Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Men Compared to Women with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Colombia

Q3 Nursing Aquichan Pub Date : 2021-04-16 DOI:10.5294/AQUI.2021.21.1.6
J. Betancourt-Peña, Juan Carlos Ávila Valencia, Arley Facundo Duarte
{"title":"Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Men Compared to Women with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Colombia","authors":"J. Betancourt-Peña, Juan Carlos Ávila Valencia, Arley Facundo Duarte","doi":"10.5294/AQUI.2021.21.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in men and women with a COPD diagnosis in a Colombian clinic.\n\nMethod: A longitudinal and descriptive study was conducted with 75 COPD patients who entered a pulmonary rehabilitation program during 2018 and 2019. The population was divided into groups according to gender and some sociodemographic characteristics were assessed, such as spirometry expressed in percentage of the predicted value, body mass index, mMRC dyspnea, and capacity for physical exercise, as well as some physiological variables with the six-minute walk test, anxiety-depression (HADS) and quality of life (SGRQ). A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.\n\nResults: The cigarette packs smoked per year index was higher in men, 34±29.11 (p<0.001), whereas the exposure to firewood smoke was five times higher in women (p=0.037). All the variables related to the capacity for physical exercise improved significantly (p<0.021), with distance covered standing out: 63.26±60.03 vs. 51.53±61.02 in favor of women. mMRC dyspnea was initially higher in women when compared to men, 0.709±0.287, and presented a greater change in women with 1.294±0.415 when compared to men, 0.736±0.880, at the end of pulmonary rehabilitation.\n\nConclusion: Pulmonary rehabilitation in women shows an increase of 63.26 meters in the distance covered and a 1.294-point reduction in dyspnea; while, for men, these figures were 51.53 meters and 0.736 points, respectively, as well as an improvement in quality of life in men by 11.47 SGRQ points when compared to women: 0.600.","PeriodicalId":50736,"journal":{"name":"Aquichan","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquichan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5294/AQUI.2021.21.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in men and women with a COPD diagnosis in a Colombian clinic. Method: A longitudinal and descriptive study was conducted with 75 COPD patients who entered a pulmonary rehabilitation program during 2018 and 2019. The population was divided into groups according to gender and some sociodemographic characteristics were assessed, such as spirometry expressed in percentage of the predicted value, body mass index, mMRC dyspnea, and capacity for physical exercise, as well as some physiological variables with the six-minute walk test, anxiety-depression (HADS) and quality of life (SGRQ). A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The cigarette packs smoked per year index was higher in men, 34±29.11 (p<0.001), whereas the exposure to firewood smoke was five times higher in women (p=0.037). All the variables related to the capacity for physical exercise improved significantly (p<0.021), with distance covered standing out: 63.26±60.03 vs. 51.53±61.02 in favor of women. mMRC dyspnea was initially higher in women when compared to men, 0.709±0.287, and presented a greater change in women with 1.294±0.415 when compared to men, 0.736±0.880, at the end of pulmonary rehabilitation. Conclusion: Pulmonary rehabilitation in women shows an increase of 63.26 meters in the distance covered and a 1.294-point reduction in dyspnea; while, for men, these figures were 51.53 meters and 0.736 points, respectively, as well as an improvement in quality of life in men by 11.47 SGRQ points when compared to women: 0.600.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥伦比亚男性与女性慢性阻塞性肺病患者肺部康复效果的比较
目的:确定在哥伦比亚诊所诊断为COPD的男性和女性的肺部康复效果。方法:对2018年和2019年期间参加肺部康复计划的75名COPD患者进行纵向描述性研究。根据性别将人群分组,并评估一些社会人口学特征,如肺活量测定法(以预测值的百分比表示)、体重指数、mMRC呼吸困难和体育锻炼能力,以及一些生理变量,如6分钟步行测试、焦虑抑郁(HADS)和生活质量(SGRQ)。p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:男性的年吸烟量指数更高,为34±29.11(p<0.001),而女性的柴烟暴露量则高出5倍(p=0.037)。与体育锻炼能力相关的所有变量都显著改善(p<0.021),其中覆盖距离突出:女性为63.26±60.03,女性为51.53±61.02。与男性相比,女性的mMRC呼吸困难最初更高,为0.709±0.287,在肺部康复结束时,女性的变化更大,为1.294±0.415,与男性相比为0.736±0.880。结论:女性的肺部康复显示,在所走的距离内增加了63.26米,呼吸困难减少了1.294个百分点;而男性的这一数字分别为51.53米和0.736分,与女性相比,男性的生活质量提高了11.47 SGRQ分:0.600。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aquichan
Aquichan NURSING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aquichan, a journal of medical and health sciences from the field of health sciences and, more specifically, nursing, publishes articles resulting from investigations from a point of view of epistemology, evidence-based practice, chronic care, promotion and prevention. The articles are for the academic and scientific community, both in Colombia and abroad. The journal accepts original, previously unpublished papers in Spanish, English, and Portuguese, which are the product of a research or a review and which are not being evaluated by other scientific journals, either in print or electronic form.
期刊最新文献
Functional Capacity and Self-Care in Post-COVID-19 Patients in a Recovery Program Nursing Care to Promote Comfort for People in Palliative Care: A Scoping Review Nursing Palliative Care for Elderly Surgical Patients: A Scoping Review Potential Therapeutic use of Anredera cordifolia in Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases: A Scoping Review Self-Care in Nursing Professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1