Attorney-client confidentiality in Saudi law: a critical study on the Saudi code of law practice

Fatimah Alshehaby
{"title":"Attorney-client confidentiality in Saudi law: a critical study on the Saudi code of law practice","authors":"Fatimah Alshehaby","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2022.2155170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Confidentiality is the most basic principle in respect of the lawyer-client relationship. Without the secrecy between lawyer and client, it would be complicated for a lawyer to solidify and establish trustworthy and credible communication with the clients, which might affect their legal representation. In the Saudi legal system, confidentiality is safeguarded under some crucial laws and regulations such as– Code of Law Practice, and the Rule of Professional Conduct for Lawyers. As Islamic law, i.e. Sharia is the primary legal source in the Saudi Arabia, the Code of Law Practice provides the lawyers and clients with the protection of confidentiality as long as there is no palpable violation of Islamic principles. However, there is no formal definition of “the violation of Islamic principles” stated in Article 23 of the Code. This might be problematic and lead to diverse interpretations by courts and authorities which is undermining the protection of confidentiality and sabotaging the lawyer-client relationship. In order to investigate such a labyrinth, this article aims to scrutinize and assess the confidentiality of the clients’ information in the Saudi regulations of the legal profession. It also evaluates the necessity of establishing a precise definition of confidentiality in the Saudi legal system.","PeriodicalId":43893,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2022.2155170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Confidentiality is the most basic principle in respect of the lawyer-client relationship. Without the secrecy between lawyer and client, it would be complicated for a lawyer to solidify and establish trustworthy and credible communication with the clients, which might affect their legal representation. In the Saudi legal system, confidentiality is safeguarded under some crucial laws and regulations such as– Code of Law Practice, and the Rule of Professional Conduct for Lawyers. As Islamic law, i.e. Sharia is the primary legal source in the Saudi Arabia, the Code of Law Practice provides the lawyers and clients with the protection of confidentiality as long as there is no palpable violation of Islamic principles. However, there is no formal definition of “the violation of Islamic principles” stated in Article 23 of the Code. This might be problematic and lead to diverse interpretations by courts and authorities which is undermining the protection of confidentiality and sabotaging the lawyer-client relationship. In order to investigate such a labyrinth, this article aims to scrutinize and assess the confidentiality of the clients’ information in the Saudi regulations of the legal profession. It also evaluates the necessity of establishing a precise definition of confidentiality in the Saudi legal system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特法律中的律师-客户保密:对沙特法律实务准则的批判性研究
摘要保密是律师与客户关系中最基本的原则。如果没有律师和客户之间的保密,律师与客户之间巩固和建立值得信赖和可信的沟通将是复杂的,这可能会影响他们的法律代理。在沙特法律体系中,保密受到一些重要法律法规的保护,如《执业法》和《律师职业行为准则》。由于伊斯兰法律,即伊斯兰教法是沙特阿拉伯的主要法律来源,《执业法》为律师和客户提供保密保护,只要没有明显违反伊斯兰原则的行为。然而,《法典》第23条没有对“违反伊斯兰原则”作出正式定义。这可能会产生问题,并导致法院和当局做出不同的解释,从而破坏保密保护,破坏律师与客户的关系。为了调查这样一个迷宫,本文旨在审查和评估沙特法律界法规中客户信息的保密性。它还评估了在沙特法律体系中建立一个精确的保密定义的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Silent boundaries: exploring the limits of legal confidentiality in Poland New professional spaces and trajectories: tracing the evolution of legal professionals – introduction to special issue The authority of the elders or the colonisers? Customary law and culture – which legal skills? Assessing law students in a GenAI world to create knowledgeable future lawyers Navigating the legal landscape: large language models and the hesitancy of legal professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1