Goals of endoscopic eradication therapy in Barrett’s esophagus: a narrative review

C. Frederiks, Sanne N. van Munster, B. Weusten
{"title":"Goals of endoscopic eradication therapy in Barrett’s esophagus: a narrative review","authors":"C. Frederiks, Sanne N. van Munster, B. Weusten","doi":"10.21037/AOE-2020-ETBE-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Barrett’s esophagus is a premalignant condition, and endoscopic eradication therapy is indicated upon development of early neoplasia. Therapy consists of endoscopic resection for visible lesions, if present, followed by endoscopic ablation for remaining flat Barrett’s epithelium. Since Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia in itself is asymptomatic disease, the ultimate goal of endoscopic eradication therapy is to prevent progression to advanced cancer: a disease stage with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. The preventive nature of endoscopic treatment may give rise to debate about the preferred endpoint to pursue. Establishment of a careful balance between the benefits of endoscopic eradication therapy against its risks, such as complications and other adverse events, may help to define the optimum endpoint for each individual patient. To date, various endpoints have been used in regular practice and different endpoints are used in clinical studies. The most important differences between these endpoints are whether all visible Barrett’s epithelium is eradicated or all dysplasia and cancer; and whether the endpoint is assessed on endoscopic examination only or with histologic confirmation. In this narrative review, we aim to evaluate these different endpoints of endoscopic eradication therapy with potential advantages and limitations, and present three clinical vignettes each with a different suggestion for an appropriate treatment endpoint. 10","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-2020-ETBE-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Barrett’s esophagus is a premalignant condition, and endoscopic eradication therapy is indicated upon development of early neoplasia. Therapy consists of endoscopic resection for visible lesions, if present, followed by endoscopic ablation for remaining flat Barrett’s epithelium. Since Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia in itself is asymptomatic disease, the ultimate goal of endoscopic eradication therapy is to prevent progression to advanced cancer: a disease stage with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. The preventive nature of endoscopic treatment may give rise to debate about the preferred endpoint to pursue. Establishment of a careful balance between the benefits of endoscopic eradication therapy against its risks, such as complications and other adverse events, may help to define the optimum endpoint for each individual patient. To date, various endpoints have been used in regular practice and different endpoints are used in clinical studies. The most important differences between these endpoints are whether all visible Barrett’s epithelium is eradicated or all dysplasia and cancer; and whether the endpoint is assessed on endoscopic examination only or with histologic confirmation. In this narrative review, we aim to evaluate these different endpoints of endoscopic eradication therapy with potential advantages and limitations, and present three clinical vignettes each with a different suggestion for an appropriate treatment endpoint. 10
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barrett食管内镜根除治疗的目标:叙述性综述
:Barrett食管是一种癌前病变,内镜下根除治疗适用于早期肿瘤的发展。治疗包括内镜下切除可见病变(如果存在),然后内镜下消融保留扁平的巴雷特上皮。由于早期肿瘤形成的巴雷特食管本身就是一种无症状疾病,内镜根除治疗的最终目标是防止进展为晚期癌症:这是一个治疗选择有限且预后不良的疾病阶段。内窥镜治疗的预防性可能会引发关于首选终点的争论。在内镜根除治疗的益处与其风险(如并发症和其他不良事件)之间建立谨慎的平衡,可能有助于确定每个患者的最佳终点。迄今为止,常规实践中使用了各种终点,临床研究中使用了不同的终点。这些终点之间最重要的差异是所有可见的巴雷特上皮是否被根除或所有发育不良和癌症;以及终点是仅在内镜检查中评估还是在组织学确认的情况下评估。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们旨在评估内镜根除治疗的这些不同终点及其潜在的优势和局限性,并提出三个临床小插曲,每个小插曲都对适当的治疗终点提出了不同的建议。10
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential impact of post-neoadjuvant stage on overall survival for surgically treated oesophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation: a retrospective cohort study Endoluminal vacuum therapy using a fenestrated surgical drain for management of anastomotic leak following esophagectomy Hot potato causing full-thickness esophageal burn and perforation: a case report The sequel of age and frailty on the pathophysiology and treatment of surgical esophageal diseases Post-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease after one anastomosis gastric bypass, a narrative review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1