EFFECTS OF VOLATILITY AMONG COMMODITIES IN THE LONG TERM: ANALYSIS OF A COMPLEX NETWORK

IF 2 0 ECONOMICS Annals of Financial Economics Pub Date : 2020-11-27 DOI:10.1142/s2010495220500141
Marcelo de Oliveira Passos, M. Tessmann, Regis A. Ely, Daniel Uhr, Márcio Taceli Taveira
{"title":"EFFECTS OF VOLATILITY AMONG COMMODITIES IN THE LONG TERM: ANALYSIS OF A COMPLEX NETWORK","authors":"Marcelo de Oliveira Passos, M. Tessmann, Regis A. Ely, Daniel Uhr, Márcio Taceli Taveira","doi":"10.1142/s2010495220500141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The large inflow of investment capital in critical periods sparked a debate about the extent to which these speculative bubbles affect asset volatility and how (and what extent) these volatilities are transmitted between them. In periods of greater uncertainty, commodity futures markets may receive and/or send two types of volatility spillovers: intergroup of assets and/or intragroup of assets. We tested for the period from March 3, 2000 to May 4, 2017, which of the two effects prevailed and in which group of assets was more intense. We concluded that the most relevant volatility transmission effects (measured by Diebold–Yilmaz indices) occurred intragroup of assets — corn, wheat, soy, oats and rice. These assets make up the main cluster of a commodities complex network. Thus, we detected and measured using network approach that the most significant effects was over the years of the Great Recession (2007–2009) and the peak of the European Sovereign Debt Crisis (2010–2012).","PeriodicalId":43570,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Financial Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"2050014"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Financial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010495220500141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The large inflow of investment capital in critical periods sparked a debate about the extent to which these speculative bubbles affect asset volatility and how (and what extent) these volatilities are transmitted between them. In periods of greater uncertainty, commodity futures markets may receive and/or send two types of volatility spillovers: intergroup of assets and/or intragroup of assets. We tested for the period from March 3, 2000 to May 4, 2017, which of the two effects prevailed and in which group of assets was more intense. We concluded that the most relevant volatility transmission effects (measured by Diebold–Yilmaz indices) occurred intragroup of assets — corn, wheat, soy, oats and rice. These assets make up the main cluster of a commodities complex network. Thus, we detected and measured using network approach that the most significant effects was over the years of the Great Recession (2007–2009) and the peak of the European Sovereign Debt Crisis (2010–2012).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期内商品波动的影响:一个复杂网络的分析
关键时期投资资本的大量流入引发了一场辩论,讨论这些投机泡沫在多大程度上影响资产波动,以及这些波动如何(以及在多大范围内)在它们之间传递。在不确定性较大的时期,大宗商品期货市场可能会接收和/或发送两种类型的波动溢出:资产组间和/或资产组内。我们测试了2000年3月3日至2017年5月4日这段时间,这两种影响中哪一种占主导地位,哪一组资产更为强烈。我们得出的结论是,最相关的波动性传导效应(由Diebold–Yilmaz指数衡量)发生在玉米、小麦、大豆、燕麦和大米等资产组内。这些资产构成了大宗商品综合网络的主要集群。因此,我们使用网络方法检测和衡量了最显著的影响是在大衰退(2007-2009年)和欧洲主权债务危机(2010-2012年)的高峰期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
55.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
How Do Remittance Inflows Cause the Dutch Disease in the Financial Sector? The Role of Financial Risk and Human Capital Factors Affecting the Crude Oil Prices Volatility: A Case Study of the USA, China, Japan, Germany and India The Emerging Stock Markets and Their Asymmetric Response to Infectious Disease Equity Market Volatility (ID-EMV) Index Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Rising Effects of Renewable Energy Consumption and Climate Risk Development Finance: Evidence from BRICS Countries Potential Welfare Gains from Optimal Macro Hedging for Oil Exporters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1