Improved detection of coronary artery disease by CZT regional coronary blood flow evaluation.

R S L Lima, A Bezerra, M Andrade, C Domenico, A De Lorenzo
{"title":"Improved detection of coronary artery disease by CZT regional coronary blood flow evaluation.","authors":"R S L Lima, A Bezerra, M Andrade, C Domenico, A De Lorenzo","doi":"10.3389/fnume.2022.1072729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>CZT cameras have enabled the noninvasive quantification of myocardial flow reserve (MFR), an important physiologic measure. This study aimed to compare myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) with or without MFR evaluation for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>48 patients with CAD (>50% obstruction) detected at invasive coronary angiography or CT angiography underwent dipyridamole MPS and MFR evaluation within 30 days. A 1-day protocol (rest-stress) was used to quantify MFR. The acquisition of dynamic rest and stress images was initiated simultaneously to 99mTc sestamibi injection (370 and 1,110 MBq, respectively), both lasting for 11 min, followed by 5-min imaging. Pharmacologic stress with dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg for 4 min) was performed with the patient positioned in the CZT camera. The images were processed and time-activity curves were generated, calculating global and regional MFR in a semiautomatic software. A global or regional MFR <2 was considered abnormal. MPS perfusion images were classified as normal or abnormal. The images were interpreted by experienced physicians blinded to the results of MFR and coronary angiography/CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of the population was 61 ± 9 years, 54.2% female. Twenty patients (41.7%) had single-vessel CAD, 22 (45.8%) 2-vessel CAD and 6 (12.5%), triple-vessel CAD. Among the 82 vessels with obstruction, 48 had perfusion abnormalities in MPS and 60 had reduced MFR, while among the normal vessels, had 54 normal MPS and 52 had preserved MFR. The sensitivity of MFR (69%) was higher than that of MPS (55.2%), without significant changes in specificity (86 vs. 83.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MFR in the CZT camera is more sensitive for the detection of CAD than perfusion abnormalities in MPS, especially in patients with multivessel CAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":73095,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in nuclear medicine (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":"1072729"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in nuclear medicine (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2022.1072729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: CZT cameras have enabled the noninvasive quantification of myocardial flow reserve (MFR), an important physiologic measure. This study aimed to compare myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) with or without MFR evaluation for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: 48 patients with CAD (>50% obstruction) detected at invasive coronary angiography or CT angiography underwent dipyridamole MPS and MFR evaluation within 30 days. A 1-day protocol (rest-stress) was used to quantify MFR. The acquisition of dynamic rest and stress images was initiated simultaneously to 99mTc sestamibi injection (370 and 1,110 MBq, respectively), both lasting for 11 min, followed by 5-min imaging. Pharmacologic stress with dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg for 4 min) was performed with the patient positioned in the CZT camera. The images were processed and time-activity curves were generated, calculating global and regional MFR in a semiautomatic software. A global or regional MFR <2 was considered abnormal. MPS perfusion images were classified as normal or abnormal. The images were interpreted by experienced physicians blinded to the results of MFR and coronary angiography/CT.

Results: Mean age of the population was 61 ± 9 years, 54.2% female. Twenty patients (41.7%) had single-vessel CAD, 22 (45.8%) 2-vessel CAD and 6 (12.5%), triple-vessel CAD. Among the 82 vessels with obstruction, 48 had perfusion abnormalities in MPS and 60 had reduced MFR, while among the normal vessels, had 54 normal MPS and 52 had preserved MFR. The sensitivity of MFR (69%) was higher than that of MPS (55.2%), without significant changes in specificity (86 vs. 83.7%).

Conclusions: MFR in the CZT camera is more sensitive for the detection of CAD than perfusion abnormalities in MPS, especially in patients with multivessel CAD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CZT区域冠状动脉血流评价对冠状动脉疾病检测的改进
引言CZT摄像机实现了心肌血流储备(MFR)的无创量化,这是一项重要的生理测量。本研究旨在比较心肌灌注SPECT(MPS)在检测阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)时是否进行MFR评估。方法对48例经冠状动脉造影或CT血管造影术诊断为CAD(>50%梗阻)的患者,在30天内进行双嘧达莫MPS和MFR评估。使用1天方案(休息应激)来量化MFR。动态静息和应力图像的采集与99mTc-sestamibi注射(370和1110 MBq),均持续11 分钟,然后进行5分钟成像。双嘧达莫(0.56 mg/kg,4 min)在患者位于CZT相机中的情况下进行。对图像进行处理并生成时间-活动曲线,在半自动软件中计算全局和区域MFR。全球或区域MFR<2被认为是异常的。MPS灌注图像分为正常或异常。这些图像由经验丰富的医生进行解读,他们对MFR和冠状动脉造影/CT的结果一无所知。结果人群平均年龄61岁 ± 9岁,女性54.2%。20名患者(41.7%)患有单血管CAD,22名患者(45.8%)患有双血管CAD,6名患者(12.5%)患有三血管CAD。在82条阻塞血管中,48条MPS灌注异常,60条MFR降低,而在正常血管中,54条MPS正常,52条MFR保持。MFR的灵敏度(69%)高于MPS(55.2%),特异性无明显变化(86对83.7%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immunohistochemical basis for FAP as a candidate theranostic target across a broad range of cholangiocarcinoma subtypes. SMART-PET: a Self-SiMilARiTy-aware generative adversarial framework for reconstructing low-count [18F]-FDG-PET brain imaging. Editorial: Recent advances in radiotheranostics. αvβ6-integrin targeted PET/CT imaging in pancreatic cancer patients using 68Ga-Trivehexin. Contrastive learning for neural fingerprinting from limited neuroimaging data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1