{"title":"Collating Piers Plowman in Archbishop Parker’s Household","authors":"L. Warner","doi":"10.1093/res/hgad050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This essay brings to light the most substantial episodes of textual scholarship on Piers Plowman to have occurred over the space of 300-odd years, of which one certainly, the other likely, took place in the household of Archbishop Matthew Parker. The former consists of a series of red numbers inscribed next to lines in two passus of the C-version copy Cambridge, Corpus Christi MS 293, which are shown to refer to the pages on which the equivalent lines appear in a sixteenth-century printed edition of Piers B, reflecting careful comparison of their respective texts. The latter is manifested in the ‘correction’ of a portion of the C-text manuscript London, British Library, MS Royal 18 B xvii so as to bring it into line with its equivalent in a printed edition of B. The placement of the lines is suggestive of access by the corrector to unbound printed matter. This episode, so it is argued, is most intelligible in the context of such episodes of correction as that in which John Joscelyn, Parker’s secretary, engaged. A sub-theme of the essay is that Stephan Batman’s putative centrality to the topic of the Parkerian Piers is not supported by any evidence.","PeriodicalId":46496,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF ENGLISH STUDIES","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEW OF ENGLISH STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/res/hgad050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This essay brings to light the most substantial episodes of textual scholarship on Piers Plowman to have occurred over the space of 300-odd years, of which one certainly, the other likely, took place in the household of Archbishop Matthew Parker. The former consists of a series of red numbers inscribed next to lines in two passus of the C-version copy Cambridge, Corpus Christi MS 293, which are shown to refer to the pages on which the equivalent lines appear in a sixteenth-century printed edition of Piers B, reflecting careful comparison of their respective texts. The latter is manifested in the ‘correction’ of a portion of the C-text manuscript London, British Library, MS Royal 18 B xvii so as to bring it into line with its equivalent in a printed edition of B. The placement of the lines is suggestive of access by the corrector to unbound printed matter. This episode, so it is argued, is most intelligible in the context of such episodes of correction as that in which John Joscelyn, Parker’s secretary, engaged. A sub-theme of the essay is that Stephan Batman’s putative centrality to the topic of the Parkerian Piers is not supported by any evidence.
这篇文章揭示了300多年来发生的关于皮尔斯·普洛曼的文本研究中最重要的一幕,其中一幕肯定发生在大主教马修·帕克的家中。前者由一系列红色数字组成,这些数字刻在剑桥C版《科珀斯克里斯蒂MS 293》的两个passus中的线条旁边,这些数字是指16世纪印刷版《皮尔斯B》中出现等效线条的页面,反映了对各自文本的仔细比较。后者表现在对C文本手稿伦敦,大英图书馆,MS Royal 18 B xvii的一部分进行“更正”,使其与B印刷版中的同等手稿保持一致。行的位置表明校正者可以访问未装订的印刷品。有人认为,在帕克的秘书约翰·乔塞林参与的纠正事件中,这一事件是最容易理解的。这篇文章的一个次要主题是,Stephan Batman对Parkerian Piers主题的假定中心地位没有任何证据支持。