Comparative Study of the Non-Profit Sectors of Pakistan and India

IF 0.4 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION China Nonprofit Review Pub Date : 2017-06-20 DOI:10.1163/18765149-12341325
Zunaira Saqib, V. Fournier, Geoffrey Lightfoot
{"title":"Comparative Study of the Non-Profit Sectors of Pakistan and India","authors":"Zunaira Saqib, V. Fournier, Geoffrey Lightfoot","doi":"10.1163/18765149-12341325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a theoretical paper that has analysed more than 55 publications to draw comparison between Pakistan and India non-profit sectors. The two countries share their history under British rule before 1947 partition. Before the partition the non-profit sector saw a rise under different religious umbrellas, however after the partition the sectors saw a rise in nonreligious, non-political organizations in both countries. The paper draws the similarities and differences among the types of organizations, funding sources, giving, and legal framework. The paper debates the reasons for different evolutions of the sectors in post-independence era and its reasons. The findings show that both sectors evolved different due to differences in religious influence, political instability, and check and balance systems. The paper aims to contribute in depth analysis of the both sectors in the literature.","PeriodicalId":41661,"journal":{"name":"China Nonprofit Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"108-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18765149-12341325","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Nonprofit Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18765149-12341325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This is a theoretical paper that has analysed more than 55 publications to draw comparison between Pakistan and India non-profit sectors. The two countries share their history under British rule before 1947 partition. Before the partition the non-profit sector saw a rise under different religious umbrellas, however after the partition the sectors saw a rise in nonreligious, non-political organizations in both countries. The paper draws the similarities and differences among the types of organizations, funding sources, giving, and legal framework. The paper debates the reasons for different evolutions of the sectors in post-independence era and its reasons. The findings show that both sectors evolved different due to differences in religious influence, political instability, and check and balance systems. The paper aims to contribute in depth analysis of the both sectors in the literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦和印度非营利部门的比较研究
这是一篇理论论文,分析了55多份出版物,对巴基斯坦和印度的非营利部门进行了比较。这两个国家有着1947年分治前英国统治下的共同历史。在分治之前,非营利部门在不同的宗教保护伞下有所增加,但在分治之后,两国的非宗教、非政治组织都有所增加。本文从组织类型、资金来源、捐赠和法律框架等方面总结了组织的异同。本文论述了后独立时代各部门不同演变的原因及其原因。研究结果表明,由于宗教影响、政治不稳定和制衡制度的差异,这两个部门的发展方式不同。本文旨在对这两个领域的文献进行深入分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
China Nonprofit Review
China Nonprofit Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
336
期刊最新文献
Excluded from Political Task: NGO s’ Marginalized Participation in China’s Accurate Poverty Alleviation Project Retrospective Observations on “Legitimacy” of Charitable Fundraising amid COVID-19 Community Resilience: A New Theme in Modernizing Community-Level Governance System and Capability in China Regulating Emergency Volunteer Management to Promote the Development of Emergency Response Voluntary Services Is It a “Window of Opportunity” to Develop a New Normal of Government-Society Cooperation in Emergency Management?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1