Economic Pessimism and the 2022 Election: A Postmortem

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Polity Pub Date : 2023-05-23 DOI:10.1086/725243
Brad Lockerbie
{"title":"Economic Pessimism and the 2022 Election: A Postmortem","authors":"Brad Lockerbie","doi":"10.1086/725243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prospective model of voting behavior has its genesis in the forecasting errors made in 1994. Virtually every political scientist that made a forecast was off by a good bit. One political scientist made a bet concerning the accuracy of his forecast of the Republicans only picking up in the low single digits. The actual outcome was a fifty-four-seat pickup by the Republicans. The political scientist (who shall remain nameless here) who made the single-digit forecast lost a modest sum of money. Like many articles, this project started by thinking that the others in the enterprise had made some mistakes. Many of the models make use of economic conditions when attempting to forecast election outcomes. The voting behavior literature is replete with retrospective and prospective economic models of voting behavior. Unfortunately, political forecasting with economic data necessitates parsimony because we have few cases. Consequently, the model employed here follows the literature focusing on economic expectations. Specifically, the Survey of Consumer Attitudes and Behavior has an item that asks respondents to evaluate whether they will be better off or worse off in the","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The prospective model of voting behavior has its genesis in the forecasting errors made in 1994. Virtually every political scientist that made a forecast was off by a good bit. One political scientist made a bet concerning the accuracy of his forecast of the Republicans only picking up in the low single digits. The actual outcome was a fifty-four-seat pickup by the Republicans. The political scientist (who shall remain nameless here) who made the single-digit forecast lost a modest sum of money. Like many articles, this project started by thinking that the others in the enterprise had made some mistakes. Many of the models make use of economic conditions when attempting to forecast election outcomes. The voting behavior literature is replete with retrospective and prospective economic models of voting behavior. Unfortunately, political forecasting with economic data necessitates parsimony because we have few cases. Consequently, the model employed here follows the literature focusing on economic expectations. Specifically, the Survey of Consumer Attitudes and Behavior has an item that asks respondents to evaluate whether they will be better off or worse off in the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济悲观主义与2022年大选:后死亡
投票行为的前瞻性模型起源于1994年的预测误差。事实上,每一位做出预测的政治学家都有点偏离。一位政治学家打赌,他对共和党人的预测准确性只有个位数。实际结果是共和党获得了五十四个席位。做出个位数预测的政治学家(此处不透露姓名)损失了一笔不多的钱。和许多文章一样,这个项目一开始就认为企业中的其他人犯了一些错误。许多模型在试图预测选举结果时都利用了经济条件。投票行为文献充满了投票行为的回顾性和前瞻性经济模型。不幸的是,用经济数据进行政治预测需要节俭,因为我们的案例很少。因此,本文采用的模型遵循了关注经济预期的文献。具体来说,消费者态度和行为调查有一个项目,要求受访者评估他们在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polity
Polity POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.
期刊最新文献
Does Size Matter in the Context of the Global South? Theorizing the Smallest States The Unique and the Universal in International Studies Theories from the Global South Ideas from the Global South: Dependency and Decoloniality Incorporating Global South Perspectives in the Study of International Relations: Reflections on the Field Long Day’s Journey Into Night
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1