Taphonomic Analyses of Cave Breccia in Southeast Asia: A Review and Future Directions

Q1 Social Sciences Open Quaternary Pub Date : 2020-12-14 DOI:10.5334/oq.75
Holly E. Smith, Mike W. Morley, Julien Louys
{"title":"Taphonomic Analyses of Cave Breccia in Southeast Asia: A Review and Future Directions","authors":"Holly E. Smith, Mike W. Morley, Julien Louys","doi":"10.5334/oq.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Karst-derived breccia is the most analysed deposit in fossil-bearing Southeast Asian caves due to its superior preservation potential for human, faunal, archaeological, and palaeontological data. The study of breccia can provide a better understanding of human and faunal histories, and an opportunity to investigate site taphonomy and insights into environments of deposition and post-depositional processes. We review the literature on approaches used to improve the taphonomic understanding of cave deposits in Southeast Asia and how these deposits fit into a cave’s life history. We discuss common methods used to extract taphonomic data retained in Southeast Asian cave deposits and the associated opportunities to discern the mechanisms of cave formation, depositional history, and faunal accumulation. While attempts have previously been made to discern the taphonomic characteristics of Pleistocene vertebrate remains in the region, there has been no comprehensive review outlining methods used to understand taphonomic histories and the biases introduced through these processes. We illustrate the challenges of researching cave breccias in Southeast Asia and the knowledge gaps brought about by conventional methodologies. Uncertainties exist about the extent to which breccia can be examined to infer the taphonomic history of a vertebrate assemblage. These uncertainties exist in part because of dating complexities. This review demonstrates that a taphonomic analysis of breccia in complex long-term accumulations requires a multi-disciplinary approach. We recommend using digital techniques to record spatial distribution data for a thorough interpretation of taphonomic characteristics.","PeriodicalId":37172,"journal":{"name":"Open Quaternary","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Quaternary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/oq.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Karst-derived breccia is the most analysed deposit in fossil-bearing Southeast Asian caves due to its superior preservation potential for human, faunal, archaeological, and palaeontological data. The study of breccia can provide a better understanding of human and faunal histories, and an opportunity to investigate site taphonomy and insights into environments of deposition and post-depositional processes. We review the literature on approaches used to improve the taphonomic understanding of cave deposits in Southeast Asia and how these deposits fit into a cave’s life history. We discuss common methods used to extract taphonomic data retained in Southeast Asian cave deposits and the associated opportunities to discern the mechanisms of cave formation, depositional history, and faunal accumulation. While attempts have previously been made to discern the taphonomic characteristics of Pleistocene vertebrate remains in the region, there has been no comprehensive review outlining methods used to understand taphonomic histories and the biases introduced through these processes. We illustrate the challenges of researching cave breccias in Southeast Asia and the knowledge gaps brought about by conventional methodologies. Uncertainties exist about the extent to which breccia can be examined to infer the taphonomic history of a vertebrate assemblage. These uncertainties exist in part because of dating complexities. This review demonstrates that a taphonomic analysis of breccia in complex long-term accumulations requires a multi-disciplinary approach. We recommend using digital techniques to record spatial distribution data for a thorough interpretation of taphonomic characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东南亚洞穴角砾岩的地质分析:回顾与展望
岩溶角砾岩是东南亚含化石洞穴中分析最多的矿床,因为它对人类、动物群、考古和古生物学数据具有优越的保存潜力。角砾岩的研究可以更好地了解人类和动物群的历史,并有机会调查现场的埋藏情况,深入了解沉积环境和沉积后过程。我们回顾了有关提高对东南亚洞穴沉积物的地震学理解的方法的文献,以及这些沉积物如何融入洞穴的生活史。我们讨论了用于提取东南亚洞穴沉积物中保留的埋藏学数据的常用方法,以及辨别洞穴形成机制、沉积历史和动物群聚集的相关机会。尽管此前曾试图辨别该地区更新世脊椎动物遗骸的地穴特征,但尚未对用于了解地穴历史的方法以及通过这些过程引入的偏见进行全面综述。我们阐述了研究东南亚洞穴角砾岩的挑战以及传统方法带来的知识差距。角砾岩在多大程度上可以被检查以推断脊椎动物组合的埋藏史,这一点存在不确定性。存在这些不确定性的部分原因是年代的复杂性。这篇综述表明,对复杂长期堆积中的角砾岩进行地震学分析需要多学科的方法。我们建议使用数字技术来记录空间分布数据,以便彻底解释地震学特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Quaternary
Open Quaternary Social Sciences-Archeology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Two Centuries of Relative Sea-Level Rise in Dublin, Ireland, Reconstructed by Geological Tide Gauge A Review of Archaeological and Paleoecological Radiocarbon Dating in Bolivia Range Mapper: An Adaptable Process for Making and Using Interactive, Animated Web Maps of Late-Quaternary Open Paleoecological Data Osteometric Study of Metapodial Bones and Phalanges as Indicators of the Behavioural Ecology of Modern Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) and Implications for Reconstruction of Paleo Mobility Evidence for Marine Consumption During the Upper Palaeolithic at “El Pirulejo” Inland Rock- Shelter (Southern Iberia Peninsula, Spain)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1