout the Russian revolution 1917. The strict military hierarchy, discipline, and complete submission of the rank-and-file to the officer was destroyed after the February insurrection. To smooth out the contradictions within the military units, elective self-government bodies—regimental committees—were created. In all military units of Petrograd, those officers who were cruelly brutalized by soldiers were replaced by more loyal ones. The new authorities, however, very quickly ceased to meet the interests of the soldiers. Lower ranks tried to achieve direct democracy and so held all-regiment meetings, on which important issues were solved together. In a number of cases it was the all-regiment meetings that enjoyed the greater confidence of the soldiers than the ones from the more educated regimental committees. In fact, the committees began to depend on the opinion of the meetings. An attempt to regain control over the Petrograd garrison resulted in the introduction of the Institution of the Commissar of the Military Revolutionary Committee. The Commissars were initially appointed by the Soviet and were to carry out its policies. However, very soon they also became dependent on the opinions of the soldiers. The Commissar position became elected. The article concludes that any attempts to control direct democracy ended without success until the army was demobilized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1917–1918年彼得格勒驻军的民选政权
这篇文章专门讨论1917年俄罗斯革命期间彼得格勒驻军的权力问题。严格的军事等级制度、纪律和对军官的完全服从在二月暴动后被摧毁。为了解决军队内部的矛盾,成立了选举产生的自治机构——团委。在彼得格勒的所有军事单位,那些被士兵残酷虐待的军官都被更忠诚的军官所取代。然而,新当局很快就不再满足士兵的利益。下级努力实现直接民主,因此召开了所有团会议,重要问题一起解决。在许多情况下,全团会议比受过更高教育的团委员会会议更受士兵的信任。事实上,委员会开始依赖会议的意见。为了重新控制彼得格勒驻军,成立了军事革命委员会政委机构。政委最初由苏联任命,负责执行其政策。然而,很快他们也开始依赖士兵们的意见。政委职位由选举产生。文章的结论是,任何控制直接民主的企图都没有成功,直到军队复员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
War and Peace in “Asiatic Russia” The Russian Army in the Caucasus: A War of Private Actors Special Features and Mechanisms of Russia’s Trade and Economic Activities in Persia through Astrakhan in the First Half of the Eighteenth Century Conflict as a Resource: An Anatomy of the “Turkmen Unrest” in Khorezm, 1914–1916 Early Modern Trade in the Caspian Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1