Capturing what remains: A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022)

IF 1.2 2区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS First Language Pub Date : 2022-05-13 DOI:10.1177/01427237221096085

D. Slobin

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Kidd and Garcia remind us of the urgency of gathering comparable child language data across languages and cultures. They provide useful guidelines, and more are suggested here. Languages used for comparative analysis should be picked with regard to precise typological contrasts, pinpointing structures that promise to reveal processes of acquisition. Our knowledge gap may not be as severe as it seems to the authors; nevertheless, we are faced with daunting tasks of collecting data and preparing them for detailed analysis.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

捕捉残余：基德和加西亚的评论（2022）

Kidd和Garcia提醒我们，收集不同语言和文化的可比儿童语言数据的紧迫性。它们提供了有用的指导方针，并在这里提出了更多建议。用于比较分析的语言应该根据精确的类型对比来选择，精确定位有望揭示习得过程的结构。我们的知识差距可能并不像作者看起来那么严重；然而，我们面临着收集数据并为详细分析做好准备的艰巨任务。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

First Language Multiple-

CiteScore

3.80

自引率

10.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： First Language is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research in child language acquisition. Child language research is multidisciplinary and this is reflected in the contents of the journal: research from diverse theoretical and methodological traditions is welcome. Authors from a wide range of disciplines - including psychology, linguistics, anthropology, cognitive science, neuroscience, communication, sociology and education - are regularly represented in our pages. Empirical papers range from individual case studies, through experiments, observational/ naturalistic, analyses of CHILDES corpora, to parental surveys.