Surviving on the brink: New Zealand Workers, unions and employment relations, 1991-2008

IF 0.6 4区 历史学 Q3 Arts and Humanities Labour History Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.5263/LABOURHISTORY.115.0067
G. Lafferty, S. Dorsett
{"title":"Surviving on the brink: New Zealand Workers, unions and employment relations, 1991-2008","authors":"G. Lafferty, S. Dorsett","doi":"10.5263/LABOURHISTORY.115.0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New Zealand's Fourth Labour Government (1984-90) implemented a remarkably rapid process of economic privatisation, decentralisation and deregulation. However, it was only under the National Party Government (1990-99) that this process was extended comprehensively to employment relations, with its Employment Contracts Act 1991 (ECA). The ECA had devastating impacts on union membership, collective bargaining and employment conditions. The election of a Labour-led government in 1999, followed by its Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA), promised a less hostile climate for workers and unions. This paper examines employment relations in New Zealand under these two legislative regimes, from 1991 to 2008. First, it evaluates how the ECA's largely decentralised, deregulated environment transformed employment relations and how workers, unions and employers responded to it. Second, it assesses how the ERA contributed to a cultural change that encouraged workers, unions and employers to develop more strategic approaches to employment relations. It illustrates how this change, coupled with the introduction of important statutory entitlements for all workers, helped to prevent any resurgence of the right-wing politics that fuelled the ECA.","PeriodicalId":44167,"journal":{"name":"Labour History","volume":"1 1","pages":"67-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5263/LABOURHISTORY.115.0067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

New Zealand's Fourth Labour Government (1984-90) implemented a remarkably rapid process of economic privatisation, decentralisation and deregulation. However, it was only under the National Party Government (1990-99) that this process was extended comprehensively to employment relations, with its Employment Contracts Act 1991 (ECA). The ECA had devastating impacts on union membership, collective bargaining and employment conditions. The election of a Labour-led government in 1999, followed by its Employment Relations Act 2000 (ERA), promised a less hostile climate for workers and unions. This paper examines employment relations in New Zealand under these two legislative regimes, from 1991 to 2008. First, it evaluates how the ECA's largely decentralised, deregulated environment transformed employment relations and how workers, unions and employers responded to it. Second, it assesses how the ERA contributed to a cultural change that encouraged workers, unions and employers to develop more strategic approaches to employment relations. It illustrates how this change, coupled with the introduction of important statutory entitlements for all workers, helped to prevent any resurgence of the right-wing politics that fuelled the ECA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在边缘生存:新西兰工人、工会和就业关系,1991-2008年
新西兰第四届工党政府(1984-90年)实施了一个非常迅速的经济私有化、权力下放和放松管制的进程。然而,只有在国家党政府(1990-99年)的领导下,这一过程才通过其1991年《就业合同法》(ECA)全面扩展到就业关系。非洲经委会对工会成员资格、集体谈判和就业条件产生了毁灭性影响。1999年,工党领导的政府当选,随后又通过了《2000年就业关系法》(ERA),这为工人和工会带来了一个不那么敌对的环境。本文考察了1991年至2008年在这两个立法制度下新西兰的就业关系。首先,它评估了非洲经委会在很大程度上分散、放松管制的环境是如何改变就业关系的,以及工人、工会和雇主是如何应对这种关系的。其次,它还评估了ERA是如何促进文化变革的,鼓励工作人员、工会和雇主们制定更具战略性的就业关系方法。它说明了这一变化,再加上为所有工人引入重要的法定权利,如何有助于防止助长非洲经委会的右翼政治死灰复燃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Labour History
Labour History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The Fragility of Governmentality and Domination: The State, Carceral Labour and “(In)docile Resistance” in the Late Ottoman Empire “At Work, in Hospital, or in Gaol”: Women in British Guiana’s Jails, 1838–1917 Peter John Love (1947–2023) The Unreliable Witness: Clarence Dakin, ASIO, and Espionage British Colonialism and Prison Labour in Inter-War Palestine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1