Validation of a novel mobile phone application for type 2 diabetes screening following gestational diabetes mellitus.

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES mHealth Pub Date : 2022-04-20 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth-21-36
Helen B Gomez Slagle, Matthew K Hoffman, Richard Caplan, Philip Shlossman, Anthony C Sciscione
{"title":"Validation of a novel mobile phone application for type 2 diabetes screening following gestational diabetes mellitus.","authors":"Helen B Gomez Slagle, Matthew K Hoffman, Richard Caplan, Philip Shlossman, Anthony C Sciscione","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-21-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We sought to determine if using fasting blood glucose (FBG) through text-based care is an effective screening tool for type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period compared to in-person, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance testing (2hr OGTT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center interventional study that included individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes. Patients were enrolled in standard, office-based 2hr OGTT in combination with text-based remote diabetes screening. Study participants were instructed to record FBG for 3 consecutive days using a mobile application. We assessed agreement with 2hr OGTT using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 446 individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes met inclusion criteria, 239 of which were enrolled in standard office-based screening and 207 were enrolled in dual screening using standard 2hr OGTT testing combined with text-based remote FBG screening. A FBG value less than 100 mg/dL had 100% sensitivity (86-100%), 86% specificity (77-93%) with a 100% (94-100%) negative predictive value and 71% (54-85%) positive predictive value. Follow-up was significantly higher among individuals enrolled in remote text-based screening compared to standard in-office screening (48% <i>vs.</i> 25%, respectively; P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Text-based screening may be a feasible alternative to in-office screening. A mobile-based system using FBG successfully screened all patients with type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period with 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value. Remote telehealth screening significantly increased follow-up with type 2 diabetes screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"8 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9014228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-21-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We sought to determine if using fasting blood glucose (FBG) through text-based care is an effective screening tool for type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period compared to in-person, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance testing (2hr OGTT).

Methods: This was a single-center interventional study that included individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes. Patients were enrolled in standard, office-based 2hr OGTT in combination with text-based remote diabetes screening. Study participants were instructed to record FBG for 3 consecutive days using a mobile application. We assessed agreement with 2hr OGTT using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals.

Results: A total of 446 individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes met inclusion criteria, 239 of which were enrolled in standard office-based screening and 207 were enrolled in dual screening using standard 2hr OGTT testing combined with text-based remote FBG screening. A FBG value less than 100 mg/dL had 100% sensitivity (86-100%), 86% specificity (77-93%) with a 100% (94-100%) negative predictive value and 71% (54-85%) positive predictive value. Follow-up was significantly higher among individuals enrolled in remote text-based screening compared to standard in-office screening (48% vs. 25%, respectively; P<0.001).

Conclusions: Text-based screening may be a feasible alternative to in-office screening. A mobile-based system using FBG successfully screened all patients with type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period with 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value. Remote telehealth screening significantly increased follow-up with type 2 diabetes screening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新型手机应用程序在妊娠期糖尿病后2型糖尿病筛查中的验证。
背景我们试图确定通过基于文本的护理使用空腹血糖(FBG)与亲自进行2小时口服糖耐量测试(2hrOGTT)相比,是否是产后2型糖尿病的有效筛查工具。患者被纳入标准的、基于办公室的2小时OGTT,并结合基于文本的远程糖尿病筛查。研究参与者被要求使用移动应用程序连续3天记录FBG。我们使用灵敏度、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及精确的二项式95%置信区间来评估与2hr OGTT的一致性。结果共有446名被诊断为妊娠期糖尿病的患者符合纳入标准,其中239人参加了标准的基于办公室的筛查,207人参加了使用标准2小时OGTT测试和基于文本的远程FBG筛查的双重筛查。FBG值小于100 mg/dL具有100%的敏感性(86-100%)、86%的特异性(77-93%)和100%(94-100%)的阴性预测值以及71%(54-85%)的阳性预测值。与标准的办公室筛查相比,远程文本筛查的随访率明显更高(分别为48%和25%;P<0.001)。结论基于文本的筛查可能是办公室筛查的可行替代方案。一个使用FBG的基于移动的系统成功筛查了所有产后2型糖尿病患者,具有100%的敏感性和阴性预测值。远程远程健康筛查显著增加了2型糖尿病筛查的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A mobile health-based alcohol reduction intervention and its usability among persons with Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Uganda. Analyzing motivation for tele-exercise in adult fitness app users. A scoping review of implementation determinants and strategy alignment patterns in mHealth interventions for stroke recurrence prevention between low and high resource settings. Caregiver inclusion influence on adolescent acceptance and engagement of an mHealth app, a randomized controlled trial. Development and validation of an online tool for assessing dietary intake, diet quality, and environmental impact in Mexico.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1