Will Facebook Encourage Citizen Participation?

IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.4018/IJPADA.2019010101
Pin-Yu Chu, Hsien-Lee Tseng, Yu-Jui Chen
{"title":"Will Facebook Encourage Citizen Participation?","authors":"Pin-Yu Chu, Hsien-Lee Tseng, Yu-Jui Chen","doi":"10.4018/IJPADA.2019010101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Facebook, the most popular social media in the world, has changed the ways of citizen involvement in governance. Politicians and (elected) public administrators worldwide have adopted Facebook as an important approach to connect with citizens. This study explores whether the Facebook phenomenon can improve the process of online political communication and citizen participation. The study adapts a content analysis method and proposes six strategies for analyzing Facebook page posts of Taiwanese legislators. The authors compare Facebook posts during both election and regular sessions to see the difference in patterns of these posts and communication strategies adopted by the legislators. The findings reveal that a percentage of e-participation achieves an acceptable rate, but most communication of legislator Facebook is one way. The results indicate that legislators' Facebook is another platform to distribute public information to citizens, and many have potential to create more public values.","PeriodicalId":42809,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4018/IJPADA.2019010101","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJPADA.2019010101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Facebook, the most popular social media in the world, has changed the ways of citizen involvement in governance. Politicians and (elected) public administrators worldwide have adopted Facebook as an important approach to connect with citizens. This study explores whether the Facebook phenomenon can improve the process of online political communication and citizen participation. The study adapts a content analysis method and proposes six strategies for analyzing Facebook page posts of Taiwanese legislators. The authors compare Facebook posts during both election and regular sessions to see the difference in patterns of these posts and communication strategies adopted by the legislators. The findings reveal that a percentage of e-participation achieves an acceptable rate, but most communication of legislator Facebook is one way. The results indicate that legislators' Facebook is another platform to distribute public information to citizens, and many have potential to create more public values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脸书会鼓励公民参与吗?
脸书是世界上最受欢迎的社交媒体,它改变了公民参与治理的方式。世界各地的政治家和(民选)公共行政人员都将脸书作为与公民联系的重要途径。本研究探讨脸书现象是否能改善网络政治沟通和公民参与的过程。本研究采用内容分析方法,提出了六种分析台湾立法委员脸书页面帖子的策略。作者比较了选举和例会期间脸书上的帖子,以了解这些帖子的模式和立法者采取的沟通策略的差异。调查结果显示,一定比例的电子参与达到了可接受的比率,但立法者脸书的大多数沟通都是一种方式。研究结果表明,立法者的脸书是向公民发布公共信息的另一个平台,许多人有潜力创造更多的公共价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Configurational Analysis of Infrastructuring in Digital Identity Platforms An Evaluation Framework for the Impact of Digitalization on the Quality of Governance The Correspondence Between PIKSA Model and the Community's Well-Being A New Model for a New Nature A Literature Review of E-Government Research in Mexico Utilizing the PRISMA Methodology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1