“Placing Equity Front and Center” for Teacher Education in a Time of Crisis

IF 3.1 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Teacher Education Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1177/00224871231189792
K. McDonough, S. Nieto, Valerie Hill-Jackson, C. Craig
{"title":"“Placing Equity Front and Center” for Teacher Education in a Time of Crisis","authors":"K. McDonough, S. Nieto, Valerie Hill-Jackson, C. Craig","doi":"10.1177/00224871231189792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although equity-minded practitioners, scholars, and policymakers in the field of teacher education believed we were making slow but steady progress in educational parity, we find this certainty tested at a critical time in history. As this editorial was being finalized on June 29, 2023, the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE) was forced to respond to the ruling by the United States Supreme Court in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard University and University of North Carolina (2023), declaring the pronouncement to strike down affirmative action and other racial and ethnic preferences in college admissions as “contrary to our collective efforts to build an educator workforce that is diverse and representative” (American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education [AACTE], 2023, para. 1). Affirmative action does not focus on specific quotas but rather on targeted goals to tackle past discrimination in a particular institution or in broader society through “good-faith efforts . . . to identify, select, and train potentially qualified men and women” (Feinberg, 2005, p. 272). Already plagued by a lack of representation of teachers of color in university educator preparation programs (AACTE, 2018) and U.S. classrooms (Hill-Jackson, 2017; National Center for Education Statistics [NCES], 2018), practitioners and scholars of teacher education sustain a collective gut punch as we ponder how the impactful work of equity in teacher education would continue in a politically polarized nation.","PeriodicalId":17162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teacher Education","volume":"74 1","pages":"293 - 298"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231189792","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although equity-minded practitioners, scholars, and policymakers in the field of teacher education believed we were making slow but steady progress in educational parity, we find this certainty tested at a critical time in history. As this editorial was being finalized on June 29, 2023, the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE) was forced to respond to the ruling by the United States Supreme Court in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard University and University of North Carolina (2023), declaring the pronouncement to strike down affirmative action and other racial and ethnic preferences in college admissions as “contrary to our collective efforts to build an educator workforce that is diverse and representative” (American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education [AACTE], 2023, para. 1). Affirmative action does not focus on specific quotas but rather on targeted goals to tackle past discrimination in a particular institution or in broader society through “good-faith efforts . . . to identify, select, and train potentially qualified men and women” (Feinberg, 2005, p. 272). Already plagued by a lack of representation of teachers of color in university educator preparation programs (AACTE, 2018) and U.S. classrooms (Hill-Jackson, 2017; National Center for Education Statistics [NCES], 2018), practitioners and scholars of teacher education sustain a collective gut punch as we ponder how the impactful work of equity in teacher education would continue in a politically polarized nation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危机时期的教师教育“以公平为中心”
尽管教师教育领域具有公平意识的从业者、学者和政策制定者认为,我们在教育平等方面取得了缓慢但稳定的进展,但我们发现,这种确定性在历史的关键时刻受到了考验。由于这篇社论于2023年6月29日定稿,美国师范教育学院协会(AACTE)被迫对美国最高法院关于学生公平录取,股份有限公司诉哈佛大学和北卡罗来纳大学校长和研究员(2023年)的裁决作出回应,宣布在大学招生中打击平权行动和其他种族和族裔偏好的声明“违背了我们建立一支多样化和有代表性的教育工作者队伍的集体努力”(美国师范教育学院协会[AACTE],2023,第1段)。平权行动并不侧重于具体的配额,而是着眼于有针对性的目标,通过“真诚的努力……识别、选择和培训潜在合格的男女”来解决特定机构或更广泛社会中过去的歧视问题(Feinberg,2005,第272页)。有色人种教师在大学教育工作者准备项目(AACTE,2018)和美国课堂上缺乏代表性(Hill Jackson,2017;国家教育统计中心[NCES],2018),当我们思考在一个政治两极分化的国家,教师教育公平的有效工作将如何继续时,教师教育的从业者和学者们承受着集体的打击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Teacher Education
Journal of Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Teacher Education, the flagship journal of AACTE, is to serve as a research forum for a diverse group of scholars who are invested in the preparation and continued support of teachers and who can have a significant voice in discussions and decision-making around issues of teacher education. One of the fundamental goals of the journal is the use of evidence from rigorous investigation to identify and address the increasingly complex issues confronting teacher education at the national and global levels. These issues include but are not limited to preparing teachers to effectively address the needs of marginalized youth, their families and communities; program design and impact; selection, recruitment and retention of teachers from underrepresented groups; local and national policy; accountability; and routes to certification. JTE does not publish book reviews, program evaluations or articles solely describing programs, program components, courses or personal experiences. In addition, JTE does not accept manuscripts that are solely about the development or validation of an instrument unless the use of that instrument yields data providing new insights into issues of relevance to teacher education (MSU, February 2016).
期刊最新文献
What Matters For Mentors As Knowledge Mobilizers: Are They Easy Riders? Teaching Summative Assessment: A Curriculum Analysis of Pre-Service Language Teacher Education in Sweden and Finland Study Program Leaders’ Perceptions of Coherence and Strategies for Creating Coherent Teacher Education Programs A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness of the Building Educators’ Skills in Adolescent Mental Health (BEAM) Program for Improving Secondary School Educators’ Confidence, Behavior, Knowledge, and Attitudes Toward Student Mental Health Silencing Equity-Minded Teacher Preparation: How Do Teacher Educators Respond?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1