Assessment of Functional Outcome and Donor Site Morbidity in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Peroneus Longus Autograft

V. Agrawal, H. Ravikiran, M. Santhosh, C. Vijay, B. S. Prashasth, A. Chandra
{"title":"Assessment of Functional Outcome and Donor Site Morbidity in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Peroneus Longus Autograft","authors":"V. Agrawal, H. Ravikiran, M. Santhosh, C. Vijay, B. S. Prashasth, A. Chandra","doi":"10.46347/jmsh.2022.v8i1.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is one of the most successful surgeries in sports medicine. But the donor site morbidities have been reported with bone patellar tendon bone graft and hamstring tendon graft. The objective of the study is to evaluate the functional outcome of and donor site (ankle) morbidities with full thickness peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: A Prospective study was done in 30 patients with ACL injury. Knee stability and function were evaluated using the Lachman test, pivot shift test, International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC) and Lysholm knee score. Donor ankle was assessed using American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) and grading muscle power by Medical Research Council scale. Data collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 & 12 months were compared. Results: The IKDC score was normal or nearly normal in 24 patients and abnormal in 6 patients. The mean Lysholm score had excellent or good results in 24 patients. The Lachman test showed normal findings in 24 patients, 6 patients had 1+ laxity. The pivot-shift test was negative in 22 patients and 8 patients had 1+ glide. The mean AOFAS score was 100±0.0 (preoperatively) and 96.0±9.6 (at final follow up). No patient experienced ankle pain and instability. Conclusion: PLT autograft gave painless stable knee, with a good range of motion. It didn’t have any morbid effect on ankle and gait parameters. So, PLT autograft can be suitable graft with respect to its strength, safety and donor site morbidity. Keywords: ACL, Peroneus Longus Tendon, Knee Arthroscopy","PeriodicalId":33653,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Sciences and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Sciences and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46347/jmsh.2022.v8i1.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is one of the most successful surgeries in sports medicine. But the donor site morbidities have been reported with bone patellar tendon bone graft and hamstring tendon graft. The objective of the study is to evaluate the functional outcome of and donor site (ankle) morbidities with full thickness peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: A Prospective study was done in 30 patients with ACL injury. Knee stability and function were evaluated using the Lachman test, pivot shift test, International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC) and Lysholm knee score. Donor ankle was assessed using American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) and grading muscle power by Medical Research Council scale. Data collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 & 12 months were compared. Results: The IKDC score was normal or nearly normal in 24 patients and abnormal in 6 patients. The mean Lysholm score had excellent or good results in 24 patients. The Lachman test showed normal findings in 24 patients, 6 patients had 1+ laxity. The pivot-shift test was negative in 22 patients and 8 patients had 1+ glide. The mean AOFAS score was 100±0.0 (preoperatively) and 96.0±9.6 (at final follow up). No patient experienced ankle pain and instability. Conclusion: PLT autograft gave painless stable knee, with a good range of motion. It didn’t have any morbid effect on ankle and gait parameters. So, PLT autograft can be suitable graft with respect to its strength, safety and donor site morbidity. Keywords: ACL, Peroneus Longus Tendon, Knee Arthroscopy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用腓骨长肌自体移植物重建前交叉韧带的功能结果和供区发病率评估
引言:关节镜下ACL重建是运动医学中最成功的手术之一。但骨-髌腱-骨移植物和腘绳肌腱移植物的供区疾病已有报道。本研究的目的是评估关节镜下前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中自体全厚腓骨长肌腱(PLT)移植的功能结果和供区(脚踝)疾病的发生率。方法:对30例ACL损伤患者进行前瞻性研究。使用Lachman试验、枢轴移位试验、国际膝关节文献委员会评分(IKDC)和Lysholm膝关节评分评估膝关节稳定性和功能。供体踝关节使用美国骨科足部和踝关节评分(AOFAS)进行评估,并通过医学研究委员会量表对肌肉力量进行分级。比较术前和术后6个月和12个月收集的数据。结果:IKDC评分正常或接近正常者24例,异常者6例。平均Lysholm评分在24例患者中具有优良或良好的结果。Lachman试验显示24名患者的检查结果正常,6名患者出现1+松懈。22名患者的枢轴移位测试为阴性,8名患者的滑动量为1+。平均AOFAS评分分别为100±0.0(术前)和96.0±9.6(最终随访时)。没有患者出现脚踝疼痛和不稳定。结论:自体PLT移植膝关节无痛稳定,活动范围好。它对脚踝和步态参数没有任何病态影响。因此,PLT自体移植物在强度、安全性和供区发病率方面都是合适的移植物。关键词:ACL,腓骨长肌腱,膝关节镜检查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 Vaccination-Associated Spontaneous Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Syndrome A Cross-sectional Observational Study of the Etio-pathology, Socioeconomic Distribution and Clinical Pictures of Ectopic Pregnancy in a Tertiary Medical College and Hospital in Bankura, West Bengal, India Pattern of Thyroid Dysfunction in Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients in a Tertiary Care Center: A Cross-Sectional Study Clinical Profile of Anterior Uveitis in Tertiary Eye Care Center Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Intraperitoneal Instillation of Bupivacaine after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy – A Randomized Control Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1