The Great Recession of 2008 from the Subjective Well-being Perspective: Implication for Policy-making in the EU Countries

IF 1.1 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.2478/nispa-2022-0014
Ondřej Kopečný
{"title":"The Great Recession of 2008 from the Subjective Well-being Perspective: Implication for Policy-making in the EU Countries","authors":"Ondřej Kopečný","doi":"10.2478/nispa-2022-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Literature review implies that despite the Great Recession of 2008 the economic policy paradigm continues to prevail in assessing and measuring the well-being in the EU countries. This means that the institutional goals and the follow-up policies also tend to favor economic over non-economic objectives. This paper examines to what extent the Great Recession has increased or decreased the influence of economic factors on subjective well-being and the implications for policy-making. Regression analysis of subjective well-being data from 2006, 2011, and 2016 from 16 countries from the European Union shows that the influence of economic factors on subjective well-being is stronger than before the Great Recession in the majority of the analyzed countries. It has also revealed that satisfaction with one’s standard of living is a much stronger predictor of subjective well-being than the overall economic situation.","PeriodicalId":43378,"journal":{"name":"NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2022-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Literature review implies that despite the Great Recession of 2008 the economic policy paradigm continues to prevail in assessing and measuring the well-being in the EU countries. This means that the institutional goals and the follow-up policies also tend to favor economic over non-economic objectives. This paper examines to what extent the Great Recession has increased or decreased the influence of economic factors on subjective well-being and the implications for policy-making. Regression analysis of subjective well-being data from 2006, 2011, and 2016 from 16 countries from the European Union shows that the influence of economic factors on subjective well-being is stronger than before the Great Recession in the majority of the analyzed countries. It has also revealed that satisfaction with one’s standard of living is a much stronger predictor of subjective well-being than the overall economic situation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主观幸福视角下的2008年大衰退:对欧盟国家政策制定的启示
摘要文献综述表明,尽管2008年发生了大衰退,但在评估和衡量欧盟国家的福祉方面,经济政策范式仍然占主导地位。这意味着制度目标和后续政策也倾向于支持经济目标而非非非经济目标。本文研究了大衰退在多大程度上增加或减少了经济因素对主观幸福感的影响以及对政策制定的影响。对欧盟16个国家2006年、2011年和2016年主观幸福感数据的回归分析表明,在大多数被分析国家,经济因素对主观幸福感的影响比大衰退前更强。研究还表明,对生活水平的满意度比整体经济状况更能预测主观幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
The 2020 Czech Regional Elections in the Shadow of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Electoral Participation in the Spread of the Pandemic Innovation Policy Coordination: The Role of Communication for Uzbekistan Collaborative Approach on Digital Government Transformation: In-Depth Analysis from Expert Interview Public Policy Failure: The Case of Arts and Sports Policy in Kazakhstan Citizens’ Satisfaction with “Citizens’ Initiatives”: The Case of the Municipality of Ljubljana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1